UCC filings Colorado - debtor name rejection nightmare
I'm dealing with a complete mess on a UCC filing Colorado situation and honestly don't know where to turn. We had a UCC-1 that was filed back in 2020 for equipment financing on some construction machinery. The debtor was listed as 'Rocky Mountain Equipment Solutions LLC' which matched their articles of incorporation exactly at the time. Fast forward to last month - we go to file a UCC-3 continuation because the 5-year deadline is coming up in March. The Colorado SOS system REJECTED our continuation filing saying the debtor name doesn't match their current records. Turns out the company did some kind of name change in 2022 to 'Rocky Mountain Equipment & Logistics LLC' but nobody told us. Now I'm sitting here with a potentially invalid security interest if I can't get this continuation filed properly. The original UCC-1 shows one name, their current articles show another name, and the SOS portal is giving me conflicting information about which name to use. Has anyone dealt with this kind of debtor name mismatch issue in Colorado? I'm worried we're going to lose our perfected security interest over a technicality that wasn't even our fault. The loan amount is substantial and my boss is breathing down my neck about this. Any advice on how to handle UCC filings Colorado when the debtor has changed their legal name?
33 comments


Eli Butler
This is actually more common than you'd think with Colorado UCC filings. The key issue is that your continuation needs to reference the EXACT debtor name from the original UCC-1, not their current name. The Colorado SOS system can be finicky about this. You should be filing the UCC-3 continuation using 'Rocky Mountain Equipment Solutions LLC' since that's what's on the original financing statement. The name change doesn't invalidate your original filing.
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
•Wait, are you sure about that? I thought Colorado required the current legal name for continuations. This is so confusing - every state seems to have different rules.
0 coins
Eli Butler
•I'm pretty confident on this one. The continuation is meant to continue the EXISTING filing, so it has to match exactly. If you want to update the debtor name, that would be a separate UCC-3 amendment after the continuation is processed.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
Been through this exact scenario in Colorado. The system definitely wants the original debtor name for continuations. But here's the thing - you might want to consider doing BOTH a continuation AND an amendment to cover all your bases. File the continuation with the original name first, then once that's accepted, file a UCC-3 amendment to update the debtor name to reflect their current legal status.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•That makes sense but sounds expensive - aren't we talking about double filing fees? And what's the timing on something like that?
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
•Yeah, you're looking at two separate filing fees, but considering the loan amount you mentioned, it's probably worth the extra cost to ensure your security interest stays perfected. I'd do the continuation first, wait for acceptance, then immediately file the amendment.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•Actually, I just went through something similar and found this tool called Certana.ai that helps verify UCC document consistency. You can upload your original UCC-1 and the proposed continuation to check if everything aligns properly before you submit. Saved me from making a costly mistake with debtor name variations.
0 coins
Sofia Price
Colorado SOS is notorious for being strict about debtor names! I've had filings rejected for the smallest inconsistencies - like missing a comma or having 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' You need to pull up the exact original UCC-1 filing and copy the debtor name character for character. Don't trust your memory or even your own records - go straight to the source.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•This is why I hate dealing with UCC stuff. Too many technicalities that can screw you over. Why can't they just make it simple?
0 coins
Sofia Price
•I get the frustration, but the rules exist for good reasons. Secured creditors need certainty about what they're searching for and what they're perfecting against.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
Hold up - you mentioned the name change happened in 2022. Did you check if the company filed any documents with the Colorado Secretary of State that might have created a bridge between the old and new names? Sometimes there are merger documents or amendments that can help establish the connection between the two entities.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•I hadn't thought of that. I'll need to do some digging in their corporate records. Good point about checking for merger or amendment documentation.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•Definitely worth checking. If there's a clear paper trail showing the name change, that might help if you run into any issues later. Document everything!
0 coins
Jackson Carter
I'm dealing with a similar situation but in reverse - we have a continuation that was filed with the wrong debtor name and now I'm trying to figure out if our security interest is still valid. The whole UCC system seems designed to create these gotcha moments. Has anyone successfully challenged a rejected continuation based on debtor name issues?
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
•You might be able to file a corrective amendment if the error was minor, but if it's a completely different legal entity name, that's trickier. What exactly was the name discrepancy?
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•Original UCC-1 had 'Mountain View Properties Inc.' but the continuation was filed as 'Mountain View Property Inc.' - dropped the 's' on Properties. Seems minor but Colorado rejected it.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
•That's actually a significant difference legally - Properties vs Property could be different entities entirely. You'll probably need to start over with the correct name.
0 coins
Julia Hall
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai for all my UCC document prep now. You can upload your Charter documents and UCC-1 to verify the debtor names match exactly before filing. It's caught several potential mismatches for me that would have resulted in rejections. The tool is pretty straightforward - just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•Never heard of that service. Is it specifically for UCC filings or more general document checking?
0 coins
Julia Hall
•It's designed for UCC document verification specifically. Really helpful for avoiding the kind of debtor name issues the OP is dealing with. I wish I'd known about it earlier - would have saved me a lot of headaches.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
This thread is making me nervous about my own filings. I have three UCC continuations coming up in the next six months and now I'm worried about debtor name consistency. Is there a way to verify what names are actually on file with Colorado before you submit continuation paperwork?
0 coins
Tony Brooks
•You can do a UCC search on the Colorado SOS website to see exactly how the debtor name appears on the original filing. Always double-check before filing continuations.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
•Good advice. I'd also recommend keeping copies of the original UCC-1 in your files so you don't have to rely on searching the database every time.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•Another option is using something like Certana.ai to verify document consistency before filing. I've been using it for UCC-3 to UCC-1 verification and it's been really helpful for catching discrepancies early.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
Colorado's UCC system has gotten much more strict about debtor names in recent years. I remember when you could get away with minor variations, but now they're very literal about exact matches. The good news is that once you figure out the correct name format, continuations are usually processed pretty quickly.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•How quickly are we talking? I've got a continuation deadline coming up and I'm cutting it close on timing.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•If you file electronically with the correct information, usually within 24-48 hours. But if there are any issues, it can take much longer to resolve.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
Just to add another perspective - you might want to consult with a Colorado attorney who specializes in secured transactions if the loan amount is substantial. The cost of legal advice is probably much less than the potential loss if your security interest lapses. Some of these UCC technicalities can have serious consequences.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•That's probably good advice. I think I'm going to try the continuation with the original name first, but having legal backup might be smart given what's at stake.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
•Definitely worth it for high-value loans. UCC mistakes can be very expensive to fix after the fact.
0 coins
Haley Bennett
Update request - please let us know how this turns out! I'm sure others will face similar issues and it would be helpful to know what approach actually works with Colorado's system.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•Will definitely update once I get this resolved. Thanks everyone for the advice - feeling much more confident about the approach now.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
•Yes, please follow up! These kinds of real-world examples are super valuable for the rest of us dealing with UCC filings.
0 coins