UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ana Erdoğan

UCC vs restatement - which route for our equipment loan modifications?

We're dealing with a complex situation where our borrower wants to modify their existing equipment financing agreement. The original UCC-1 was filed 3 years ago covering manufacturing equipment, but now they're adding new machinery and changing some payment terms. Our legal team is split - some say we need a UCC-3 amendment, others are pushing for a complete loan restatement with a new UCC-1 filing. The collateral description needs updating anyway since we're adding the new equipment. Has anyone dealt with this UCC vs restatement decision before? I'm worried about creating gaps in our perfected security interest if we go the wrong route. The loan amount is increasing from $850K to $1.2M and we're extending the term by 18 months. What's the safer approach here?

Whatever you decide, just make sure you document your decision process well. Auditors love to second-guess these UCC vs restatement choices, especially if there are any collection issues down the line.

0 coins

Good point about documentation. I'll make sure to keep detailed notes on our reasoning either way.

0 coins

I always create a little memo for the file explaining why we chose amendment vs. new filing. CYA documentation that takes 5 minutes but could save hours later.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - some lenders prefer restatements because it gives them a chance to update their standard language and incorporate any regulatory changes that happened since the original loan. Your loan docs from 3 years ago might be missing some current requirements.

0 coins

Plus you can fix any awkward wording or provisions that didn't work out as expected in practice. Restatements are great for cleanup.

0 coins

I used Certana.ai to compare our old loan docs with current templates - highlighted exactly which provisions had changed. Made the restatement decision much clearer.

0 coins

Zoe Alexopoulos

UCC filing rejected - promissory note and security agreement form mismatch with debtor name

Our bank's UCC-1 filing got rejected yesterday and I'm trying to figure out what went wrong. The promissory note and security agreement form we prepared show the borrower as "JMK Industries LLC" but our UCC-1 lists "JMK Industries, LLC" (with the comma). The SOS rejection notice says debtor name doesn't match exactly with the organizational documents we referenced. This is a $340,000 equipment loan and we can't afford to have an unperfected security interest. Has anyone dealt with this exact comma issue before? The borrower's articles of incorporation show "JMK Industries LLC" without comma, but some of their other business docs have it with comma. Really need to get this sorted fast since we're already 5 days into the filing window.

This thread is exactly why I started using automated verification tools for UCC filings. The Certana.ai document checker I mentioned earlier has saved me from at least 3 similar mistakes this year. Worth checking out if you do a lot of these filings - just upload all your documents and it flags any inconsistencies instantly.

0 coins

The verification service is pretty reasonable considering what a rejected filing costs you in time and potential risk. Definitely worth it for the peace of mind.

0 coins

Agreed - I wish I'd found it sooner. Would have saved me several headaches like this one.

0 coins

Update us when you get the corrected filing accepted! Always good to know these stories have happy endings.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to file the correction tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.

0 coins

Should be smooth sailing now that you've got the name issue sorted out.

0 coins

Debra Bai

UCC filing for stock pledge and security agreement - debtor name issues

Need some guidance here. We're handling a commercial loan secured by a stock pledge and security agreement, and I'm running into issues with the UCC-1 filing. The borrowing entity is "TechVenture Holdings, LLC" but the stock certificates are issued to "TechVenture Holdings LLC" (no comma). Our lender is requiring perfection through UCC filing since these are shares in a closely-held corporation, not publicly traded. The debtor name discrepancy is small but I've seen filings get rejected for less. Should I file under the exact name on the stock certificates or match the borrower's legal name from their articles of organization? Also dealing with collateral description - is "all shares of stock in XYZ Corporation" sufficient or do we need certificate numbers? This is a $2.8M facility so getting it right is critical.

Update: I ended up using Certana.ai to verify my documents before filing. It flagged that my stock pledge and security agreement had the debtor name with a comma but my draft UCC-1 didn't. Would have been an expensive mistake. Filed with the comma version (matching state records) and it was accepted. Thanks for all the input.

