UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Fatima Al-Hashemi

UCC search North Dakota results showing conflicting debtor info - need verification help

Running into a major headache with a UCC search in North Dakota and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I'm working on a commercial loan package and the UCC search results are showing what looks like conflicting debtor information across multiple filings. The borrower's legal name appears slightly different on various UCC-1 forms (some show 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' while others show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma). The filing numbers all seem legitimate but I'm concerned about whether these are actually the same entity or different debtors. Has anyone dealt with similar name variations in North Dakota UCC searches? I need to verify these are all the same company before we can move forward with the loan approval. The stakes are pretty high here since we're talking about a $850K credit facility and I can't afford to miss existing liens or security interests. Any guidance on how to properly verify debtor identity consistency would be hugely appreciated.

Following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in Minnesota. Different state but same basic challenge with entity name consistency across multiple UCC filings.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

Minnesota has its own quirks with debtor names. Definitely worth checking their specific requirements and search procedures.

0 coins

Each state handles these things differently. What works in ND might not apply in MN, unfortunately.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Thanks for posting this - really helpful discussion. I'll definitely be more careful about debtor name verification going forward. Seems like there are good tools and procedures available if you know where to look.

0 coins

The key is being systematic about it. Don't just assume - verify everything through multiple sources.

0 coins

Exactly. A little extra diligence upfront can save massive headaches later in the process.

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

UCC 9-31 requirement causing filing delays - need advice on compliance timing

Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our equipment financing UCC-1 filings keep getting held up because of UCC 9-31 compliance issues. We're a mid-size agricultural lender and have been filing UCCs for years but suddenly the secretary of state is flagging our submissions saying we're not meeting the UCC 9-31 requirements for debtor authorization timing. The specific issue is that we're getting our debtor authorizations signed but apparently there's some timing window we're missing between when the debtor signs and when we can actually file. Has anyone else run into this? We've got about $2.3M in equipment loans that need to be perfected and we're sitting in limbo while trying to figure out what exactly UCC 9-31 requires for the authorization timing. Our usual process has been to get the signed security agreement and file the UCC-1 within a few days but now they're saying that's not sufficient. Any insights on what the actual UCC 9-31 compliance window looks like would be hugely appreciated.

Aidan Hudson

•

This is frustrating but fixable. The key is making sure your security agreement language specifically authorizes the UCC filing you want to make. A lot of older security agreement forms don't have explicit UCC authorization clauses.

0 coins

Good point about older forms. Ours might be from before the revised Article 9. Probably time to update our templates.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

Definitely. The 2001 revisions made authorization requirements more explicit. Worth having your forms reviewed by someone who knows the current rules.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

UPDATE: We figured out the issue! Our security agreements had authorization for UCC filings but only for the 'collateral described herein.' When we filed UCCs with broader descriptions, we exceeded the scope of authorization. We're revising our security agreement template to authorize broader UCC collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Exactly what happened to us. Now we use Certana.ai to double-check that our security agreements and UCC-1s are consistent before every filing. Prevents these authorization mismatches.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help. Going to implement some document checking process to avoid this in the future. The Certana.ai suggestion sounds like it could save us from more headaches.

0 coins

NebulaNova

UCC filing on accounts receivable - debtor name exact match requirements?

Running into issues with my UCC filing on accounts receivable and need some guidance. I'm securing a $180K credit line for a manufacturing client, and their A/R portfolio is the main collateral. The debtor's legal name on their corporate charter is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but they've been doing business under 'AMS Manufacturing' for years - that's what appears on most of their invoices and A/R aging reports. My question is about the UCC-1 filing - do I need to use the exact legal entity name from the secretary of state records, or can I reference the DBA name that appears on the actual receivables? I've heard conflicting advice about whether using the wrong version could make the filing ineffective for perfecting our security interest. The last thing I want is to have a lien that doesn't properly attach to the A/R because of a name mismatch. Also wondering about the collateral description - should I be super specific about 'accounts receivable arising from the sale of manufactured goods' or is 'all accounts receivable' sufficient? This is my first A/R-secured deal and I want to make sure I don't mess up the perfection.

