UCC filing requirements in loan agreement causing compliance headaches
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation where our loan agreement requires specific UCC filing language that doesn't match what our borrower's corporate documents show. The loan agreement specifies the debtor name as 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but their operating agreement and state registration shows 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with the comma). Our compliance team is worried about filing the UCC-1 because if there's a name mismatch it could invalidate our security interest. The loan closes next week and we're stuck between filing with the loan agreement name vs the state registered name. Has anyone dealt with this type of discrepancy between loan docs and UCC filings? I've seen rejections for much smaller name variations and can't afford to have an unperfected lien on a $2.3M equipment financing deal.
27 comments
Join the conversation
Jade Lopez
This is exactly why I always do a name search before finalizing loan docs. The comma issue trips up so many lenders because state registrations aren't always consistent with how borrowers represent their names in agreements. For your UCC-1, you need to use the exact name from the state's official records - that's what the filing office will verify against. The loan agreement language doesn't determine UCC compliance, the state registration does.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
•So true about the comma thing! I've seen UCC-1s rejected for missing a comma, having an extra comma, even having 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated'. The filing offices are super strict about exact matches.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
•Wait, so if the loan agreement has the wrong name format, does that create issues with the security agreement itself? Or is it just the UCC filing that needs the state-registered name?
0 coins
Jade Lopez
•The security agreement should ideally match both the loan docs AND the state registration, but for UCC perfection purposes, the filing has to match state records. You might want to amend the loan docs if there's time, or at minimum add a clause acknowledging the name variation.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
Been there! Last month I had a similar issue with 'Technologies' vs 'Tech' in a company name. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - I uploaded both the loan agreement and the UCC-1 draft, and it flagged the name discrepancy immediately. Their system cross-checks everything against state databases and caught three other inconsistencies I would have missed. Really helped avoid a filing rejection on a time-sensitive deal.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•Never heard of Certana but that sounds incredibly useful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload the PDFs?
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•Yeah, super simple. You upload your loan docs and UCC forms as PDFs and it automatically cross-references debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, everything. Catches stuff like this comma issue before you file and get rejected.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•That would have saved me so much headache last year. I had to refile a UCC-1 three times because of name variations. The rejection notices don't always tell you exactly what's wrong either.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
File with the state registered name 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with comma). I guarantee you that's what the SOS system will verify against. The loan agreement name variation won't invalidate your security interest as long as it's clear you're referring to the same entity. Just document the discrepancy in your loan file and maybe add an amendment to the security agreement clarifying the name if you're really worried.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
•This is the right answer. I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and the filing office ONLY cares about matching their database. Everything else is just documentation between the parties.
0 coins
Haley Bennett
•What about continuation filings though? If you have to file a UCC-3 continuation in 5 years, will the name discrepancy with the original loan docs cause problems then?
0 coins
Tami Morgan
•Continuations reference the original UCC-1 filing, so as long as that initial filing was accepted with the correct state name, you're fine. The loan agreement language becomes less relevant once you have a properly perfected filing.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
UGH this stuff drives me crazy! Why can't loan software and UCC systems just talk to each other? I spend half my time dealing with these stupid name mismatches. Our legal team always wants the loan docs to match exactly but then SOS rejects the filing because of some tiny punctuation difference that nobody catches until it's too late.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•I feel your pain. The worst is when you catch it after closing and have to explain to the borrower why you need them to sign an amendment for something that seems so minor.
0 coins
Ruby Knight
•At least now there are tools like that Certana thing mentioned above that can catch this stuff early. Would definitely use something like that instead of finding out from a rejection notice.
0 coins
Diego Castillo
Check the state's UCC database search function too. Sometimes you can do a preliminary search with both name variations to see which one returns results for that entity. If they have existing filings, you'll see exactly how the name should be formatted for new filings.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Good point about existing filings. Also shows you if there are other liens already on file that might affect your collateral position.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•The search function is hit or miss though. Some states have better databases than others. I've had searches come back with nothing even when I knew there were active filings.
0 coins
Sean Matthews
Quick question - what state are you filing in? Some states are more forgiving about name variations than others. Also, is this an initial UCC-1 or are you amending an existing filing?
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•Initial UCC-1 filing in Delaware. The borrower doesn't have any existing UCCs on file which is why I'm being extra careful about getting the name exactly right from the start.
0 coins
Sean Matthews
•Delaware is usually pretty strict about exact name matches. Definitely go with the state registration format. You don't want to be the test case for how forgiving they are.
0 coins
Ali Anderson
Had this exact situation 6 months ago with a manufacturing client. Used one of those document checking services (think it was Certana.ai) that flagged not just the name issue but also found that our collateral description was too vague compared to what was listed in the loan agreement. Ended up preventing two potential problems instead of just the name mismatch. Sometimes these tools catch stuff your own review misses when you're rushing to close.
0 coins
Zadie Patel
•That's a good point about collateral descriptions. I always worry I'm being too specific or too general in those sections.
0 coins
Ali Anderson
•The nice thing about the automated checking is it compares your UCC language against the loan agreement language and flags where they don't align. Takes the guesswork out of it.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
Bottom line: file the UCC-1 with 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (the state registered name). Keep documentation of why you used that format vs the loan agreement version. Most importantly, don't let this delay your closing - a properly perfected lien with a minor documentation discrepancy is way better than missing your perfection window entirely.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•Thanks everyone for the advice. Going with the state registered name and adding a note to the loan file about the variation. Really appreciate the quick responses - this forum always comes through!
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•Glad it worked out! These name issues are so common but they still stress everyone out every time.
0 coins