UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC1 California filing rejected - debtor name formatting issue
Having major headaches with a UCC1 California filing that keeps getting rejected by the SOS. The debtor is a limited partnership and I've tried submitting with "ABC Holdings, LP" and "ABC Holdings Limited Partnership" but both versions got kicked back for name discrepancies. The original loan docs show the entity as "ABC Holdings, L.P." with periods after the L and P. I'm starting to wonder if California has specific formatting requirements I'm missing. This is for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and we're already past our internal deadline. Anyone dealt with similar LP name formatting issues in California recently?
Join the conversation
Capital funding UCC filing getting rejected for debtor name mismatch
I'm dealing with a capital funding situation where our UCC-1 keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. We're trying to secure a $450K equipment loan for our manufacturing expansion and the lender requires perfected security interest before closing. The problem is our business was incorporated as 'Precision Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but we've been operating under 'PMS Manufacturing' for marketing purposes. Filed the UCC-1 using the DBA name and it got kicked back with 'debtor name does not match entity records.' Refiled using the exact corporate name from our articles of incorporation and now they're saying the collateral description is too vague. This is holding up our entire funding timeline and the lender is getting impatient. Anyone dealt with similar capital funding UCC filing headaches? We need this perfected ASAP or we lose the equipment financing deal.
Join the conversation
One more thought - make sure your UCC-1 addendum properly identifies the secured party information. Capital funding deals often involve multiple parties (original lender, servicer, trustee) and getting the secured party name wrong is another common rejection cause that's easy to overlook when you're focused on debtor name and collateral issues.
Great point. Also verify the secured party address matches exactly what they want on file. Some institutional lenders have specific addresses for UCC filings that differ from their general business address.
And double-check if they want individual names or the institution name as secured party. Capital funding agreements sometimes specify this in the loan documents.
Been lurking on this thread because we're dealing with something similar. Our capital funding UCC got rejected three times before we figured out the state wanted the full legal entity name INCLUDING the state of incorporation. So instead of just 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' it had to be 'ABC Manufacturing LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company.' Ridiculous but that's what finally worked.
That's insane. Each state seems to have different quirks for how they want entity names formatted on UCC filings. There really should be more standardization across states.
This is another area where Certana.ai's verification tool helps - it knows the specific formatting requirements for each state's UCC filings and flags when your entity name format doesn't match what that state expects.
UCC filing rejected because master security agreement debtor name doesn't match exactly
Filed a UCC-1 last month for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and got rejected by the SOS office. The rejection notice says the debtor name on my UCC-1 doesn't match the master security agreement exactly. On the MSA it's "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" but I filed it as "Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC" thinking the abbreviation would be fine. Now I'm worried about perfection timing since we're already 3 weeks past closing. Has anyone dealt with debtor name mismatches between the master security agreement and UCC filings? Do I need to refile completely or can I do an amendment? The lender is asking daily for status updates and I'm getting nervous about the whole deal falling apart over this naming issue.
Join the conversation
The 3-week perfection gap is unfortunate but not uncommon with debtor name rejections. Focus on getting the corrected filing done properly rather than rushing and potentially making another mistake. Your lender will appreciate accuracy over speed at this point.
Exactly. Better to take an extra day to get it perfect than to have another rejection and extend the gap even further.
Update us when you get the corrected filing accepted! These debtor name horror stories are educational for all of us who work with master security agreements and UCC filings regularly.
Will do! Filing the corrected UCC-1 today with the exact debtor name from the master security agreement. Lesson learned about never abbreviating entity names.
Good luck! We've all been there with filing rejections - it's part of the learning process unfortunately.
Maine Secretary of State UCC system keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name issues?
Has anyone else had trouble with Maine Secretary of State UCC filings getting rejected for debtor name problems? I've been trying to file a UCC-3 continuation for three weeks now and keep getting rejection notices. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2020 for equipment financing on our restaurant's kitchen equipment, and now we're coming up on the 5-year mark. The debtor name on our original filing shows 'Coastal Bistro LLC' but our current operating agreement has us as 'Coastal Bistro, LLC' (with the comma). I'm not sure if that tiny punctuation difference is what's causing the rejections or if there's something else wrong. The Maine SOS portal doesn't give very specific error messages - just says 'debtor name inconsistency detected.' Our lender is getting nervous about the lapse date approaching and I'm starting to panic. Has anyone dealt with Maine's UCC system quirks before? Do I need to match the exact punctuation from the original filing even if it's technically wrong now?
Join the conversation
Had a similar experience last year with a client's continuation in Maine. After multiple rejections, I ended up using Certana.ai to verify all the document details before resubmitting. The tool caught several small inconsistencies I had missed - not just the debtor name but also some collateral description formatting issues. Made the whole process much smoother and we got approval on the next try.
It's worth trying, especially if you're dealing with complex filings or multiple documents. The automated checking catches things that are easy to miss manually.
I'm skeptical of these automated tools but if it works for UCC document verification I might give it a shot. Manual checking is such a pain.
UPDATE: Just checked the Maine UCC database and found the issue! Our original filing shows 'Coastal Bistro LLC' (no comma) but I've been putting 'Coastal Bistro, LLC' (with comma) on the continuation forms. Going to resubmit with the exact original name. Thanks everyone for the help - this forum is a lifesaver!
Perfect! That should solve your rejection issues. Maine's system should accept the continuation now that the debtor name matches exactly.
Great news! This is exactly the type of mismatch that document verification tools are designed to catch. Good luck with the resubmission.
UCC-11 search results showing wrong debtor info - anyone else seen this?
Been doing UCC-11 searches for about 8 years now and ran into something weird yesterday. Pulled a search on a debtor for due diligence on a $340K equipment loan and the results are showing filings under slightly different variations of the company name. Same EIN, same address, but one filing shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and another shows 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma). The UCC-11 search pulled both but I'm not sure if this means there's a name inconsistency problem or if the search engine is just being thorough. Has anyone dealt with UCC-11 search results that show these kind of minor name variations? Need to figure out if this signals a potential perfection issue before we close.
Join the conversation
This is why I always do comprehensive UCC-11 searches using multiple name variations upfront. Search the exact legal name, then variations with different punctuation, abbreviations, etc. Better to get too much information initially than miss something important.
Same here. I have a checklist of different name formats to search - saves time in the long run.
Smart approach. The few extra minutes on the search end can save hours of verification work later.
Update us on what you find out! I'm curious whether this turns out to be just formatting inconsistency or if there's an actual issue with the filings.
Will do! Planning to run the entity search tomorrow and compare everything systematically.
Looking forward to hearing how it turns out. These kinds of cases are good learning experiences for all of us.
Sean Fitzgerald
Following this thread because I have a California UCC1 to file next week and want to avoid the same issues. Thanks for sharing your experience!
0 coins
Amina Diallo
AuthorDefinitely do the entity search first thing. That seems to be the key takeaway from everyone's advice here.
0 coins
Zara Khan
Also consider using one of those document comparison tools mentioned earlier. Better to catch issues before filing.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
UPDATE: Finally got it accepted! The correct name was 'ABC Holdings, L.P.' with the periods and comma. The SOS entity search showed the exact formatting needed. Thanks everyone for the help - this community is invaluable for navigating these filing headaches.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Awesome news! Nothing beats the relief of seeing that acceptance confirmation after multiple rejections.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
Great outcome. I've bookmarked this thread for future reference - the entity search tip is gold.
0 coins