Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Leo Simmons
Just to clarify - when you say the system is rejecting it for debtor name discrepancies, are you getting this error during the online filing process, or are you submitting paper forms? The error handling is different for each method.
Oliver Cheng
•I'm filing online through their electronic system. The rejection comes back within a few hours with just a generic 'debtor name mismatch' error.
Leo Simmons
•Ok, that's actually good news. The online system is usually more specific about what's wrong. You might want to try calling their UCC department directly and asking them to walk through the exact error.
Lindsey Fry
UPDATE: I finally got this resolved! Turns out the original UCC-1 had 'Midwest Construction Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but I was filing the continuation as 'Midwest Construction Solutions LLC' without the comma. Such a tiny difference but it was enough to cause the rejection. Thanks to everyone who suggested checking the original filing character by character.
Perfect example of why that document verification tool is so useful. It would have caught that comma difference immediately.
Kevin Bell
•This is why I hate these county systems. A missing comma shouldn't be able to void a lien on $340K worth of equipment. But I'm glad you got it sorted out!
Join the conversation
Check if the company has any DBAs or trade names registered. Sometimes UCC filings get indexed under those names instead of the legal entity name.
Good call. I'll check the NH business registry for any DBAs.
Also check for any corporate name changes in the past 5 years. The original UCC might be under an old name.
Whatever you do, document everything for your due diligence file. Screenshot the search results, note the dates and search terms used. If something goes wrong later, you'll need to show you did reasonable searches.
Smart. I learned that lesson the hard way on a deal that went sideways.
This is why I always recommend certified searches for high-stakes transactions. The extra cost is worth the peace of mind.
Join the conversation
The practical impact of UCC 1-203 on your filing strategy is pretty straightforward - be accurate, be honest, and be reasonable. Don't try to game the system or hide information. For your equipment deal, make sure your UCC-1 description aligns with your security agreement and that you're not overstating what you're claiming as collateral.
Thanks, that's really helpful. I think I was overcomplicating this in my head. It sounds like following standard best practices should cover the 1-203 requirements.
Exactly. UCC 1-203 is more about preventing abuse than creating new technical requirements. If you're doing things the right way anyway, you're probably already complying with the good faith standard.
One thing I'd add about UCC 1-203 and equipment financing - the good faith requirement can become relevant if you need to do a fixture filing. If any of your manufacturing equipment becomes fixtures, you need to handle that filing properly and in good faith, which might mean coordinating with real estate lenders or ensuring proper notice to the property owner.
Right, and if you know equipment will become fixtures but don't handle the fixture filing properly, that could be seen as bad faith under 1-203. Better to address it upfront.
Fixture filings are tricky anyway - adding the good faith requirement makes it even more important to get them right the first time.
Join the conversation
This is why I hate equipment financing transactions with multiple parties involved. Too many opportunities for the original debtor identification to get screwed up.
Emma Davis
•At least OP is being proactive about it. I've seen deals where nobody realizes there's an original debtor issue until there's already a problem.
LunarLegend
Bottom line - you need to determine who actually granted the security interest in the equipment originally. That's your 9-102(a)(65) original debtor. If your current UCC filing doesn't reflect that entity as the debtor, you'll need to file amendments to correct it. Don't risk a $340K perfection gap over debtor name issues.
Mei Zhang
•Thanks everyone - this gives me a much clearer picture of what I need to research. Going to pull all the original documents and trace through the security interest grants.
Smart approach. And definitely consider using a document verification service to double-check everything once you think you've got it sorted out.
Aileen Rodriguez
File immediately, run comprehensive searches, document everything, and consider getting title insurance if available for this type of situation. The gap in perfection is a real concern but quick action minimizes the risk.
0 coins
Zane Gray
•Didn't know title insurance was available for UCC perfection gaps. That's interesting.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
•It's not common but some insurers offer coverage for certain secured transaction risks. Worth exploring for high-value loans.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
Whatever you do, don't wait. Every day increases the risk that someone else files against your debtor. Alabama processes UCC-1s quickly so get it done today.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•Thanks everyone. Filing the new UCC-1 this afternoon and will run searches to check for intervening liens. Appreciate all the guidance.
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•Good luck! Let us know how it goes. These situations are stressful but usually work out if you act fast.
0 coins