Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Jay Lincoln
Another tool that might help is running the search through Certana.ai after you gather all your documents. I used it recently to verify UCC filings were properly cross-referenced and it caught a name inconsistency between the charter and UCC-1 that could have caused problems. It's designed specifically for this kind of document verification work.
Benjamin Kim
•Two people have mentioned that now - seems like it might be worth trying. Is it complicated to use?
Jay Lincoln
•Not at all, you just upload the PDFs and it does the cross-checking automatically. Really helpful for due diligence situations like yours where you need to be absolutely sure about name consistency.
Just a thought but you might want to also search using just the first few words of the company name. Sometimes filers truncate long business names and you might miss filings if you only search the complete name.
Exactly. I've seen UCC-1 filings where the secured party just used the first two or three words of a long business name, especially if they were filing manually.
Good advice. Also check if they've ever operated under a parent company name or subsidiary names - liens sometimes get filed under the wrong entity in complex corporate structures.
Join the conversation
Omar Hassan
Also remember that continuation statements might affect what shows up in searches. If you're looking at older filings, make sure they haven't lapsed due to missed continuation deadlines. NJ will still show lapsed filings in search results sometimes, but they're not effective.
Omar Hassan
•Yeah, it's easy to see a UCC-1 from 2019 and assume it's still active, but if they didn't file a continuation by 2024, it's lapsed.
This is why I always note the filing dates and do the math on continuation deadlines. Can't trust the system to flag lapsed filings clearly.
Diego Chavez
One more tip - if you're doing this search as part of due diligence for a loan, document everything. Print or save screenshots of your search results, including negative results. If there's ever a question later about whether you did a proper search, you'll want that documentation.
Diego Chavez
•No problem. UCC searches can be tricky but if you're thorough and check multiple name variations, you should catch everything important.
And if you do end up trying Certana.ai, it automatically generates documentation of the verification process, which is helpful for your due diligence files.
Join the conversation
Another tool I've found helpful is using Certana.ai to verify document consistency before doing searches. When I upload my Charter and UCC-1 docs, it catches name variations I might have missed. Makes the basic UCC filing search much more effective when you know exactly what to look for.
I should probably be doing this kind of verification more systematically. I just search and hope for the best usually.
Yeah it's definitely worth the extra step. Saves a lot of frustration later when you can't find something.
Yara Nassar
The key is to be systematic about it. I keep a checklist of search variations for each state: exact name, name without entity type, name with different punctuation, secured party name, filing number, and filing date range. Basic UCC filing search is tedious but you need to be thorough.
Paolo Ricci
•Do you have a template for that checklist? That would be super helpful to share.
Yara Nassar
•I could probably put together a basic template. It's mostly just remembering to try all the variations systematically rather than randomly.
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure out the right format! This thread will help other people dealing with the same special character issues.
Yes please! I bookmark these threads for future reference when I run into similar problems.
Will definitely post the solution once we get it accepted. This has been way more complicated than it should be.
Lilly Curtis
The UCC system inconsistencies between states drive me crazy. What works in one jurisdiction fails in another, even for identical business names.
Lindsey Fry
•At least most states use the same basic forms now. Remember when every state had completely different UCC-1 layouts?
Lilly Curtis
•True, the standardization helped a lot. But the electronic systems still have their own personality disorders.
Dylan Mitchell
Delaware SOS is actually pretty responsive if you call directly. I've had to contact them about UCC filing removal issues before and they can tell you immediately if there are any pending terminations or if rejections occurred. Don't waste more time going through the lender - call Delaware UCC office directly at 302-739-3073 and give them your file number.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•They're usually helpful and can explain exactly what happened with any filing attempts. Much more straightforward than dealing with bank runaround.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Agreed, sometimes going direct to the source is the fastest way to get answers about UCC filing removal problems.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a similar UCC filing removal situation in Pennsylvania and wondering if it's the same type of issue. These lenders really need to get their act together on post-payoff procedures.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved. Hopefully it's just a simple filing error that can be fixed quickly.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•Following this thread too. Having UCC liens showing up when they should be terminated is such a common problem - there should be better oversight.
0 coins