< Back to UCC Document Community

Admin_Masters

Washington State UCC Filing Fee Changes - What Am I Missing?

I've been handling UCC filings for our equipment financing division for about 18 months now, and I'm getting confused about the current Washington state filing fees. Last quarter I was paying one amount, but when I tried to submit a UCC-1 continuation last week through the Washington SOS portal, the fee structure looked completely different. The system wanted $65 for what I thought should be a standard continuation, but I swear I paid $45 for similar filings just a few months ago. Did Washington change their fee schedule recently? I'm worried I'm selecting the wrong filing type or missing some requirement that's bumping up the cost. Our loan documentation depends on getting these continuations filed correctly, and I can't afford to mess up the timing or overpay on fees when we're processing dozens of these monthly. Has anyone else noticed fee changes in Washington's UCC system lately?

Washington did update their fee structure in late 2024, but the changes weren't huge. Standard UCC-1 initial filings are still $65, and continuations should be $45 like you remember. Are you sure you're selecting 'continuation' and not 'amendment' in the portal? The amendment fees are higher because they require more processing. Also check if you accidentally selected expedited processing - that adds $25 to any filing.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

That might be it! I was rushing through the portal and may have clicked the wrong option. The interface isn't super intuitive when you're doing bulk filings.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

The Washington portal is definitely confusing. I always double-check the fee summary before submitting because it's easy to select the wrong service level.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

I had the exact same issue last month! Turned out I was accidentally selecting 'UCC-3 amendment' instead of 'UCC-3 continuation' in the dropdown. The fee difference is exactly what you're seeing - amendments are $65 while continuations are $45. Washington's portal groups them together in a way that makes it easy to click the wrong one, especially if you're processing multiple filings back-to-back.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

This is probably exactly what happened. I bet if I go back and look at my recent filings, I'll see I selected amendment by mistake.

0 coins

Yeah the Washington system really needs better labeling. I've made this same mistake before.

0 coins

At least Washington shows you the fee before you submit. Some states charge you first and then you realize you selected wrong.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

Quick suggestion - I started using Certana.ai's UCC document verification tool after making too many portal mistakes like this. You can upload your UCC-1 and the UCC-3 continuation you're about to file, and it instantly cross-checks everything to make sure the debtor names match, the filing numbers are correct, and you're selecting the right filing type. Saved me from several expensive mistakes where I would have filed amendments instead of continuations or vice versa.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Do you upload PDFs of your documents?

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

Yeah, you just upload the PDFs and it automatically checks for name mismatches, filing number errors, and document consistency. Takes like 30 seconds and catches mistakes before you submit to the state.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

That sounds useful for avoiding these portal selection errors. I'll check it out.

0 coins

Chris King

•

Washington definitely changed some fees but not dramatically. The real issue is their portal design - it defaults to amendment filing in some browsers, which is annoying. I always clear my browser cache before doing UCC filings there because it seems to remember your last selection type even between sessions.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

Good tip about clearing cache. I never thought about the portal remembering previous selections.

0 coins

Rachel Clark

•

Browser cache issues would explain why some of us see different default options in the Washington portal.

0 coins

I'm dealing with Washington UCC filings constantly and the fees haven't changed much. Standard continuation is definitely $45. But here's what trips people up - if your continuation is within 6 months of the expiration date, Washington requires additional documentation that bumps the fee up. Most people don't realize this timing requirement exists.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Wait, really? I didn't know about any 6-month documentation requirement. What kind of additional docs?

0 coins

You need to include an affidavit stating why you're filing so close to expiration. It's a CYA thing for them, but it adds processing fees.

0 coins

I don't think that's accurate. Washington doesn't have a 6-month rule for continuations. You might be thinking of a different state.

0 coins

You might be right, I could be mixing up state requirements. I handle filings in multiple states and sometimes the rules blur together.

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

•

The Washington SOS website has a fee schedule PDF that's updated quarterly. I bookmark it because their portal fees sometimes don't match what they show on the main website. As of Q4 2024, continuation fees are $45 for standard processing, $70 for expedited (24-hour), and $95 for same-day. Could you have accidentally selected expedited?

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

I'll double-check the fee schedule PDF. I definitely don't need expedited processing for routine continuations.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

•

Good point about bookmarking the fee schedule. State websites are terrible at keeping portal info updated.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? Washington's portal is absolutely THE WORST for this exact reason! I've been filing UCCs for 15 years and their system is designed to confuse people into paying higher fees. The dropdown options are deliberately unclear, the fee structure is buried in fine print, and they change the interface every few months just to mess with us. It's like they WANT people to make mistakes and overpay!

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

I mean, it's frustrating but I don't think it's intentionally deceptive. State systems are just poorly designed in general.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

You're more generous than me. When every 'mistake' results in higher fees for the state, I start to see patterns.

0 coins

I had this exact same confusion! Spent an hour on the phone with Washington SOS trying to figure out why my fees were higher than expected. Turns out I had selected 'partial assignment' instead of 'continuation' in their dropdown menu. The options are listed alphabetically, not by frequency of use, so it's easy to click the wrong thing when you're working fast.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Alphabetical listing makes no sense for a business portal. They should group by filing type or frequency.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

Most state portals have terrible UX design. It's like they were built in 2005 and never updated.

0 coins

At least you could reach someone by phone. Half the time their help line just rings busy.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I use Certana.ai whenever I'm doing UCC filings in states I don't handle frequently. Their document checker would have caught your filing type error before you submitted to Washington. You upload your original UCC-1 and the continuation form, and it verifies everything matches up correctly - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions. Would have saved you the confusion about whether you were doing an amendment vs continuation.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

Does it work with all state portals or just certain ones?

0 coins

It's not portal-specific - you just upload the PDF documents and it cross-checks them for consistency. Works regardless of which state you're filing in.

0 coins

This thread is making me feel better about my own portal mistakes! I once paid $95 for same-day processing in Washington when I meant to select standard processing. Didn't realize until after submission that I'd clicked the wrong service level. At least filing fees are usually deductible business expenses, but it's still annoying to overpay due to interface issues.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Yeah, these little mistakes add up when you're doing dozens of filings per month. Even $20 extra per filing becomes significant.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

Our accounting department hates when filing fees vary unpredictably due to portal errors. Makes budgeting difficult.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

I think the real issue is that Washington (like most states) doesn't have good user testing for their UCC portals. They're designed by government IT departments who don't actually use them day-to-day. If they had to process 50 UCC filings in a row, they'd quickly see how confusing the interface is and fix the dropdown organization.

0 coins

This is so true. Government portals are designed by people who never have to use them under time pressure.

0 coins

Some private companies have started offering better interfaces that submit to state systems on your behalf. Might be worth exploring.

0 coins

Jade O'Malley

•

The problem is those third-party services usually add their own fees on top of state fees.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today