< Back to UCC Document Community

Malik Robinson

Missouri UCC1 filing rejected twice - debtor name formatting issues

Having a nightmare with Missouri UCC1 filings. Filed electronically through the SOS portal twice now and both got rejected for "debtor name discrepancies." The business name is "ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" but I'm getting conflicting feedback on whether to include the comma before LLC or not. Charter documents show it one way, loan docs another. This is for a $340,000 equipment loan and the bank is getting antsy about perfecting the lien. Anyone dealt with Missouri's specific formatting requirements? The portal error messages are vague and customer service just refers back to the statute.

Missouri can be picky about exact name formatting. Check the Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State - that's your gold standard for the legal entity name. If there's a comma in the charter docs, include it in the UCC-1. Don't go by loan agreements or other secondary sources.

0 coins

This is solid advice. I learned this the hard way on a filing last year.

0 coins

But what if the charter has inconsistencies? I've seen Articles that use different formatting in different sections of the same document.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Ugh Missouri is the worst for this stuff!! I had THREE rejections on a simple continuation because of punctuation. The portal should just tell you what's wrong instead of making you guess. $340k loan sitting there unperfected is stressful.

0 coins

Exactly! The rejection notices are useless. Just says "name discrepancy" with no details about what needs to be fixed.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

I feel your pain. Been there with rejected filings and angry lenders breathing down my neck.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

I actually ran into something similar recently and found a tool that saved me tons of headaches. Certana.ai has this document verification feature where you upload your charter docs and UCC-1 side by side, and it instantly flags any name mismatches or formatting issues. Caught three discrepancies I would have missed manually comparing documents. Just upload the PDFs and it does all the cross-checking automatically.

0 coins

That sounds exactly what I need. How accurate is it for catching these formatting issues?

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

Interesting, never heard of automated document checking for UCC stuff. Does it work with Missouri's specific requirements?

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

It's pretty thorough - checks debtor names, filing numbers, even collateral descriptions against your source documents. Definitely worth trying before another rejection.

0 coins

The key is getting the EXACT name from the Missouri business entity search. Go to the SOS website, search for ABC Manufacturing Solutions, and copy/paste exactly what shows up in their database. That's what their system will match against.

0 coins

Sean Flanagan

•

Good point. The entity search is usually the definitive source for how the state has the name on file.

0 coins

Just checked and the entity search shows "ABC Manufacturing Solutions LLC" without the comma. That's probably why my filings got rejected.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

Wait, are you filing as an individual debtor or organization? If it's an LLC you need to make sure you're using the organization debtor fields, not individual. That can also cause rejections even if the name is right.

0 coins

It's an organization filing. Used the org debtor section both times.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

OK good, just checking. I've seen people mess that up and wonder why their filings keep getting bounced.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

I handle a lot of Missouri filings and they've gotten stricter about name matching in the last couple years. Even spacing matters now. If the charter says "ABC Manufacturing Solutions LLC" with two spaces between words, that's what you need to use.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

That's ridiculous that spacing would matter but you're probably right. These systems are way too literal.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

Technology should make this easier, not harder. Why can't the system just accept reasonable variations of the same name?

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

I agree it's frustrating, but the system matches character by character. One extra space or missing punctuation mark will trigger a rejection.

0 coins

Had a similar issue with a client last month where the loan documents used a shortened version of the business name but the charter had the full legal name. Always go with the charter name for UCC filings - that's what the state recognizes as the official entity name.

0 coins

That's probably exactly what happened here. The loan docs probably used a DBA or shortened version.

0 coins

DBA names can definitely cause confusion. The UCC-1 should always use the legal entity name from formation documents.

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

•

I just went through this exact scenario with a different client. Used Certana's document checker and it immediately showed me that what I thought was the correct name from the loan agreement was actually different from the Articles of Incorporation by one comma. Saved me from another rejection and the client was happy we caught it before filing.

0 coins

OK I'm definitely going to try that document verification tool. Two rejections is already too many.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Smart move. Manual document comparison is error-prone, especially when you're dealing with similar but not identical names.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Missouri's system is actually pretty good once you know their quirks. The name has to match their entity database exactly, including punctuation and spacing. But you can always call their UCC division if you're still unsure - they're usually helpful about name formatting questions.

0 coins

I tried calling but got transferred around and never got a clear answer. Maybe I'll try again with the specific entity search results.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Their phone support is hit or miss. Sometimes you get someone who knows UCC stuff, sometimes you don't.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

Update us when you refile! Curious if using the exact name from the entity search fixes the issue. I'm dealing with a similar situation in Kansas and wondering if other states have the same strict matching requirements.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to refile tomorrow using the exact entity search name format.

0 coins

Kansas is generally more forgiving than Missouri, but exact name matching is becoming the norm across most states.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Each state has its own quirks. Some are strict about punctuation, others care more about entity type designations like LLC vs L.L.C.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today