Yara Nassar

•

Just ran into this exact issue with document verification. Started using Certana.ai after a colleague recommended it - you upload your charter and UCC documents and it immediately spots name mismatches. Saved me from filing a UCC-1 that would have been worthless due to a debtor name error. Super straightforward to use.

0 coins

That sounds like exactly what I need. Is it expensive to use?

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

The cost is really minimal compared to fixing a messed up filing later. It's more about the peace of mind knowing your documents are consistent before you file.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to stick with the exact legal name from the state records and use 'all accounts receivable' for the collateral description. Going to double-check everything before filing - can't afford to get this wrong on a deal this size.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

Smart approach. Taking the extra time upfront always pays off with UCC filings.

0 coins

Definitely recommend that document verification step someone mentioned earlier. Better safe than sorry with these name issues.

0 coins

TillyCombatwarrior

UCC 1-308 reservation of rights on continuation filing - does this void my lien?

I'm dealing with a continuation situation that's got me second-guessing everything. My UCC-1 was filed in 2020 for equipment financing on manufacturing machinery, and I need to file the continuation by March 2025. Here's where it gets complicated - the original debtor added 'UCC 1-308' notation on their loan documents claiming reservation of rights, and now I'm wondering if this affects how I handle the UCC-3 continuation filing. The equipment is worth about $180K and I can't afford to mess this up. Has anyone dealt with UCC 1-308 reservations on secured transactions? Does this impact the continuation process or create any issues with lien priority? I've been going in circles trying to figure out if I need special language on the UCC-3 or if the reservation affects my perfected security interest at all.

Romeo Quest

•

One more validation point - I used to work in a bank's loan operations department and we saw UCC 1-308 notations regularly. Never once did it affect our continuation filing procedures or create any issues with our security interests. It's just borrower paranoia that doesn't translate to UCC filing complications.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

Great insight from someone who dealt with this professionally. That's exactly the kind of real-world experience that puts these concerns in perspective.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

For what it's worth, I had a debtor challenge a continuation filing once claiming their UCC 1-308 notation invalidated our security interest. The judge basically laughed it out of court. The notation has no bearing on properly perfected UCC filings. Your continuation will be fine if you follow standard procedures.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

Did the judge explain why the notation was irrelevant?

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Judge said UCC 1-308 relates to contract interpretation, not perfection of security interests. Two completely different areas of law.

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

UCC assignment rejected due to incomplete assignee information

So I'm dealing with a UCC assignment nightmare right now and could really use some guidance. We're trying to assign our security interest in some manufacturing equipment from our company to a new lender, but the SOS portal keeps rejecting our UCC-3 assignment filing. The error message says "assignee information incomplete" but I've triple-checked everything - assignee name, address, even the original UCC-1 filing number. This is holding up a $750K refinancing deal and I'm starting to panic. The original UCC-1 was filed about 18 months ago under our old business name (we did a name change last year) but I used the current legal entity name as the assignor. Could this be causing the rejection? The collateral description matches exactly what's on the original filing. Has anyone run into similar issues with UCC assignments where the assignor name doesn't match the original secured party name exactly? I'm worried we might need to do an amendment first before the assignment but that would add another week to this process.

This whole thread is making me realize I should probably audit our UCC filings. We've done several name changes over the years and I'm not sure all our security interests reflect our current legal name. Better to catch these issues proactively than during a time-sensitive transaction.

0 coins

Smart thinking. A lot of companies don't realize their UCC filings might not match their current corporate structure until they need to do an assignment or continuation.

0 coins

I actually used Certana.ai for exactly this kind of audit - uploaded all our UCC filings and corporate documents to check for consistency issues. Found several name mismatches we didn't even know about.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Hope you get this resolved quickly! UCC assignments can be tricky but once you get the name issue sorted out it should go smoothly. The amendment-then-assignment approach is definitely the right way to handle it. Keep us posted on how it goes.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the advice. I'm filing the amendment first thing tomorrow morning and will update the thread once I get through the whole process. Really appreciate the help!

0 coins

Prev1...475476477478479...685Next