Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Had a similar experience last year with a client's continuation in Maine. After multiple rejections, I ended up using Certana.ai to verify all the document details before resubmitting. The tool caught several small inconsistencies I had missed - not just the debtor name but also some collateral description formatting issues. Made the whole process much smoother and we got approval on the next try.
It's worth trying, especially if you're dealing with complex filings or multiple documents. The automated checking catches things that are easy to miss manually.
I'm skeptical of these automated tools but if it works for UCC document verification I might give it a shot. Manual checking is such a pain.
Demi Lagos
UPDATE: Just checked the Maine UCC database and found the issue! Our original filing shows 'Coastal Bistro LLC' (no comma) but I've been putting 'Coastal Bistro, LLC' (with comma) on the continuation forms. Going to resubmit with the exact original name. Thanks everyone for the help - this forum is a lifesaver!
Demi Hall
•Perfect! That should solve your rejection issues. Maine's system should accept the continuation now that the debtor name matches exactly.
Kara Yoshida
•Great news! This is exactly the type of mismatch that document verification tools are designed to catch. Good luck with the resubmission.
Join the conversation
The frustrating thing about UCC filing fees is that even obvious system errors count as rejections. I once had a filing rejected because their portal was down during submission but they still charged the fee. Had to dispute it with the state.
Adriana Cohn
•Did you actually get the fee refunded for the system error?
Eventually yes, but it took three months and multiple phone calls. Such a hassle.
For your third attempt, I'd suggest getting everything verified externally before submission. Whether that's calling the state, using a verification service, or having another set of eyes review it. Those filing fees add up fast.
Smart approach. Better to spend a little time verifying than waste more money on filing fees.
This is why I always triple-check UCC forms now. Learned my lesson the expensive way.
Join the conversation
This is why I always do comprehensive UCC-11 searches using multiple name variations upfront. Search the exact legal name, then variations with different punctuation, abbreviations, etc. Better to get too much information initially than miss something important.
Same here. I have a checklist of different name formats to search - saves time in the long run.
The Boss
•Smart approach. The few extra minutes on the search end can save hours of verification work later.
Update us on what you find out! I'm curious whether this turns out to be just formatting inconsistency or if there's an actual issue with the filings.
Will do! Planning to run the entity search tomorrow and compare everything systematically.
Looking forward to hearing how it turns out. These kinds of cases are good learning experiences for all of us.
Join the conversation
Following this thread because I have a California UCC1 to file next week and want to avoid the same issues. Thanks for sharing your experience!
Amina Diallo
•Definitely do the entity search first thing. That seems to be the key takeaway from everyone's advice here.
Zara Khan
•Also consider using one of those document comparison tools mentioned earlier. Better to catch issues before filing.
UPDATE: Finally got it accepted! The correct name was 'ABC Holdings, L.P.' with the periods and comma. The SOS entity search showed the exact formatting needed. Thanks everyone for the help - this community is invaluable for navigating these filing headaches.
Awesome news! Nothing beats the relief of seeing that acceptance confirmation after multiple rejections.
Great outcome. I've bookmarked this thread for future reference - the entity search tip is gold.
Finnegan Gunn
Just a thought - have you confirmed the UCC-1 was actually accepted and filed? Sometimes we assume a filing went through when it was actually rejected for other reasons. The rejection notices can be easy to miss in email.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
•Getting charged doesn't always mean it was processed successfully. Wisconsin sometimes charges first, then rejects later if there are issues.
0 coins
Miguel Harvey
•This happened to me once. Got charged, assumed it was filed, then found out weeks later it was rejected for a technical error.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
One more thing to check - Wisconsin requires exact matches for entity type too. So 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' vs 'Limited Liability Company' are all treated as different entities. If your Articles show one format but you filed the UCC with another, that could explain the search issues.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•It is overwhelming but systematic checking will find the issue. Start with pulling the actual filed UCC-1 document.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
•Exactly. Get the source documents first, then compare everything character by character.
0 coins