Oklahoma County UCC filing system keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name exact match issues
I'm dealing with a nightmare situation with Oklahoma County UCC filings and hoping someone here has dealt with this before. I need to file a UCC-3 continuation for a client's equipment loan that expires next month, but the system keeps rejecting it for debtor name discrepancies. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2020 with the debtor name as 'Midwest Construction Solutions LLC' but now the county system is saying it doesn't match their records exactly. I've triple-checked the filing number and everything looks correct on my end. The collateral is heavy equipment worth about $340K so we absolutely cannot let this lapse. Has anyone else run into similar issues with Oklahoma County's UCC system being overly picky about debtor name formatting? I'm starting to panic because we're getting close to the 6-month deadline and I don't want to explain to my client why their lien just became unperfected because of some database formatting issue.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Taylor To
Oklahoma County can be really finicky about exact character matches. Even something like an extra space or different punctuation can cause rejections. Have you tried pulling the original UCC-1 filing to see exactly how they have the debtor name formatted in their system? Sometimes what you think matches perfectly actually has subtle differences.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•That's a good point. I requested a copy of the original filing but it's taking forever to get back from them. This is so frustrating when you're working against a deadline.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
•I always do this first thing now after getting burned on a similar situation. The original filing is gospel - you have to match it exactly character for character.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
UGH this is exactly why I hate dealing with county-level UCC systems. They're all different and they're all terrible in their own special way. Oklahoma County's system is particularly notorious for being picky about formatting.
0 coins
Savannah Glover
•Tell me about it. I had one rejection because there was a period after 'LLC' in the original but I didn't include it in the continuation. Cost me an extra week of stress.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
•Exactly! And their error messages are completely unhelpful. They just say 'debtor name mismatch' without telling you what they actually have on file.
0 coins
Felix Grigori
I ran into something similar last year and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload both your original UCC-1 and the continuation you're trying to file, and it will flag any inconsistencies between the documents. It caught a subtle difference in how the debtor name was formatted that I completely missed. Saved me from a potential disaster when the filing deadline was approaching.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•That sounds really helpful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs?
0 coins
Felix Grigori
•Yeah, it's pretty straightforward. You upload your original UCC-1 and then your UCC-3 continuation, and it automatically cross-checks debtor names, filing numbers, and other critical details. It highlighted the exact character differences I was missing.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•This is brilliant. I wish I had known about this tool months ago when I was dealing with a similar mess in Cleveland County.
0 coins
Max Reyes
Have you considered calling Oklahoma County directly? Sometimes talking to an actual person can help clarify what exactly is causing the rejection. They might be able to tell you the exact formatting they have on file.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•I tried calling but got transferred around and never got a clear answer. The person I finally talked to just said to 'make sure the name matches exactly' which wasn't helpful at all.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
•That's so typical. County clerks are usually helpful but they don't always understand the technical details of UCC filings.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
Wait, are you absolutely certain you have the right filing number? I've seen cases where people were looking at the wrong UCC-1 entirely, especially if the debtor has multiple filings. Double-check that the filing number on your continuation matches the original UCC-1 for that specific collateral.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•Yes, I'm certain. The filing number is correct and matches the original loan documents. It's definitely a debtor name formatting issue.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Good, just wanted to rule out the obvious stuff. The name formatting thing is such a pain with these county systems.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
This is one of those situations where having a backup plan is crucial. If you can't get the continuation filed in time, you might need to consider filing a new UCC-1 and then terminating the old one. It's not ideal but it's better than having an unperfected lien.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•That's a good backup plan. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that but at least I have options if the continuation keeps getting rejected.
0 coins
Taylor To
•Just make sure to coordinate the timing carefully if you go that route. You don't want any gap in perfection.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
•Absolutely. File the new UCC-1 first, make sure it's accepted, then file the termination for the old one.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
I feel your pain. Had a similar issue with a fixture filing in Oklahoma County last year. Turned out they had an extra comma in the debtor name that wasn't visible in their online search results but was in their actual database. Super frustrating.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•That's exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. These tiny formatting differences that are almost impossible to catch.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
•Yeah, and it only became clear when I got the certified copy of the original filing. The formatting was completely different from what I expected.
0 coins
Lilly Curtis
Another option is to use a UCC service company that specializes in Oklahoma County filings. They usually have relationships with the county offices and know exactly how to format things to avoid rejections. Might be worth the cost if you're running out of time.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•That's a good suggestion. Do you have any recommendations for companies that work specifically with Oklahoma County?
0 coins
Lilly Curtis
•I've had good luck with a few local services, but I'd also suggest trying that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. It might solve your problem without needing to hire a service company.
0 coins
Leo Simmons
Just to clarify - when you say the system is rejecting it for debtor name discrepancies, are you getting this error during the online filing process, or are you submitting paper forms? The error handling is different for each method.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
•I'm filing online through their electronic system. The rejection comes back within a few hours with just a generic 'debtor name mismatch' error.
0 coins
Leo Simmons
•Ok, that's actually good news. The online system is usually more specific about what's wrong. You might want to try calling their UCC department directly and asking them to walk through the exact error.
0 coins
Lindsey Fry
UPDATE: I finally got this resolved! Turns out the original UCC-1 had 'Midwest Construction Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but I was filing the continuation as 'Midwest Construction Solutions LLC' without the comma. Such a tiny difference but it was enough to cause the rejection. Thanks to everyone who suggested checking the original filing character by character.
0 coins
Taylor To
•So glad you got it figured out! That comma difference is exactly the kind of thing that drives people crazy.
0 coins
Felix Grigori
•Perfect example of why that document verification tool is so useful. It would have caught that comma difference immediately.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
•This is why I hate these county systems. A missing comma shouldn't be able to void a lien on $340K worth of equipment. But I'm glad you got it sorted out!
0 coins