UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC lien lookup showing conflicting records - which filing controls?
Running into a weird situation with a UCC lien lookup and need some clarity from anyone who's dealt with this before. We're doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and the target company shows two different UCC-1 filings against the same equipment collateral. Both are active and current, but they have slightly different debtor names (one shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and the other shows 'ABC Mfg LLC') for what appears to be the same entity. The filing numbers are completely different and they're dated about 8 months apart. When I do the UCC lien lookup in the state database, both pop up as valid and unexpired. How do I determine which one actually controls? The seller claims the older filing was supposed to be terminated when they refinanced, but there's no UCC-3 termination on record. This could completely change our valuation if there are two legitimate liens on the same collateral. Has anyone run into overlapping UCC filings like this during M&A due diligence?
Join the conversation
Arkansas UCC-1 debtor name rejected twice - need help with exact format
Filed a UCC-1 in Arkansas last month and it got rejected for debtor name issues. The business is 'Mountain View Equipment LLC' but apparently I'm not formatting it correctly for their system. Tried it with periods after LLC, without periods, with commas - nothing works. The SOS portal keeps kicking it back saying 'debtor name does not match registered entity.' I pulled the exact name from their business search but still no luck. Anyone dealt with Arkansas UCC filings recently? This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and my client is getting impatient. What am I missing here?
Join the conversation
Another Arkansas gotcha - if the LLC was formed recently, make sure it's showing as 'Good Standing' in their system. Sometimes newly formed entities take a few days to fully process and the UCC system won't accept filings against them until the status updates.
Entity is about 2 years old so should be fine there, but good point for future reference.
Always worth checking status first, especially with newer entities.
Update: Got the Articles of Incorporation and you were all right - the name formatting was completely different! It's registered as 'MOUNTAIN VIEW EQUIPMENT, LLC' with a comma before LLC and all caps. Resubmitted this morning and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone, especially for the Certana suggestion - definitely using that for future tricky filings.
Finally, a success story! Arkansas strikes again with their weird formatting requirements.
Nice work getting it sorted. These name matching issues are such a pain but totally avoidable with the right tools.
New York UCC-1 lien filing rejected - debtor name format issue
Having major issues with a New York UCC-1 lien filing that keeps getting rejected by the Secretary of State. We're securing a $150K equipment loan for a manufacturing client, and their legal name on the charter documents is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but the loan agreement shows 'Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC' (abbreviated). Filed the UCC-1 using the charter name exactly, but it was rejected with a cryptic error about 'debtor name discrepancy.' The collateral description covers all equipment, machinery, and fixtures at their Westchester facility. This is holding up the loan closing and my client is getting anxious. Has anyone dealt with NY's specific debtor name requirements for LLC filings? The rejection notice wasn't clear about whether I need to match the loan docs exactly or stick with the charter name format.
Join the conversation
I second the Certana recommendation. Used it last month when I had a similar debtor name mismatch between the charter and loan agreement. Instead of playing guessing games with the SOS, it showed me exactly where the discrepancies were. Saved a ton of time and avoided multiple rejection fees.
How much does something like that cost? These rejection fees are adding up.
Way cheaper than dealing with rejected filings and delayed closings. Plus it catches stuff you might miss manually.
UPDATE: Found the issue! The LLC name in NY's database has a period after 'LLC' - 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC.' - but I filed without the period. Such a tiny detail but apparently it matters. Refiling now with the exact punctuation.
Thanks everyone for the help. This forum saved me a lot of frustration and phone calls to the SOS office.
Glad you got it sorted! Those document checkers really do help catch these tiny but crucial details.
Missouri UCC1 filing rejected twice - debtor name formatting issues
Having a nightmare with Missouri UCC1 filings. Filed electronically through the SOS portal twice now and both got rejected for "debtor name discrepancies." The business name is "ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" but I'm getting conflicting feedback on whether to include the comma before LLC or not. Charter documents show it one way, loan docs another. This is for a $340,000 equipment loan and the bank is getting antsy about perfecting the lien. Anyone dealt with Missouri's specific formatting requirements? The portal error messages are vague and customer service just refers back to the statute.
Join the conversation
Missouri's system is actually pretty good once you know their quirks. The name has to match their entity database exactly, including punctuation and spacing. But you can always call their UCC division if you're still unsure - they're usually helpful about name formatting questions.
I tried calling but got transferred around and never got a clear answer. Maybe I'll try again with the specific entity search results.
Their phone support is hit or miss. Sometimes you get someone who knows UCC stuff, sometimes you don't.
Update us when you refile! Curious if using the exact name from the entity search fixes the issue. I'm dealing with a similar situation in Kansas and wondering if other states have the same strict matching requirements.
Kansas is generally more forgiving than Missouri, but exact name matching is becoming the norm across most states.
Each state has its own quirks. Some are strict about punctuation, others care more about entity type designations like LLC vs L.L.C.
westlaw ucc search showing wrong debtor name matches - filing rejected twice
Has anyone else had issues with westlaw ucc search results not matching what actually gets filed? I've been trying to perfect a security interest for a client's equipment loan and keep getting rejections from Texas SOS. The westlaw search shows the debtor name as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but when I file the UCC-1 with that exact name, it gets rejected for debtor name mismatch. This is the second rejection and I'm running out of time before the loan closes. The collateral is high-value CNC equipment so getting this perfected is critical. Has anyone dealt with discrepancies between westlaw ucc search results and what the Secretary of State actually accepts for debtor names? I'm starting to think there might be a formatting issue or maybe westlaw is pulling from outdated charter information.
Join the conversation
Quick suggestion - try pulling a certificate of good standing for the entity. That will have the most current legal name and entity status. It costs a few dollars but it's worth it to avoid multiple rejections.
Certificate of good standing is definitely the gold standard for current entity information. Should always be your primary source for debtor names.
Agreed. I always get a cert of good standing before filing UCC-1s, especially for larger transactions. The cost is minimal compared to the headache of rejections.
Just wanted to follow up on my earlier suggestion about document verification tools. I tried Certana.ai after someone mentioned it here and it's been a game changer. You just upload your charter document and your UCC-1 draft and it instantly shows you any name mismatches or other issues. Would have saved me hours on my last filing.
It's been spot-on for me. Caught a middle initial that was missing from my debtor name that I never would have noticed manually. The tool is specifically designed for UCC document consistency checks.
I've used similar tools and they're surprisingly good at catching the small details that cause rejections. Much better than trying to manually compare documents.
Joshua Hellan
Don't forget to check if there are any UCC-3 amendments that might clarify the situation. Sometimes the filings get modified after the initial UCC-1 and those changes don't always show up clearly in the basic UCC lien lookup results.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
Good catch. Amendments can completely change the collateral description or debtor information from the original filing.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
Exactly. And if there were amendments, you need to read them in conjunction with the original UCC-1 to understand what's actually covered.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
This is exactly why we always require clean UCC lien lookup results as a closing condition. If there are any questionable filings, we make the seller resolve them before we'll proceed. It's not worth the risk of inheriting someone else's filing mistakes.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
Absolutely. Don't let them push it off until after closing. Get it resolved upfront or walk away from the deal.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
100% agree. We learned that lesson the hard way on a deal a few years ago. Much easier to fix these issues before money changes hands.
0 coins