Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I know everyone's saying file the amendment, but honestly I think you might be overthinking this. A comma difference probably isn't going to void your entire security interest, especially if both names clearly refer to the same entity. California courts aren't completely unreasonable about minor punctuation variations.
Fair point, I just hate seeing people panic over every minor filing detail. But you're right that the stakes are high enough to justify the precaution.
The problem is you don't know how unreasonable the court will be until you're already in litigation. By then it's too late to fix it.
Update us when you get this resolved. I'm dealing with a similar name discrepancy issue on a Texas filing and curious how California handles these amendments. Do they process them pretty quickly?
Will do. From what I understand California UCC-3 amendments usually process within a few business days if filed online.
Yeah California's online system is actually pretty efficient for amendments. Much better than their initial filing process.
Join the conversation
I've found that searching by secured party name can sometimes reveal filings you miss when searching by debtor name. If you know who their main lenders are, try searching for those lender names and see what comes up. Might catch filings where the debtor name was entered slightly differently.
That's a clever approach I hadn't thought of. Searching from the lender side to cross-verify the results.
Just remember that secured party searches can return a lot of results, so you'll need to filter through them carefully to find the relevant ones.
Final thought - consider reaching out directly to the company's legal counsel and asking for a complete list of all UCC filings they're aware of. They should have records of every filing and can give you the exact names and filing numbers to search for. This can help verify you haven't missed anything important.
That's probably the best approach. I'll ask their attorney for a comprehensive list and then verify each filing in the Illinois system. Thanks for all the suggestions everyone.
Good luck with the acquisition! UCC searches are always stressful but sounds like you're being thorough about it.
Join the conversation
Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned and it found two UCC-1 filings I had completely missed! One was filed under a name variation with different punctuation and another was filed under their old DBA name. Both were still active and would have been senior to our lien. Thanks for the suggestion - probably saved me from a major problem.
That's a relief! Good thing you found those before closing. Senior liens can completely change the risk profile.
Wait that was you who suggested Certana? Thank you so much - that literally saved my deal. I never would have found those filings otherwise.
This is why I always recommend doing comprehensive lien searches through multiple methods. The online portals miss too much stuff to rely on them alone for critical transactions.
Agreed. I always tell people to use every search method available and cross-check everything.
The stakes are too high to trust a single search method. Especially with large commercial deals.
Join the conversation
Update us when you get it filed! I'm curious how it goes since I might need to do something similar soon. These equipment financing situations are getting more common with all the economic uncertainty.
Hope it goes smoothly for you. Equipment recovery can be a real hassle if you don't have your paperwork in order.
Definitely try that Certana thing first if you're nervous about getting it right. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.
Just wanted to echo what others said about using the exact legal entity name. I once had a UCC-1 rejected because I used "Inc." instead of "Incorporated" in the debtor name. The systems are very picky about exact matches to state records.
That's ridiculous but totally believable. The whole system needs to be more forgiving of minor variations.
At least most states show you the exact format when you do a business name search. That helps avoid those kinds of mistakes.
Camila Castillo
Been doing UCC filings for 8 years and name rejections under § 9.506 still catch me off guard sometimes. The statute says minor errors don't make a filing ineffective, but "minor" is in the eye of the beholder apparently. Sarah J vs Sarah Jane shouldn't matter but here we are.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
•Common sense doesn't always align with UCC search logic unfortunately. The automated systems are pretty literal.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•This is why I always tell people to think like a computer when preparing UCC names. Exact matches only.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
Quick update - we refiled with the exact driver's license name and it was accepted same day. Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to implement better name verification procedures going forward to avoid this headache again.
0 coins
Nathaniel Stewart
•Smart move on the verification procedures. Those document checking tools really do help prevent these issues.
0 coins
Ethan Scott
•Good to hear you got it sorted quickly. These name rejections are always frustrating but at least the fix is straightforward.
0 coins