UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ava Johnson

•

Has anyone tried reaching out to the Colorado Secretary of State office about this? Seems like they should know their system is showing incomplete results.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Typical government response. Just pass the liability to us.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

So we're supposed to just guess what liens might exist? This is insane.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

I think your best bet is to assume the highest number of liens you found is probably closest to accurate and investigate each one individually. Pull the actual filing documents for each lien to see what they cover and when they expire. That's the only way to get a complete picture in Colorado.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

Welcome to Colorado UCC searches. They're all like this unfortunately.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

This is exactly why tools like Certana.ai are so useful - you can upload all those individual documents and it will automatically organize them and flag any issues or gaps.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

One thing to watch out for - make sure you're searching all the right jurisdictions. If the company does business in multiple states, there could be UCC filings in other states too. The equipment location might determine where liens need to be filed.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Good point. Equipment can be tricky because it can move between states and filing requirements vary.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Usually you search where the debtor is organized/located, but for equipment it can get complicated if it moves around.

0 coins

Bottom line - don't take the seller's word for it that these are all just 'incorrect names.' Do your own verification through official records, get copies of the actual filings, and consider professional help if the amounts are significant. Better to be overly cautious than miss something important.

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

Absolutely agree. I've seen too many deals go sideways because someone assumed name variations were harmless.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Yeah, and even if they are the same entity, you still need to deal with the liens before the purchase. Name verification is just the first step.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

•

Just tried filing and got the same errors. This is ridiculous for a state system. How are we supposed to meet filing deadlines when their technology doesn't work? There has to be some accountability here.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

You can file a complaint with the Secretary of State's office about technical issues. Probably won't fix anything but at least they'll know about the problems.

0 coins

I doubt they care. They've been getting complaints about this system for years with no improvements.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Success! Finally got my continuation filed after trying the Certana.ai verification first to make sure everything was perfect, then using Chrome in incognito mode around 9 PM. Took 4 attempts but it went through. Thanks everyone for the tips!

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

Incognito mode is smart - eliminates any cached data that might interfere with the portal.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Glad the Certana.ai verification helped! Always good to double-check documents before dealing with Maryland's portal.

0 coins

Another vote for document verification before filing. Used Certana.ai on a similar multi-lender deal and it caught a debtor name discrepancy between the mortgage and UCC docs that would have caused major headaches.

0 coins

These name matching issues are brutal. One small difference and suddenly your UCC filing doesn't perfect your security interest.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

The verification tools are worth it just for peace of mind. Upload everything and let it check for inconsistencies automatically.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Bottom line - make sure the equipment lender knows they're taking subordinate position to existing mortgage for fixture value, but they should have priority for any removable value. Price and structure the deal accordingly.

0 coins

That makes sense. I'll make sure both lenders understand the priority structure before we move forward. Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations.

0 coins

Smart approach. Better to have everyone's expectations aligned upfront than deal with surprises later.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Connecticut is actually better than some states I've dealt with. At least their online portal is functional and up-to-date. Some states still require paper searches or have systems that go down constantly.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

That's somewhat reassuring. I was starting to think CT was particularly difficult.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

No, CT is decent. The debtor name issue you're facing is pretty universal across all states. It's just the nature of UCC searches.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Final thought - consider getting a professional UCC search company to run a comprehensive search if this is a significant purchase. They have experience with debtor name variations and know the common pitfalls in each state.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

There are several good ones, but honestly I've been impressed with Certana.ai's verification tool. You can upload your own search results and it cross-checks everything automatically. Might be faster and cheaper than hiring a search company.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Second the recommendation for getting professional help on complex searches. The cost is usually worth it compared to the risk of missing something important.

0 coins

Prev1...464465466467468...684Next