< Back to UCC Document Community

Giovanni Colombo

DCF security agreement form - need help with UCC-1 filing requirements

I'm working on a commercial lending deal and the borrower provided their DCF security agreement form as collateral documentation. The form references specific equipment and inventory but I'm not sure how to properly translate this into the UCC-1 collateral description. The security agreement mentions detailed serial numbers and model information but I've heard conflicting advice about whether to include all those specifics in the UCC filing or keep it more general. This is for a $180k equipment financing deal and I really can't afford to mess up the perfection. The DCF form seems pretty standard but I want to make sure I'm not missing any requirements when I file the UCC-1. Anyone dealt with DCF security agreement forms before and know the best practice for collateral descriptions?

I've worked with DCF security agreement forms quite a bit. The key thing to remember is that your UCC-1 collateral description doesn't have to match the security agreement word-for-word. You want to be specific enough to put third parties on notice but not so detailed that you risk errors. For equipment financing, I usually go with something like 'all equipment described in security agreement dated [date]' plus a general description of the equipment type.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is solid advice. I learned the hard way that being too specific can backfire if there's a typo in a serial number.

0 coins

But doesn't that create issues if the security agreement gets amended later? I always thought you needed to be more specific.

0 coins

You can reference the security agreement by date, that way amendments don't automatically affect the UCC filing unless you need to amend the UCC too.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Been there with DCF forms! The serial number thing is tricky - I usually include the main equipment categories but reference the security agreement for specifics. Like 'manufacturing equipment including but not limited to items described in Security Agreement dated MM/DD/YYYY.' Covers your bases without getting into serial number hell.

0 coins

YES this approach saved me so much headache. Serial numbers are a nightmare to get right and one mistake can mess up your perfection.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

What about inventory though? That's always changing so you can't really list specifics anyway.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

For inventory I just go with 'all inventory now owned or hereafter acquired' - keeps it broad enough to capture everything.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

I actually had a filing rejected because I tried to copy the exact serial numbers from a DCF security agreement form and made a transcription error. The SOS system flagged it and I had to refile. Now I use a document verification tool - I upload both the security agreement and my draft UCC-1 to Certana.ai and it catches those kinds of inconsistencies before I submit. Saved me from several potential mistakes since then.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

How does that work exactly? Do you have to pay for each document check?

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

It's pretty straightforward - you just upload your PDF files and it cross-checks the debtor names, collateral descriptions, and other key details. Really helps catch those small errors that can cause big problems.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

That sounds useful. I've been manually comparing documents but it's easy to miss things when you're rushing through multiple deals.

0 coins

Wait, I'm confused about something. When you say DCF security agreement form, are you talking about a specific state form or just the general term? Because I've seen different requirements depending on which state you're filing in.

0 coins

It's just the standard security agreement form they use for this type of collateral. The UCC filing requirements should be the same regardless of the specific form format.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Yeah the UCC rules are pretty consistent across states for this stuff. The security agreement format doesn't really matter as much as getting the UCC-1 right.

0 coins

I always stress about the collateral description too. One thing that helped me was creating a standard template for equipment deals. Something like: 'All equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor, including without limitation all equipment described in Security Agreement dated [DATE] between [PARTIES].' Broad enough to cover everything but specific enough to reference your security agreement.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

That's a good template. Do you ever run into issues with it being too broad?

0 coins

Not really. The security agreement is what actually defines the specific collateral, the UCC-1 just needs to give reasonable notice to third parties.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

This is exactly what I needed to see. I've been overthinking the collateral description requirements.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

UGH the collateral description is the worst part of UCC filings. I spend more time on that section than anything else because I'm terrified of messing it up. For a $180k deal you definitely want to get it right. Have you considered having someone else review it before filing?

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

I always have a colleague double-check my UCC filings. Fresh eyes catch things you miss.

0 coins

Same here. I've caught so many errors in other people's filings and they've caught mine. Worth the extra step.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

For equipment financing deals like yours, I usually keep the UCC-1 collateral description somewhat general but cross-reference the security agreement. The courts have generally been okay with this approach as long as it's clear what you're claiming a security interest in. Just make sure your debtor name is exactly right - that's where most filings go wrong.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

This is so true. I've seen more problems with debtor names than collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Good point about the debtor name. I always triple-check that against the articles of incorporation or other organizational documents.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Exactly. And make sure you're using the exact legal name, not any DBA or trade names.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

I had a similar situation last month with a DCF security agreement. What I ended up doing was using a hybrid approach - I included the main categories of equipment but also referenced the security agreement for the detailed specifications. Filed without any issues and the lender was happy with the approach.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

That sounds like a good compromise. Gets you the specificity without all the risk of transcription errors.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

This is where that document verification tool I mentioned earlier really helps. You can upload both documents and it flags any inconsistencies between your security agreement and UCC-1 before you submit.

0 coins

One thing to watch out for with DCF security agreement forms is that they sometimes include after-acquired property clauses. Make sure your UCC-1 collateral description covers that if it's relevant to your deal. Something like 'all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired' language.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Good catch. After-acquired property is easy to forget but really important for ongoing business relationships.

0 coins

Yes, this deal does involve some future equipment purchases so I'll make sure to include that language.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I've found that being too generic in the collateral description can sometimes cause problems down the road if there are disputes about what's actually covered. You want to be broad enough to avoid errors but specific enough that it's clear what you're claiming. It's a delicate balance.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

That's a fair point. I guess it depends on the specific situation and what kind of collateral you're dealing with.

0 coins

I think referencing the security agreement by date strikes the right balance. It's specific enough to identify the collateral but doesn't require you to repeat all the details in the UCC filing.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today