< Back to UCC Document Community

Yara Campbell

secretary of state ucc filing fees - why do they vary so much between amendments?

I'm dealing with a client who has UCC filings across multiple states and the secretary of state ucc filing fees are driving me crazy. Just processed a UCC-3 amendment in one state for $15, but the same type of filing in another state was $45. The debtor has equipment collateral in 4 different states and we need to file continuation statements before the 5-year mark hits next month. Has anyone else noticed how inconsistent these secretary of state ucc filing fees are? I'm trying to budget for the client but every state seems to have different fee structures. Some charge per debtor name, others have flat rates, and I even found one that charges extra for electronic vs paper filing. Is there a resource that lists current secretary of state ucc filing fees by state? The SOS websites are not always updated and I don't want to get hit with surprise costs when we batch these continuations.

Isaac Wright

•

Oh man, you're not kidding about the fee variations! I handle secured transactions for a regional bank and secretary of state ucc filing fees have been a nightmare to track. Last year I budgeted $25 per continuation and got burned when three states had increased their fees mid-year. Now I keep a spreadsheet but it's constant maintenance. The worst part is when you submit a filing and it gets rejected for insufficient fees - then you're paying twice and dealing with timing issues.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

The rejection for insufficient fees is the absolute worst. Had that happen on a continuation that was due within days of the deadline. Pure panic mode.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

Which states hit you with the fee increases? I need to update my own tracking sheet.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

The fee structure differences make no sense from a policy standpoint. Why should a UCC-1 initial filing cost $40 in one state and $12 in another? It's the same basic function. And don't get me started on the states that charge per additional debtor vs flat rate. Secretary of state ucc filing fees should be standardized somehow but I guess that's never happening.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

It's all about state revenue generation. Some states subsidize their filing systems, others treat it as a profit center.

0 coins

The per-debtor charging is especially frustrating when you have complex corporate structures with multiple entities.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

At least most states have moved to electronic filing. Remember when you had to mail paper forms with checks? Those were dark times.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

I actually solved this exact problem last month using Certana.ai's document verification tool. When I upload our UCC forms, it shows the current filing fees for each state right in the verification report. Saves me from having to check multiple SOS websites and the fee information stays current. Plus it catches any document inconsistencies before I submit - which has saved me from rejection fees more than once.

0 coins

Yara Campbell

•

That sounds helpful - does it handle the fee calculations for bulk filings too? We often do 15-20 continuations at once.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

Yes, it totals everything up by state. Really convenient for budgeting presentations to clients.

0 coins

The timing of fee changes is what kills me. Some states announce increases with 30 days notice, others just implement them. I've had clients upset because the filing costs doubled from our initial estimate. Secretary of state ucc filing fees need better advance notice requirements.

0 coins

Logan Stewart

•

Have you found any states that grandfather fees if you submit before the increase date? That would be a nice policy.

0 coins

Only seen that once, and it was a processing delay on their end, not official policy.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

Most states I deal with are pretty rigid about fee collection. Pay the current rate or get rejected.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

Anyone else notice that amendment fees are often higher than initial filing fees? Makes no sense to me. A UCC-3 to add collateral shouldn't cost more than the original UCC-1. But I've seen states where the amendment fee is 150% of the initial filing fee.

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

I think it's because amendments require more manual review by the filing office staff. At least that's what one SOS clerk told me.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

That explanation doesn't hold water for electronic filings though. It's all automated processing.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

For continuation planning, I always add 20% buffer to my fee estimates. Secretary of state ucc filing fees have this annoying habit of increasing right when you need to file. The buffer has saved me from having to go back to clients for additional funds multiple times. It's just the cost of doing business with an inconsistent system.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

20% buffer is smart. I've been using 15% but might need to increase that based on recent experiences.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Do you track which states are most likely to have fee increases? I feel like some are more predictable than others.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

States with budget issues tend to increase filing fees more frequently. It's an easy revenue source for them.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

The real frustration is when you're dealing with fixture filings. Some states charge the same fee as regular UCC filings, others add a premium for the real estate records coordination. Secretary of state ucc filing fees for fixtures can be 2-3x higher than personal property filings in certain jurisdictions.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

Fixture filings are their own special nightmare. Between the UCC office and the real estate records, you never know what you're going to pay.

0 coins

At least fixture filings are less common. I can't imagine dealing with fee variations on those regularly.

0 coins

I've started including a fee disclaimer in all my client engagement letters. Something like 'filing fees subject to change without notice.' Covers me when states implement surprise increases. The variability in secretary of state ucc filing fees makes it impossible to give firm cost estimates for multi-state transactions.

0 coins

Logan Stewart

•

Good idea on the disclaimer. I might steal that language for my own agreements.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

Do you itemize the fees by state in your client bills? I've been doing lump sum but wondering if transparency helps.

0 coins

I itemize everything. Clients appreciate seeing exactly where their money goes, especially when one state is significantly more expensive.

0 coins

Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and secretary of state ucc filing fees have definitely increased faster than inflation. Used to be most states were in the $10-20 range, now it's more like $15-50. The electronic filing was supposed to reduce their costs but somehow fees keep going up.

0 coins

Yara Campbell

•

That's a good point about electronic filing. The cost savings should have been passed on to filers but it seems like the opposite happened.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

States probably saw electronic filing as an opportunity to increase revenue while reducing their processing costs. Win-win for them.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

I actually tried using Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it's been great for fee tracking. Upload your UCC documents and it shows current fees plus any upcoming changes they've identified. Saved me from a fee increase surprise last week on a batch of terminations.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

How current is their fee information? Some of these state websites are terrible about posting updates.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

Seems very current. Much better than trying to navigate SOS websites that haven't been updated since 2019.

0 coins

The inconsistency in secretary of state ucc filing fees is just part of the broader problem with UCC filing systems. Until there's some federal standardization - which will never happen - we're stuck managing 50 different fee structures. At least most states have reasonable online payment systems now.

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

Federal standardization would be amazing but you're right, it'll never happen. States make too much money from filing fees.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

The online payment systems are definitely better than the old days. Though some states still have clunky interfaces.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

I just want consistency. Is that too much to ask? Same forms, same fees, same deadlines. But I guess that's wishful thinking.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today