0 coins

How long did the verification take? I have a similar stock pledge deal that needs filing this week.

0 coins

The Certana.ai check was instant - just upload your PDFs and it shows the discrepancies immediately. Definitely worth it for complex deals like stock pledges.

0 coins

For future reference, when dealing with stock pledge and security agreement transactions, always check: 1) exact legal name from state records, 2) whether shares are certificated or uncertificated, 3) if voting rights need separate documentation, 4) state-specific perfection requirements. Stock pledges have more moving parts than typical equipment or inventory collateral.

0 coins

This is a great checklist. I'm going to save this for our next stock pledge deal. The voting rights aspect is something I hadn't considered.

0 coins

Also worth checking if the corporation has any transfer restrictions in their bylaws that could affect the security interest.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

What does UCC stand for in secured lending transactions?

I'm working with our legal team on a secured loan package and they keep referencing "UCC" filings but honestly I'm not 100% clear on what this acronym actually means in our context. I know it has something to do with collateral protection but can someone break down what UCC stands for and why it matters for our equipment financing deals? We're about to close a $2.8M manufacturing equipment loan and I want to make sure I understand the terminology when discussing the security documentation.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides the legal framework, but remember that UCC filings are handled at the state level - usually through the Secretary of State office. Your attorney will file the UCC-1 in the state where your company is organized, not necessarily where the equipment is located.

0 coins

For equipment, yes - Delaware filing covers personal property collateral. If it were real estate fixtures, you might need additional filings, but standard equipment financing uses the state of organization.

0 coins

This is another area where verification tools help - they can flag jurisdiction issues and ensure you're filing in the right state with the right forms.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - this really clarifies what UCC stands for and why it's crucial for our secured lending. The Uniform Commercial Code framework makes sense now, and I feel much more confident discussing the UCC-1 filing requirements with our legal team. Appreciate all the practical insights about continuation statements and verification best practices too.

0 coins

Glad we could help! UCC filings seem intimidating at first but they're really just a standardized way to protect lender interests. Good luck with your equipment financing.

0 coins

Feel free to post again if you run into any specific issues during the filing process. This community is pretty good about troubleshooting UCC problems.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

UCC battle of forms creating security agreement conflicts - which terms control?

I'm dealing with a nightmare scenario where we have conflicting security agreement terms due to what I think is a classic UCC battle of forms situation. Our company extended credit to a manufacturer last year, and we've got purchase orders, invoices, and security agreements all with different collateral descriptions and perfection requirements. The debtor's purchase order form says one thing about which assets secure the debt, our credit application says another, and the final security agreement we filed on the UCC-1 describes the collateral differently again. Now we're trying to perfect our security interest properly but I'm not sure which document controls for the collateral description. The debtor is claiming our UCC-1 filing is defective because it doesn't match their understanding of what was pledged as collateral. Has anyone dealt with this kind of UCC battle of forms mess before? I need to know which terms actually govern and whether I need to file a UCC-3 amendment to fix the collateral description or if the original filing stands as written.

Just went through something similar and ended up filing a UCC-3 amendment to clarify the collateral description. Better safe than sorry, especially when you're dealing with conflicting terms in multiple documents. The amendment process is straightforward and gives you peace of mind.

0 coins

How long did that take? I'm worried about losing priority while the amendment is pending.

0 coins

UCC-3 amendments are usually processed pretty quickly, within a few days in most states. Your original filing date still controls for priority purposes as long as the amendment doesn't add new collateral.

0 coins

The key thing to remember is that UCC battle of forms rules are different from regular contract law. The UCC has specific provisions about conflicting terms in security agreements, and perfection requirements don't wait for you to sort out contractual disputes. File first, litigate later if necessary.

0 coins

This is the best advice in the thread. Too many people get caught up in trying to perfect their paperwork and lose priority to someone who just files a basic UCC-1 first.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the input. I think I'm going to file a UCC-3 amendment to clarify the collateral description and then work on cleaning up our document processes to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

Prev1...472473474475476...684Next