< Back to UCC Document Community

Oliver Schulz

Arizona SOS UCC search showing wrong debtor name on continuation - filing rejected twice

Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. Our law firm handles equipment financing and we filed a UCC-3 continuation for a client's heavy machinery collateral back in November. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2020 with the debtor name as 'Mountain View Construction LLC' but when I run the Arizona SOS UCC search now, it's showing up as 'Mountainview Construction LLC' (no space). Our continuation got rejected because of the name mismatch and I've tried refiling it twice with different variations but keep getting bounced back. The SOS office says the debtor name on the continuation has to match exactly what's in their system, but I'm looking at our original filing documents and they clearly show the space. Has anyone else run into this with Arizona filings? The lapse date is coming up fast and I'm starting to panic that we're going to lose perfection on a $850K loan. What's the best way to handle debtor name discrepancies when the state system seems to have changed the original entry?

This is actually pretty common with Arizona. Their indexing system sometimes strips spaces or consolidates them during data entry. First thing - pull up the actual UCC-1 image from the SOS database, not just the search results. The search results can display differently than what's actually on file. If the original filing shows the space, you might need to file an amendment first to correct the debtor name, then do your continuation.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Wait, can you even amend a debtor name that close to lapse? I thought you had to do continuations first to keep the filing active.

0 coins

You can file both simultaneously in Arizona. Amendment to fix the name issue and continuation to extend the term. Just make sure the amendment references the original file number correctly.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Had the exact same problem last year with an Arizona filing. The search function is honestly garbage - it doesn't handle business name variations well at all. What worked for me was calling the SOS filing division directly and asking them to do a manual search. Sometimes they can find filings that don't show up in the online search. Also, try searching with different combinations - with the space, without the space, and maybe even partial matches.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

This! The Arizona search is so finicky. I've seen it miss filings because of a comma vs period difference.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

I tried calling but got transferred three times and nobody could give me a straight answer. Might try again tomorrow.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Keep trying. Sometimes you get someone who actually knows what they're doing. Ask specifically for the UCC filing unit.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

Before you stress too much about refiling, I'd suggest running your documents through something like Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload both your original UCC-1 and the continuation to see exactly where the name discrepancies are. It'll highlight any inconsistencies between the documents and might catch other issues you haven't noticed. I used it last month when I had a similar debtor name problem and it saved me from filing incorrect amendments.

0 coins

Never heard of that service but sounds useful. Is it expensive?

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

It's pretty reasonable and way cheaper than having filings rejected multiple times. Just upload PDFs and it does the comparison automatically.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

OMG this is giving me flashbacks to my own Arizona filing disaster. Spent WEEKS going back and forth with them over a debtor name that had 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated'. Finally had to get the debtor to provide an official business registration certificate showing the exact legal name. Arizona is probably the most particular state I've dealt with for UCC filings.

0 coins

Arizona and Delaware are the worst for this stuff. At least Delaware has better customer service.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Absolutely. Arizona acts like you're asking them to move mountains when you need help with a simple name verification.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

This is exactly what I'm dealing with! Did you end up having to refile everything?

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Check the business entity records too. Sometimes the issue isn't with the UCC system but with how the business name is registered with the Arizona Corporation Commission. If the LLC changed its name or there was an error in the original registration, that could explain the discrepancy. You might need to get an updated certificate of good standing showing the current legal name.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

Good point. Corporate name changes can really mess up UCC filings if you don't catch them early.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

I'll check that. The client swears they never changed the name but maybe there was some kind of administrative correction.

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

Whatever you do, don't let that continuation lapse! Even if you have to file with multiple name variations to cover your bases. You can always file terminations later for the incorrect ones, but losing perfection on an $850K loan is career-ending stuff. I've seen lawyers get sued for way less.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

This is solid advice. Better safe than sorry with continuation deadlines.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Yeah, that's definitely my biggest fear right now. The client is already asking questions about why this is taking so long.

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

Just be transparent with them about the state system issues. Most clients understand that government bureaucracy can be unpredictable.

0 coins

Have you tried searching by the file number instead of debtor name? Sometimes that's more reliable than the name search function. Also, Arizona allows you to request certified copies of filed documents - might be worth getting a certified copy of the original UCC-1 to have the official version of the debtor name.

0 coins

Sean O'Brien

•

File number searches are definitely more accurate in most states.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

I have the file number and can pull up the filing, it's just that the continuation keeps getting rejected for the name mismatch.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

I ran into something similar with document inconsistencies and ended up using Certana.ai to double-check everything before refiling. It actually caught a subtle difference in how the collateral was described between my UCC-1 and UCC-3 that I never would have noticed. Might be worth running a check before you file again - could save you another rejection.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

That's smart. Better to catch errors before filing than after getting rejected.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

At this point I'm willing to try anything. These rejections are making me look incompetent to the client.

0 coins

Pro tip: when you refile, include a cover letter explaining the discrepancy and referencing the original file number. Sometimes the filing staff will actually read it and understand what you're trying to do. Won't guarantee acceptance but it can't hurt.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Do cover letters actually help with electronic filings though?

0 coins

Some states have comment fields or allow attachments. Worth checking if Arizona does.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Colorado and curious to see what ends up working for you.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Will do. Hopefully I'll have good news by next week.

0 coins

Aisha Ali

•

Following this thread too. These name matching issues seem to be getting worse across all states.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today