Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I've started double-checking everything with document comparison tools after getting burned on a name mismatch. Found this Certana.ai service that lets you upload your charter docs and UCC drafts together - it automatically spots inconsistencies in debtor names and other details. Wish I'd known about it earlier.
That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it handle LLC name variations well?
Yes, it's pretty smart about entity name formats. Flags things like missing punctuation or abbreviation differences between documents.
Just went through this same thing last week. The key is patience and accuracy. Don't rush the filing just to meet a deadline if you're not 100% sure about the debtor name. A delayed filing is better than a worthless one.
Explain to the lender that accuracy is more important than speed. They'll understand when you frame it as protecting their security interest.
Absolutely right. Lenders would rather wait a few extra days than have an unperfected security interest.
Join the conversation
Update: Finally got it figured out! The issue was the apostrophe in the company name - had to remove it completely for Delaware's system to accept the filing. Thanks everyone for the help, especially whoever mentioned the document checker tool.
This thread should be pinned - Delaware name formatting issues come up constantly. The apostrophe thing has burned so many people on continuations.
Agreed! Maybe we should start a Delaware-specific UCC filing tips thread.
Every state has their own quirks but Delaware seems especially picky about entity name formatting lately.
Join the conversation
I just want to mention that while everyone's focused on minimizing fees, there's real value in using tools that help ensure filing accuracy. I started using Certana.ai to cross-check my UCC documents before filing, and it's caught several potential name mismatches that would have resulted in rejections. The small investment in verification tools pays for itself by avoiding rejection fees and refiling costs.
How does that verification process work exactly? Do you upload the documents and it automatically checks for issues?
Yes, you just upload PDFs of your Charter documents and UCC forms, and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names or other potential issues. Much faster than manual cross-checking.
After reading all these responses, it sounds like the Wisconsin UCC filing fees are just a cost of doing business that needs to be planned for properly. The real savings come from avoiding unnecessary amendments and rejections through careful initial filings. Thanks everyone for the practical advice - this has been really helpful for structuring my future deals.
Glad this discussion was useful! The Wisconsin UCC system is pretty straightforward once you develop good practices around it.
Definitely agree that planning and accuracy are more important than trying to avoid the fees altogether.
Join the conversation
Been lurking on this thread because I'm in equipment finance too. This whole discussion is making me want to review all our UCC-1 templates. Sounds like a lot of us are making the same mistakes with overly specific collateral descriptions.
Same here. Found several filings where our collateral descriptions were so specific they probably wouldn't survive a challenge.
We actually used Certana.ai to audit our existing UCC filings against our loan documents. Found way more discrepancies than we expected. Really opened our eyes.
Update for everyone following this - I filed the UCC-3 amendment yesterday with corrected collateral descriptions based on the actual equipment delivered. Also got written confirmation from our debtor acknowledging the non-conforming goods. Feels like we're in much better shape now. Thanks for all the advice, especially about not waiting. This community is awesome for practical guidance on real-world UCC issues.
Smart move on getting the written acknowledgment from the debtor. That could be crucial if issues come up later.
Thanks for the update. These follow-ups are really helpful for learning how these situations actually play out.
Henrietta Beasley
Been through this exact scenario multiple times. First, pull your LLC's Certificate of Formation or Articles directly from the state website - use that EXACT name format on your UCC-1. Second, for manufacturing equipment, try this collateral description: 'All machinery, equipment, tools, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor, wherever located, together with all additions, attachments, accessions, replacements, and substitutions thereto.' That's broad enough to cover everything but specific enough to satisfy most SOS requirements.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•That's solid boilerplate language. I use similar wording for equipment financing and rarely get rejections.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•Save that description template - works for most equipment deals unless you need something super specific.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
One more thing to check - make sure your UCC-1 doesn't have any auto-populated fields that might be wrong. Some filing software carries over information from previous filings and you might not notice small errors. Also verify the filing fee is correct - some states have different fees for equipment vs inventory filings. A wrong fee can cause rejections even if everything else is perfect.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Good catch on the fees. I've seen filings rejected for being $5 short on the filing fee.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•Auto-population errors are sneaky. Always review every field even if it looks right at first glance.
0 coins