UCC code requirements causing filing headaches - need clarification
Been dealing with some UCC filing complications and wondering if anyone has solid experience with the specific code requirements. Working on a equipment financing deal where the debtor entity underwent a name change mid-transaction, and now I'm second-guessing whether our UCC-1 filing properly reflects the correct legal entity name according to the UCC code provisions. The collateral schedule covers manufacturing equipment valued around $485,000, and we're about 8 months into the initial filing period. Our compliance officer is concerned that if the debtor name doesn't exactly match the charter documents under UCC code standards, we could have perfection issues that void our security interest entirely. Has anyone dealt with similar name-matching requirements under UCC code when the business entity changes names after the original loan documents but before filing? The secretary of state portal accepted our filing initially, but that doesn't guarantee we're actually perfected if there's a code violation we missed.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Miles Hammonds
UCC code is pretty strict about debtor names - you're right to be concerned. The entity name on your UCC-1 has to match exactly what's on the charter or organizational documents at the time of filing. If there was a legal name change, you might need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to reflect the current legal entity. What type of entity are we talking about? Corporation, LLC, partnership?
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•It's an LLC that changed from 'Premier Manufacturing Solutions LLC' to 'Premier Manufacturing & Distribution LLC' about 3 months after we closed the loan but before we filed the UCC-1. We used the new name on the filing since that was the current legal name, but now I'm wondering if we should have used the original name from the loan docs.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•Okay, that's actually a tricky situation. Under UCC code, you typically want the name that appears on the public organic record with the secretary of state at the time of filing. If the LLC had already amended its articles to reflect the new name before your UCC-1 filing, then using the new name was probably correct.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
I've seen this exact scenario cause major problems in bankruptcy proceedings. The UCC code requirements for debtor names aren't just bureaucratic - they're critical for search logic. If someone searches under the old name, they won't find your filing, which could mean you're not properly perfected. Did you run searches under both names to see what shows up?
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•We did search under both names and our filing shows up under the new name but not the old one. That makes me think we might be okay, but the stakes are too high to guess.
0 coins
Micah Franklin
•The search results are a good indicator, but not definitive proof of perfection under UCC code standards. You really need to verify that the name on your filing matches the exact legal name in the state's database at the time you filed.
0 coins
Ella Harper
Had a similar mess last year with a corporate name change. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your loan docs, the UCC-1, and the entity's charter documents, and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies or UCC code compliance issues. Takes about 30 seconds and catches stuff that manual review misses. Might be worth running your docs through it to see if there are any red flags.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How accurate is it with UCC code requirements?
0 coins
Ella Harper
•It's been spot-on for me. The system cross-references everything automatically and highlights discrepancies that could cause perfection problems. Way better than trying to manually compare documents and guess about UCC code compliance.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•That actually sounds perfect for this situation. I'll check it out - having an automated way to verify UCC code compliance would definitely give me peace of mind.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
UGH why does UCC code have to be so complicated?? I swear every state interprets the debtor name requirements differently. Had a filing rejected last month because we used 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' even though both versions appear on different corporate documents. The inconsistency is maddening!
0 coins
Owen Devar
•I feel your pain! The UCC code should be standardized but every secretary of state office seems to have their own quirks about name formatting.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•That's why it's crucial to use the EXACT name from the secretary of state's database. No abbreviations, no variations, no assumptions about what should be acceptable under UCC code.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
Wait, I'm confused about something. If the LLC changed its name AFTER the loan closing but BEFORE the UCC filing, wouldn't the security agreement still reference the old name? How does that affect UCC code compliance when there's a mismatch between the security agreement and the UCC-1?
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•Good catch. The security agreement and UCC-1 don't have to match exactly under UCC code, but the UCC-1 debtor name must match the public record. However, you want to make sure your security agreement is still enforceable against the renamed entity.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•This is exactly why I mentioned bankruptcy risk earlier. If there's confusion about which entity is actually bound by the security agreement versus which entity is named on the UCC-1, you could have enforceability issues that go beyond just UCC code compliance.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•Oh great, now I'm worried about both UCC code compliance AND security agreement enforceability. This is getting complicated fast.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
Here's what I'd recommend: First, get a certified copy of the LLC's current articles from the secretary of state to confirm the exact legal name. Then compare that to what's on your UCC-1. If they match, you're likely fine under UCC code. If not, file a UCC-3 amendment immediately to correct the debtor name. Don't wait - the longer you leave a potential defect, the riskier it gets.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•That's solid advice. I'll request the certified articles first thing tomorrow. Better to be 100% certain about UCC code compliance than to assume we're okay.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Definitely the right approach. I've seen too many deals go sideways because someone assumed their UCC filing was good without actually verifying compliance with UCC code requirements.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
One thing to consider - even if your UCC-1 debtor name is technically correct under UCC code, you might want to file an additional UCC-1 under the old name just to be extra safe. It's cheap insurance for a $485K deal, and some lenders do this routinely when there's any name ambiguity.
0 coins
Brady Clean
•Is that really necessary though? Seems like overkill if the UCC code requirements are already satisfied with the correct current name.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•Maybe overkill for smaller deals, but for half a million in collateral, I'd rather be over-protected than under-protected. UCC code compliance is one thing, but practical searchability is another.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•I actually agree with this approach. Dual filings aren't uncommon when there's name uncertainty, and it eliminates any argument about UCC code compliance or search logic issues.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
This whole thread is making me paranoid about my own filings! I've got three UCC-1s that were filed right after corporate mergers and now I'm wondering if I screwed up the debtor names under UCC code. Guess I need to audit everything...
0 coins
Ella Harper
•That's exactly why I started using Certana.ai for all my UCC filings. Upload your merger docs and UCC filings and it'll tell you immediately if there are any UCC code compliance issues. Saves a ton of anxiety.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•Corporate mergers definitely add complexity to UCC code compliance. The surviving entity's name is usually what you want on the UCC-1, but the timing of everything matters a lot.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
Quick question - does UCC code require the debtor name to include things like 'LLC' or can you just use the business name without the entity designation?
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•You need the complete legal name including entity designation. So if it's 'ABC Company LLC' on the charter, that's what goes on the UCC-1. UCC code doesn't allow shortcuts or abbreviations.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•Got it, thanks. I've been doing it right then, but wasn't 100% sure about the UCC code requirements.
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
Update for everyone following this - I got the certified articles and confirmed our UCC-1 debtor name matches exactly. Also ran the docs through that Certana tool someone mentioned and it verified everything looks good for UCC code compliance. Thanks for all the guidance, definitely learned a lot about proper name verification procedures!
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•Great news! Glad you got confirmation of UCC code compliance. It's always better to verify than to worry.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Awesome that Certana worked well for you too. It's such a relief to get automated verification of UCC code compliance instead of just hoping you got it right.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Perfect outcome. Your compliance officer should be happy that you took the initiative to verify everything properly.
0 coins