Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Follow up on the document verification - it really helped me identify the exact issue. Once I knew the debtor name mismatch was the problem, SBA fixed it within 2 weeks. Before that I was just spinning my wheels for months.
Smart approach. Manual document comparison is where most people miss the critical details.
Exactly. The automated cross-check caught stuff I never would have noticed reading through everything myself.
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm sure other EIDL borrowers will run into this same issue.
Debra Bai
•Will do. Thanks everyone for the advice - gives me a clear action plan now.
These EIDL UCC issues are becoming more common as loans get paid off. Good to have solutions documented.
Join the conversation
Yuki Ito
Has anyone used study aids for UCC questions? I'm struggling with these true/false scenarios because they seem so fact-specific.
For contract analysis practice, Certana.ai has been really useful. You can upload sample contracts and it walks through UCC compliance step by step - great for understanding the analysis process.
Yuki Ito
•Thanks for the suggestions! I'll try the flowchart approach first.
Carmen Lopez
The answer should be TRUE based on standard UCC enforceability criteria. Manufacturing equipment contracts are textbook examples of UCC Article 2 application, and with proper documentation, there's no reason it wouldn't be enforceable unless there are special circumstances not mentioned in your question.
Ravi Gupta
•Perfect, that gives me confidence in my analysis. I was overthinking it.
Carmen Lopez
•UCC questions often seem more complex than they are. Stick to the basic requirements and you'll do well.
Join the conversation
What about overkill though? I've seen lenders file 4-5 different UCC-1s on the same collateral because they couldn't decide on the right classification. Seems like a waste of time and money.
The key is being strategic about it. Not every piece of collateral needs multiple filings.
Caleb Stark
•I think 2 filings max on any single piece of collateral. More than that and you're probably overthinking it.
Bottom line for me: cautionary ucc filings are cheap insurance on loans where collateral classification could be disputed. The filing fees are minimal compared to potential loss of lien rights. I'd rather file and not need it than need it and not have filed.
Rachel Clark
•That's becoming our standard approach too. Thanks for all the input - really helpful perspective from everyone.
Sounds like most lenders are on the same page about erring on the side of caution. Good to know we're not alone in the conservative approach.
Join the conversation
Mateo Perez
Have you considered the problem might be with your search strategy rather than the service? Sometimes being too narrow with search terms causes you to miss legitimate variations.
Emma Wilson
•Possibly, but when I broaden the search terms I get hundreds of irrelevant results to sift through.
Mateo Perez
•True, it's a balancing act. Wide enough to catch variations but narrow enough to be manageable.
Aisha Rahman
The bottom line is UCC searches are just one piece of due diligence. You still need good document review processes to catch what the searches miss. No search service is going to be 100% perfect.
That's why automated verification tools are becoming more important. Technology needs to fill the gap between comprehensive searches and manual review.
Aisha Rahman
•Exactly. The future is probably AI-powered document analysis that can spot the inconsistencies humans miss.
Alexander Evans
The security agreement format requirements can be really picky depending on your state. Some states are more forgiving than others when it comes to minor name variations. Have you checked if your state has specific formatting guidelines for UCC filings? That might help you figure out exactly what format they're expecting.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
•Great point about state-specific requirements. Each Secretary of State office can have slightly different standards.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•I found my state's UCC guide online and it had examples of acceptable name formats that really helped me understand what they were looking for.
0 coins
Maya Lewis
UPDATE: I figured it out! The issue was that our security agreement had 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but the state registration actually shows 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC. Such a tiny difference but it was enough to cause the rejection. Thanks everyone for the help - I'm resubmitting with the correct format now.
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
•This is exactly why I always double-check the state database before submitting any UCC filings. Those little details matter so much.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Perfect example of why having a document checker tool would be so valuable. Would have caught that comma issue right away.
0 coins