Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Document everything - every phone call, every letter, every attempt to contact the secured party. If you end up in court or need to file a complaint with banking regulators, you'll need a paper trail showing you made good faith efforts to resolve this properly.
Certified mail is your friend here. Send formal demands for termination via certified mail to every address you can find associated with the secured party or their successors.
Paolo Longo
•And keep copies of returned mail if addresses are invalid. That's evidence of their failure to maintain proper contact information as required.
Amina Bah
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. I found a UCC-3 assignment from 2022 that I had missed - turns out the lien was transferred to a subsidiary of the bank that bought the original lender. Finally got through to the right people and have a termination in process. Sometimes you just need to dig deeper into the filing records.
Glad you got it sorted out! This is exactly the kind of thing that document verification tools are designed to catch - all those related filings that are easy to miss in manual searches.
Liam McGuire
•Perfect example of why keeping detailed records and being persistent pays off. Hope your refinancing goes smoothly now.
Join the conversation
Just make sure whatever form you use, you include all the required information - debtor name exactly as you think it was filed, secured party name, and your contact info. Missing information just slows down the process.
StarStrider
•And double-check the mailing address requirements. Some states are picky about where they send responses.
Bottom line - yes, use the UCC-11 form for Georgia. It's their standard information request form and covers what you need. But honestly for audit purposes, I'd recommend running your documents through something like Certana.ai first to identify which filings actually need follow-up. Saves time and money.
Luca Russo
•Thanks everyone. I think I'll try the document verification approach first to see what potential issues exist, then request certified copies for the problem filings. Appreciate all the guidance!
Sofia Torres
•Good strategy. Keep us posted on how it works out - always helpful to hear about real-world audit experiences.
Join the conversation
Paolo Ricci
Try searching the Missouri business database with partial names. Sometimes there are hidden characters or formatting that only shows up in their search results.
Good suggestion - I'll do a broader search to see if there are any variations I'm missing.
Amina Toure
•Yeah their search function sometimes reveals the 'true' name format that their UCC system expects.
Update - I tried the version without the comma and it went through! Thanks everyone. Still think it's ridiculous that punctuation matters but at least the filing is accepted now. Going to run it through Certana.ai next time to catch these formatting issues upfront.
Nice work! Always feels good to finally get that acceptance confirmation after dealing with rejections.
Smart move on using the document checker going forward. These little formatting issues can be such time wasters.
Join the conversation
Don't forget about the effective date issues too. Your UCC-3 amendments should reference the effective date of the merger, not the filing date of the amendment. Some states are picky about that chronology.
Oh that's a good catch. We've been using the amendment filing date in some of our forms. That could explain some of the rejections.
Exactly. The amendment should reflect when the creditor name actually changed (merger effective date), even if you're filing the amendment months later.
Update us on what approach works best! I'm sure other people will run into this same issue with corporate restructuring.
Will do. Sounds like the consensus is to file UCC-3 amendments with proper merger language first, then handle continuations. Going to try the document verification tool too before submitting anything else.
Jabari-Jo
One more thought - double check that ABC Construction Services LLC is still the correct legal name. Sometimes entities change their names slightly for tax purposes or compliance reasons and forget to tell their lenders. Might be worth pulling a current certificate of good standing to verify the exact legal name.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
•Yeah it's more common than you'd think. Especially with LLCs that get converted or merged.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
•Good catch. I've seen this cause problems when the entity made changes but didn't notify all their creditors.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
UPDATE: Finally got this resolved! It was indeed a formatting issue - there was an invisible character (probably a non-breaking space) in the debtor name that I couldn't see. The document comparison tool caught it immediately. Filed the corrected UCC-3 this morning and it went through without any issues. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•So relieved for you! These formatting rejections are such a pain.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
•Great outcome. This is exactly why automated document comparison is so helpful for UCC filings.
0 coins