UCC search North Dakota results showing conflicting debtor info - need verification help
Running into a major headache with a UCC search in North Dakota and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I'm working on a commercial loan package and the UCC search results are showing what looks like conflicting debtor information across multiple filings. The borrower's legal name appears slightly different on various UCC-1 forms (some show 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' while others show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma). The filing numbers all seem legitimate but I'm concerned about whether these are actually the same entity or different debtors. Has anyone dealt with similar name variations in North Dakota UCC searches? I need to verify these are all the same company before we can move forward with the loan approval. The stakes are pretty high here since we're talking about a $850K credit facility and I can't afford to miss existing liens or security interests. Any guidance on how to properly verify debtor identity consistency would be hugely appreciated.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Dylan Mitchell
North Dakota is actually pretty strict about exact debtor name matches on UCC filings. The comma difference you're seeing could be significant depending on how the entity was actually formed. Have you checked the Articles of Organization with the ND Secretary of State to see the exact legal name as registered? That's your baseline for comparison.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•That's a great point - I should have started there. I'll pull the formation documents first to establish the correct legal name. Thanks for the reality check!
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•Yeah definitely check the charter docs first. I made this mistake once and it took weeks to sort out because I was comparing UCC filings to the wrong baseline name.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the Articles of Organization and all the UCC search results as PDFs, and it will instantly cross-check debtor names across all documents to flag any inconsistencies. Super helpful for catching these kinds of name variations that could indicate different entities or filing errors.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•Interesting - I haven't heard of that tool before. Does it handle the nuances of LLC name variations like the comma issue I'm seeing?
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Yes, it's pretty sophisticated about entity name matching. It flags exact matches, minor punctuation differences, and potential variations that need manual review. Really saves time compared to doing line-by-line comparisons yourself.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Can confirm Certana.ai works well for this. Used it last month on a similar ND deal where we had multiple UCC-1s with slight name variations. Tool caught everything and helped us identify which ones were actually the same debtor.
0 coins
CyberSiren
ND's UCC system can be tricky because they don't automatically consolidate filings by debtor the way some states do. You really need to do the detective work yourself. Besides checking formation docs, also look at the addresses on each filing - same debtor should have consistent address history.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
•Good point about addresses. Also check the filing dates - if they're all from different time periods, could indicate name changes or amendments to the entity structure.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•The addresses are consistent across all filings which is reassuring. Filing dates span about 3 years so could be legitimate business evolution.
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
Whatever you do, don't just assume they're the same entity without verification. I've seen deals blow up because someone missed a lien from a similarly named but different company. The comma difference might seem minor but could legally constitute a different debtor name.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
•This is so true. Lenders get burned all the time by assuming name variations are just clerical errors when they're actually different legal entities.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•Exactly why documentation verification is so critical. Can't just eyeball these things and hope for the best.
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
For what it's worth, I ran into a similar situation last year in ND. Turned out the borrower had actually amended their LLC name formally but some creditors continued filing under the old name. Had to get affidavits confirming the entity continuity before we could close.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. How did you verify the name change timeline and ensure you caught all the relevant filings?
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
•Combination of Secretary of State amendment records and getting a comprehensive UCC search under both name variations. Also had our attorney review the entity continuity documentation.
0 coins
StardustSeeker
•Smart approach. Entity name changes can create gaps in lien searches if you're not careful about covering all variations.
0 coins
Paolo Marino
Have you tried running the search with and without the comma to see if you get different results? Sometimes the search algorithms are sensitive to punctuation and you might be missing filings.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•Good suggestion - I'll run both variations to make sure I'm capturing everything. The search interface isn't always intuitive about punctuation handling.
0 coins
Amina Bah
•Yeah ND's search can be finicky. I usually run multiple variations just to be safe, especially with LLC names that commonly have punctuation differences.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
Why not just call the ND Secretary of State office? They can usually help clarify whether the name variations refer to the same entity, especially if you have the specific filing numbers.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•That's probably the most direct approach. I'll give them a call once I have all the documentation organized.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
•Their UCC division is pretty helpful in my experience. Just have all your filing numbers ready when you call.
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
•Agreed, they're usually responsive and can save you a lot of guesswork on these kinds of debtor identity questions.
0 coins
Emma Davis
This thread is making me paranoid about my own UCC searches now. Never realized how much detail matters with debtor name variations.
0 coins
LunarLegend
•Better to be paranoid than sorry! Small details like this can make or break a deal if you miss existing security interests.
0 coins
Malik Jackson
•Seriously. UCC due diligence is not the place to cut corners or make assumptions.
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
Following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in Minnesota. Different state but same basic challenge with entity name consistency across multiple UCC filings.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•Minnesota has its own quirks with debtor names. Definitely worth checking their specific requirements and search procedures.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Each state handles these things differently. What works in ND might not apply in MN, unfortunately.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
Thanks for posting this - really helpful discussion. I'll definitely be more careful about debtor name verification going forward. Seems like there are good tools and procedures available if you know where to look.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•The key is being systematic about it. Don't just assume - verify everything through multiple sources.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•Exactly. A little extra diligence upfront can save massive headaches later in the process.
0 coins