UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents before filing. It caught several issues with our collateral clause language that would have definitely caused rejections. Really streamlined our process.

0 coins

How detailed does it get with the feedback? Does it suggest specific language changes?

0 coins

It flags potential issues and common rejection patterns. Really helpful for catching vague or insufficient descriptions before you submit.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This might be obvious but make sure you're not using any prohibited language. Some states have specific words or phrases they don't allow in collateral descriptions. Check your state's UCC guide if they have one.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

We keep a state-by-state checklist for this stuff. Saves a lot of headaches when you're filing in multiple jurisdictions.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. Going to revise our standard clause language to be more specific and maybe try that Certana tool to double-check before our next batch of filings.

0 coins

Update us when you figure out the exact reason for rejection! These kinds of posts help everyone learn what to watch out for. NY SOS rejections are so frustrating because their rejection notices are usually vague.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

Will do. Going to check for entity name changes first, then use that verification tool someone mentioned to compare the documents character by character.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Looking forward to hearing what it was. These name mismatch rejections are becoming way too common.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Just a thought - if this is urgent and you're worried about the lapse deadline, you might want to have your attorney refile it while you're troubleshooting. Better to have a duplicate filing fee than risk losing perfection on a $2.8M loan.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

You're right. I'm going to start the corrected refiling process today rather than wait to figure out every detail of what went wrong.

0 coins

Jamal Edwards

•

Definitely the safe approach. You can always amend or terminate the duplicate later if needed.

0 coins

Whatever you do, make sure all your debtor names are EXACTLY the same across all states. Even small variations can cause problems. I learned this the hard way when one state had 'Inc.' and another had 'Incorporated' - total mess to clean up.

0 coins

This is where document verification tools like Certana.ai really shine. Manual checking is error-prone but automated cross-checking catches these name variations instantly.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

Debtor name consistency is huge. Get the exact legal name from the charter and use it identically on every filing.

0 coins

Final thought - consider whether you need to file UCC-1 addendums in any states. Some require additional pages if your collateral description is long or if you have multiple debtors/secured parties.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

Texas definitely requires addendums for longer collateral descriptions. Their form has limited space.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Most online filing systems will tell you if you need an addendum when you're entering the information.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Just wanted to add that timing is really important with fixture filings. If you're going to file as fixtures, you need to do it quickly after the equipment is installed to maximize your priority position. Waiting too long can affect your rights against other creditors. Also, make sure you have a good description of the real estate in your fixture filing. It needs to be sufficient to identify the property, which usually means the legal description from the deed or mortgage.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Six months might be cutting it close depending on your state's rules. Some states have shorter timeframes for purchase money security interests in fixtures. Definitely worth checking the specific statute.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

The real estate description is another area where people mess up fixture filings. It has to be precise enough to identify the property in the real estate records.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

Update: We ended up going with fixture filings for the integrated equipment after consulting with local counsel. The ventilation system and built-in ovens clearly met the fixture test, and the custom refrigeration units were borderline but we included them to be safe. Used Certana.ai to verify all our documents were consistent before filing - caught a small discrepancy in the debtor name between the loan agreement and our initial UCC-1 draft that could have caused problems. The verification process was really straightforward, just uploaded our PDFs and got instant feedback on any issues. Filing went smoothly and the loan closed on schedule. Thanks to everyone who provided input on the fixture determination - it really helped clarify our thinking on this complex issue.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Glad to hear Certana.ai helped catch that debtor name issue. Those kinds of discrepancies are so easy to miss but can cause major problems later.

0 coins

Thanks for the update! It's always helpful to hear how these situations resolve. Fixture filings are definitely one of the more complex areas of UCC practice.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Whatever you do, don't keep guessing and filing. Each rejection creates a record and some lenders get nervous when they see multiple failed attempts. Better to verify the exact name first.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

Good point. I don't want to make this look worse than it already is.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Right, and some states charge a fee for each filing attempt whether it's accepted or rejected.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Just went through something similar and the Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier really is a lifesaver. I was comparing documents manually and missing subtle differences that the automated check caught immediately. Definitely worth trying if you're stuck.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

It's especially good for catching those tiny punctuation and spacing differences that are impossible to spot by eye when you're stressed.

0 coins

Agreed, the automated verification takes the guesswork out of it completely.

0 coins

Prev1...441442443444445...684Next