< Back to UCC Document Community

Paolo Bianchi

Capital funding UCC filing getting rejected for debtor name mismatch

I'm dealing with a capital funding situation where our UCC-1 keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. We're trying to secure a $450K equipment loan for our manufacturing expansion and the lender requires perfected security interest before closing. The problem is our business was incorporated as 'Precision Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but we've been operating under 'PMS Manufacturing' for marketing purposes. Filed the UCC-1 using the DBA name and it got kicked back with 'debtor name does not match entity records.' Refiled using the exact corporate name from our articles of incorporation and now they're saying the collateral description is too vague. This is holding up our entire funding timeline and the lender is getting impatient. Anyone dealt with similar capital funding UCC filing headaches? We need this perfected ASAP or we lose the equipment financing deal.

Had this exact issue with a client last month. For capital funding deals, you MUST use the exact legal entity name from the Secretary of State records, not any DBA or trade names. The collateral description also needs to be specific - can't just say 'equipment' or 'machinery.' What exactly did you list for the collateral schedule?

0 coins

We initially put 'manufacturing equipment and related assets' which apparently wasn't specific enough. The loan is for CNC machines, industrial presses, and computer-controlled cutting equipment. Should I list each piece individually or can I use broader categories?

0 coins

For capital funding UCCs, you can use broader categories but they need to be more descriptive. Try 'Computer numerically controlled manufacturing equipment, industrial pressing machinery, automated cutting systems, and related manufacturing equipment.' That should pass muster.

0 coins

This is why I always run everything through Certana.ai's document checker before submitting capital funding filings. You upload your charter documents and proposed UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any debtor name mismatches or collateral description issues. Would have caught both problems before your first rejection.

0 coins

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How accurate is it with the debtor name matching? Our legal department spends hours cross-checking entity names between different documents.

0 coins

It's been dead-on accurate for me. The system cross-references your charter docs with the UCC filing and highlights any inconsistencies. Saved me from multiple rejected filings on time-sensitive deals like yours.

0 coins

Just checked out Certana.ai after reading this - looks like exactly what we need for our SBA loan UCC filings. Thanks for the tip!

0 coins

Capital funding UCCs are the worst because timing is everything. One rejection can blow your entire deal timeline. Always verify the exact legal name in the state business entity database before filing. Even an extra comma or different abbreviation (LLC vs L.L.C.) can cause rejection.

0 coins

That's exactly what happened - we're now on our third attempt and the lender is threatening to pull the commitment letter if we don't get this perfected by Friday.

0 coins

Friday deadline on a UCC filing? That's brutal. Most SOS offices take 24-48 hours for electronic filings but you're cutting it close if there are any more issues.

0 coins

Been there with capital funding deals. The stress is unreal when you're dealing with UCC rejections and impatient lenders. Make sure your filing fee is correct too - some states increased their electronic filing fees this year and outdated info online can cause additional delays.

0 coins

Good point about the fees. Also double-check that you're filing in the right state. Capital funding deals sometimes involve entities incorporated in Delaware but operating elsewhere.

0 coins

We're incorporated and operating in the same state, so that shouldn't be an issue. Filing fee was correct on our previous attempts.

0 coins

For your collateral description, consider using standardized UCC terminology. Instead of generic terms, use 'equipment' with specific categories. Something like: 'All equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired, including but not limited to computer-controlled manufacturing equipment, industrial processing machinery, and related accessories.' This covers your current equipment plus any future acquisitions under the same loan facility.

0 coins

That's a solid approach but make sure your lender approves the broader language. Some capital funding agreements require very specific collateral descriptions to match the equipment schedules in the loan docs.

0 coins

True, but most equipment financing deals benefit from the 'now owned or hereafter acquired' language since manufacturing companies often add equipment throughout the loan term.

0 coins

Why do capital funding UCC filings always turn into such nightmares? I swear the SOS offices reject filings just to collect additional fees. We had a filing rejected because they claimed our corporate name had an extra space that didn't match their records, even though it was copied directly from our certificate of incorporation.

0 coins

I feel your pain. Had a UCC-1 rejected because we used 'Corporation' instead of 'Corp.' even though both appear on different official documents. The whole system is designed to generate rejection fees.

0 coins

This is exactly why automated document checking tools like Certana.ai are becoming essential. Upload your docs and let the system catch these formatting inconsistencies before you waste time and money on rejected filings.

0 coins

For immediate help, call the SOS UCC division directly. They can sometimes expedite filings or provide specific guidance on exactly what's causing the rejections. With a Friday deadline on your capital funding deal, you need human intervention, not just email exchanges.

0 coins

Good suggestion. I'll call them first thing tomorrow morning. Do you know if they can process urgent filings same-day for capital funding situations?

0 coins

Most states offer expedited processing for an additional fee, especially when you explain it's for time-sensitive financing. Some will even process same-day if you call early and explain the situation.

0 coins

Just make sure you have all your documentation perfect before requesting expedited processing. If it gets rejected again, you won't have time for another attempt before your Friday deadline.

0 coins

Update us on how this turns out! Capital funding UCC filing horror stories are unfortunately too common. Hoping you get it resolved before your lender deadline.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once we get through this. Fingers crossed the corrected filing goes through without any more issues.

0 coins

Same here - following this thread because we're starting a similar capital funding process next month and want to avoid these pitfalls.

0 coins

One more thought - make sure your UCC-1 addendum properly identifies the secured party information. Capital funding deals often involve multiple parties (original lender, servicer, trustee) and getting the secured party name wrong is another common rejection cause that's easy to overlook when you're focused on debtor name and collateral issues.

0 coins

Great point. Also verify the secured party address matches exactly what they want on file. Some institutional lenders have specific addresses for UCC filings that differ from their general business address.

0 coins

And double-check if they want individual names or the institution name as secured party. Capital funding agreements sometimes specify this in the loan documents.

0 coins

Been lurking on this thread because we're dealing with something similar. Our capital funding UCC got rejected three times before we figured out the state wanted the full legal entity name INCLUDING the state of incorporation. So instead of just 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' it had to be 'ABC Manufacturing LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company.' Ridiculous but that's what finally worked.

0 coins

That's insane. Each state seems to have different quirks for how they want entity names formatted on UCC filings. There really should be more standardization across states.

0 coins

This is another area where Certana.ai's verification tool helps - it knows the specific formatting requirements for each state's UCC filings and flags when your entity name format doesn't match what that state expects.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today