Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Lauren Zeb
Article 9 is your answer but make sure your collateral description is precise. I've seen filings rejected because the equipment description was too vague or didn't match the underlying financing documents.
Lauren Zeb
•Be specific about equipment types, models if possible, and serial numbers for high-value items. 'Restaurant equipment' alone probably won't cut it.
Oscar Murphy
•Serial numbers aren't required for UCC-1 filings but they help avoid disputes later. Article 9 just requires a reasonable description.
Why is everyone making this so complicated? It's Article 9. End of story. File your UCC-1, describe your collateral reasonably, get the debtor name exactly right, and you're done. The other articles are just academic noise.
Easy to say until you lose priority because you ignored fixture filing requirements. The 'complications' exist for good reasons.
Fair point on fixtures, but most equipment financing doesn't involve true fixtures. People worry about edge cases and miss the obvious answer.
Join the conversation
Sophia Russo
One more practical point - keep copies of all your UCC-related documents. When the loan is paid off, make sure the lender files a UCC-3 termination statement. I've seen cases where lenders forgot to terminate and it created issues years later.
Sophia Russo
•You can search your state's UCC database online. Should show both the original filing and the termination.
Emily Sanjay
•This is another area where Certana.ai helps - you can upload the UCC-3 termination against the original UCC-1 to verify everything matches up correctly.
Evelyn Xu
Bottom line - UCC-1 filings are completely standard for equipment loans. It's the legal mechanism that makes secured lending work. Your lender will handle all the paperwork, you just need to provide accurate business information and understand that they have a claim on the collateral until the loan is paid off.
Alicia Stern
•Thanks everyone, this has been really helpful. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the loan now.
Evelyn Xu
•Good luck with your equipment financing! It's really routine stuff once you get past the initial confusion.
Join the conversation
Thanks for posting this - I'm dealing with the exact same issue on a Florida transaction. The name variations are driving me crazy. Going to try some of the suggestions here.
Glad it's helpful! Let me know what works for you. I'm leaning toward trying the automated verification approach.
QuantumLeap
•Definitely worth trying the automated tools. Made this whole process so much easier for me.
Update: I ended up using Certana.ai after reading the recommendations here. Uploaded the Articles of Incorporation and the UCC filings I found manually. It caught two additional name variations I hadn't searched and found one active lien I would have missed. The cross-checking feature showed exactly which documents had matching vs non-matching debtor names. Probably saved me from a major mistake on this deal.
Freya Larsen
•Great to hear it worked for you too. The automatic name variation checking is really helpful for Florida searches.
Emma Wilson
•Good outcome! Florida name variations can definitely trip people up if you're not careful about comprehensive searching.
Join the conversation
Isaiah Cross
Keep detailed records of everything from day one. And use broad but accurate collateral descriptions.
Kiara Greene
Make sure your filing system can easily match original filings to terminations. Organization is everything.
Annabel Kimball
I was skeptical about using third-party tools but Certana.ai actually helped me catch a similar database inconsistency. The verification showed my UCC-1 was filed correctly but the search index had corrupted data. Armed with that proof, I got the state to fix their records.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•That's exactly what these tools are good for - providing documentation to prove system errors.
0 coins
Jean Claude
•Having that kind of verification report definitely helps when dealing with state agencies.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
UPDATE: I contacted the WA Secretary of State office and they confirmed it's a known issue with their search index. They're working on fixing it but said it could take several weeks. In the meantime, they recommended keeping copies of the original filed documents as proof of correct information.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
•Several weeks though? That's a long time to have incorrect search results showing up.
0 coins
Quinn Herbert
•Typical government response time. Frustrating but at least you have documentation that it's their issue.
0 coins