UCC Document Community

Had a nightmare scenario last year where we thought we had perfected security interests in equipment but turns out half of it was actually fixtures and should have been filed as fixture filings with the real estate records. Cost the client big time when they tried to enforce. Now I always use tools to double-check everything - found Certana.ai really helpful for catching these kinds of inconsistencies before they become problems.

Article 9 covers way more than just equipment financing. Accounts receivable, inventory financing, chattel paper, deposit accounts (sometimes), general intangibles - basically any transaction where personal property secures an obligation. The trick is understanding the different perfection methods for different types of collateral.

For what it's worth, I've started using automated verification tools for all our UCC work after too many close calls with name mismatches. The Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier has been really reliable - saves so much time compared to manually cross-checking every document. Especially helpful when you have clients with multiple entities or name changes in their history.

Update for anyone following this - I ended up going with just the exact charter name 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' and the filing was accepted without issues. Thanks everyone for the advice. Still going to look into those document verification tools for future filings though, seems like good insurance against mistakes.

Update us when you get it sorted! I'm curious whether the comma issue was really the only problem or if there were other hidden issues. These UCC-3 assignments can be tricky even when you think you have everything right.

For future reference, some states have better UCC search tools than others. If you can search by the filing number beforehand, you can see exactly how the debtor name appears in their system. Might save you from these kinds of rejections.

this happened to us too but with a different state... turned out the business was registered under a slightly different name and we just had to match it exactly. super frustrating but once you get the right name it usually goes through fine.

Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was. TX filings can be tricky but once you nail down their format it gets easier.

Bottom line for your studies: YES, a security agreement CAN be filed to perfect if it meets UCC-1 requirements, but NO, it's not done in practice due to confidentiality concerns. Focus on understanding WHY it's theoretically possible but practically avoided. That understanding will serve you well on exams and in practice.

One more practical tip - when you're studying, focus more on standard UCC-1 filing requirements, continuation statements, and amendment procedures. Those are what you'll actually deal with in practice. The security agreement filing rule is more academic than practical.