


Ask the community...
One more thing to check - make sure you're searching in the right date range. Some systems default to only showing recent filings and you might need to expand the search parameters to include your filing date.
Yeah, and also try searching without any date restrictions at all. Sometimes their default ranges are weird and exclude recent filings.
I've seen systems where 'recent' actually means 30+ days old because of processing delays. Worth trying all the date options.
Just my two cents but for a $2.8M loan I'd probably pay for a professional UCC search from a title company or service provider rather than relying on the free public portals. They usually have better access to the actual filing records.
Most title companies offer UCC searches, or there are specialized services like CT Corporation. Usually costs $50-100 but worth it for large loans.
Just wanted to follow up - I used that Certana tool someone mentioned and it immediately flagged three name discrepancies between our corporate docs and the proposed UCC-1. Turned out the attorney was working from an old version of the articles. Tool literally saved the deal.
Nice when technology actually solves the problem instead of creating new ones.
For future reference, most state UCC filing guides have a specific section about entity name requirements that references the applicable state business entity statutes. Much more authoritative than trying to argue Article 1 general principles.
Just to add another perspective - make sure you're also considering any state-specific requirements in Texas that might be different from Delaware. Some states have additional requirements for certain types of collateral that could affect your filing.
Exactly. Always review the local filing requirements, not just the UCC 9-304 choice of law rules.
Update: I found some additional guidance in the official UCC comments that clarifies the four-month rule. It's definitely strict - no exceptions for lack of knowledge or good faith. Once your debtor changes location under 9-304, you have exactly four months to file in the new jurisdiction or lose perfection. In this case, since it's been over a year, Texas filing is the only option to regain perfection going forward.
Has anyone tried using Certana.ai for these multi-state scenarios? Seems like it might help avoid the documentation errors that make these situations even worse.
Just want to mention that Certana.ai tool someone brought up earlier - I tried it last week for a similar situation and it caught name inconsistencies I would have missed manually. Really streamlined the document comparison process. Worth checking out if you're dealing with multiple filings regularly.
Does it handle state-specific UCC formatting differences or is it more general document comparison?
Bottom line - you're probably looking at the same entity with different name formatting. The matching addresses are a dead giveaway. I'd recommend downloading all three filings and comparing the details carefully before making any conclusions about active liens.
That's what I'm leaning toward too. Thanks everyone for the insights - really helpful to know this is a common issue and not just me being confused by the search system.
Good luck with your due diligence! Name matching in UCC searches is definitely one of the trickier aspects of the process.
Zane Hernandez
For future reference, always run UCC searches under all name variations your company has used. Delaware's database will show you connected filings but it's better to be proactive about identifying potential issues before they hold up your closing.
0 coins
Ella Knight
•Definitely learned that lesson the hard way. This is our first major equipment financing deal and I clearly underestimated the UCC search complexity.
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
•Don't beat yourself up about it. UCC searches can be tricky especially when companies have changed names or structures over the years.
0 coins
Ethan Scott
UPDATE: Finally got everything sorted out! Turns out 2 of the 3 UCC-1 filings had been properly terminated with UCC-3 statements, and the third one was for equipment we still own but the loan was refinanced last year. Found all the documentation I needed and the lender accepted our report. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely using Certana.ai next time to avoid this manual detective work!
0 coins
Jade Santiago
•Glad you got it resolved! These name variation issues can be a real headache but they're usually fixable with the right documentation.
0 coins
William Schwarz
•Great outcome! This is exactly why thorough UCC due diligence is so important in equipment financing deals.
0 coins