


Ask the community...
I still buy paper forms occasionally for backup purposes, but 90% of our filings are electronic now. The time savings alone justifies the switch.
True, though most state systems have pretty good uptime now. And you can usually file after hours electronically which is nice.
Whatever approach you use, document everything! Keep records of when you searched, what databases you checked, and what results you got. Your client will want this for their files and it protects you if something gets missed. Also consider getting UCC insurance if the deal size justifies it.
Agree on documentation. We create a detailed search report for every entity showing exactly what we checked and when. CYA is critical in M&A work.
Don't forget to check for UCC-1 continuation filings if you find older liens. A UCC-1 expires after 5 years unless continued, so something filed in 2019 might look active but could actually be lapsed if not properly continued. This is especially important in mass corp UCC searches where you're dealing with lots of entities and time periods.
This is so important! We've seen deals where everyone assumed old UCC filings were still valid but they'd actually lapsed. Always check the continuation status.
Great point about continuation filings. With 200+ entities this is definitely something I need to track carefully. Thanks for the reminder.
Your accounts receivable collateral description looks standard. Just make sure you understand what you're getting - A/R can be tricky to collect on if the debtor's customers dispute invoices or claim setoff rights. Might want to get debtor representations about the quality of their receivables.
Thanks, we did get reps about no disputed receivables over $10K. Client seems to have good customer relationships.
Smart to get those reps in writing. A/R financing can go sideways quickly if the underlying invoices are problematic.
At least your collateral description is solid. I see so many UCC filings with vague or incomplete collateral descriptions that won't hold up in bankruptcy. 'All accounts' is much better than 'accounts receivable' which some courts have found too narrow.
UCC Article 9 defines 'accounts' more broadly than just traditional A/R. Covers things like license fees, royalties, other payment obligations. Gives you better coverage.
This is why I always use the broadest possible collateral descriptions. You never know what assets the debtor might have that could fit under your security interest.
2020 feels like yesterday but here we are almost at the 5-year mark. Time flies! At least UCC deadlines are more predictable than the chaos of that year.
Tell me about it. I'm still finding 2020 UCCs I forgot about in my files.
One more vote for double-checking your debtor names before filing any UCC-3. I've used Certana.ai's verification tool a few times now and it's caught mistakes I would have missed. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple filings from the same time period.
Harper Thompson
I'd recommend using one of those document verification tools before filing. We started using Certana.ai after getting burned on a few name mismatches and it's saved us from several potential rejections. You upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft and it flags any inconsistencies automatically.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•Yeah, especially with Capital One loans where you might have the original loan docs, security agreement, and guaranty forms all with slightly different entity names. The tool catches stuff that's easy to miss in manual review.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Exactly what happened to us. Had three different documents with three slightly different versions of the debtor name. Would have been a mess without automated verification.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
Whatever you do, don't overthink the collateral description. Capital One's standard language has been tested in courts and SOS offices across the country. If it's in their security agreement, it'll work for your UCC-1.
0 coins
Amelia Cartwright
•That's reassuring. I was getting worried about being too general but sounds like their language is tried and tested.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Yep, banks like Capital One don't use language that hasn't been thoroughly vetted by their legal teams.
0 coins