< Back to UCC Document Community

Carmen Diaz

2017 UCC continuation filing deadline confusion - still valid or expired?

I'm going through some old loan files and found a UCC-1 that was originally filed in 2012. There's a continuation statement from 2017 but I'm second-guessing whether we handled the timing correctly back then. The original financing statement was set to lapse in June 2017, and we filed the UCC-3 continuation in April 2017. Everything looked fine at the time, but now I'm wondering if there were any issues with how we calculated the five-year period. The debtor company has since been acquired and we're trying to clean up the collateral records. Should I be concerned about the validity of that 2017 UCC continuation, or am I overthinking this? The loan is still active and we need to make sure our security interest is properly perfected.

Andre Laurent

•

April 2017 filing sounds right if the original was going to lapse in June 2017. You had a six-month window before expiration to file the continuation. As long as you filed the UCC-3 continuation before the lapse date, you should be good. What state was this filed in? Some states have different quirks but the basic rule is the same.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

This was filed in Ohio. I think we're okay but the acquisition has me second-guessing everything. The new parent company's legal team is asking for documentation on all existing liens.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Ohio follows the standard UCC rules so you should be fine. The continuation extends the effectiveness for another five years from the original lapse date.

0 coins

Wait, hold up. If the original UCC-1 was filed in 2012 and was set to lapse in June 2017, that's only a 5-year window, which is correct. Your April 2017 continuation filing was within the 6-month window before lapse, so that part's good. But have you checked if the debtor name on the 2017 continuation exactly matches what's on the original 2012 filing? Name discrepancies can void the whole thing.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Oh man, I hadn't thought about name variations. The company did do some minor restructuring between 2012 and 2017. Let me pull both documents and compare.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

This is exactly why I always double-check names before filing anything. One missing comma or 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' can mess everything up.

0 coins

Yeah, the name has to be exactly the same or you need to file an amendment first. Don't assume 'close enough' works with UCC filings.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

I've been dealing with similar cleanup issues after acquisitions. One thing that helped me was using Certana.ai's document checker - you can upload both your original UCC-1 and the 2017 continuation as PDFs and it'll instantly flag any inconsistencies between debtor names, filing numbers, or other critical details. Saved me from missing a name discrepancy that would have invalidated our security interest.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Do you just upload the documents and it compares them automatically?

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Exactly. Just drag and drop the PDFs and it runs through all the cross-checks. Much faster than manually comparing documents, especially when you're dealing with multiple filings over several years.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

That sounds really helpful right now. I have about 15 other UCC filings to review for this acquisition and I'm dreading the manual comparison process.

0 coins

Your 2017 continuation should still be effective until 2022, assuming it was filed correctly. But since you mentioned the debtor company was acquired, you might need to consider whether that triggered any name changes that would require an amendment. When did the acquisition happen?

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

The acquisition closed in late 2019. The company kept the same legal name initially but merged into the parent company in 2021.

0 coins

If they merged in 2021 and the legal entity name changed, you definitely need a UCC-3 amendment to update the debtor name. The 2017 continuation might be valid but it's pointing to a debtor that no longer exists.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

•

This is getting complicated. You might want to talk to your legal team about whether you need to start fresh with a new UCC-1 under the current entity name.

0 coins

I hate these post-acquisition UCC cleanups. Had one last year where we found out three different continuation filings had slight name variations and none of them were valid. Ended up having to file new UCC-1s for everything just to be safe.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

That's my worst fear right now. How did you handle the gap period where you weren't properly perfected?

0 coins

We were lucky - the borrower was cooperative and signed new security agreements with retroactive effectiveness clauses. But it was a mess to sort out.

0 coins

2017 was actually a pretty common year for continuation filing issues because a lot of 2012 filings were hitting their five-year mark. I remember the Ohio SOS system was having some glitches around that time too. Did you get a proper filing receipt back then?

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Yes, we have the receipt and confirmation number. The filing was accepted by the system.

0 coins

If Ohio accepted it and gave you a confirmation number, that's a good sign. But still worth double-checking the details.

0 coins

Just to be clear - if your original UCC-1 was filed in 2012, it would lapse 5 years later in 2017. A continuation filed in April 2017 for a June 2017 lapse date is perfectly timed. The continuation extends effectiveness for another 5 years, so it would be good until 2022. But since we're now in 2025, you're past that period unless you filed another continuation in 2022.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Oh no, you're absolutely right. We would have needed another continuation in 2022. I need to check if that was filed. This is turning into a bigger problem than I thought.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Don't panic yet. Check your records for any 2022 filings. If you missed it, you might need to file a new UCC-1, but at least now you know what to look for.

0 coins

Yeah, and if the loan is still active and you need the security interest, better to file a new UCC-1 now than discover the problem later during a default situation.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

This thread is making me nervous about my own filings. I have several 2017 continuations that are probably coming due for another continuation soon. Time to audit my entire portfolio I guess.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

Better safe than sorry. I keep a spreadsheet with all my UCC filing dates and set calendar reminders 6 months before each lapse date.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

That's where tools like Certana.ai really help - you can upload all your UCC documents and it'll flag which ones need attention. Beats manually tracking dozens of different filing dates.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

I'm dealing with something similar but with a 2018 continuation. The borrower changed their business structure twice since then and I'm not sure our filings are still valid. These corporate changes make UCC management so much more complicated.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Exactly! It seems like every deal has some kind of corporate restructuring that affects the UCC filings. Makes me wonder if we should just automatically file amendments every time there's any corporate change, just to be safe.

0 coins

That's probably overkill, but you definitely need to track name changes, mergers, and dissolutions that affect the debtor entity.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

The good news is that Ohio's online UCC system makes it pretty easy to look up your filings and check their status. You can search by filing number or debtor name to see exactly what's on record. Start there before assuming the worst.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Good point. I'll log into the Ohio SOS system tonight and pull up all our filings for this borrower. At least then I'll know exactly what we're dealing with.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

That's the best first step. Once you see what's actually on file, you can figure out what needs to be corrected or updated.

0 coins

And if you find problems, don't delay on fixing them. The longer you wait, the more complicated it gets if there are any enforcement issues.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today