Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I've seen cover pages get rejected for using the wrong filing office. Make sure you're submitting to the same office that accepted the original UCC-1. If the debtor moved to a different state, that can complicate assignment filings and cover page requirements.
Then you should be fine on jurisdiction. But double-check that the filing office address on your cover page matches where you're actually submitting.
I had a rejection because I put the wrong SOS address on the cover page even though I submitted it to the right place. They're really nitpicky about details.
Last resort suggestion - call the SOS office directly and ask what's wrong with your cover page. Sometimes they'll tell you exactly what they need to see. I know it's frustrating having to call but it beats more rejections and delays.
Yeah, sometimes a 5-minute phone call saves days of back-and-forth rejections. Ask specifically about cover page format for UCC assignments.
Before you call, try running your documents through Certana.ai's verification tool. Upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 assignment and it'll check for inconsistencies that commonly cause rejections. Might solve the problem without having to wait on hold for an hour.
Join the conversation
The security agreement meaning really comes down to this: it's the document that gives the lender rights in your collateral if you default. Everything else - payment terms, insurance, maintenance requirements - is just additional loan conditions. For your equipment financing, focus on making sure the collateral description is accurate and the granting language is clear. The UCC-1 filing then makes that security interest effective against third parties.
This helps clarify things. So the security agreement is really the 'why' and the UCC-1 is the 'how' of perfection?
That's a good way to think about it. Security agreement creates the rights, UCC-1 filing protects those rights against other creditors.
Just went through this exact process for CNC equipment financing. Make sure your security agreement includes proper default cure periods and notice requirements. Some lenders try to include hair-trigger default provisions that can cause problems if you miss a payment by a day or two. The security agreement meaning includes protecting your rights as debtor, not just giving rights to the secured party.
Usually 10-30 days depending on the lender and deal size. Make sure you negotiate something workable for your cash flow cycle.
Also make sure the default definition isn't too broad. Some agreements include 'material adverse change' clauses that are way too subjective.
Join the conversation
I had a similar situation last year and ended up calling the UCC division directly. They were actually pretty helpful in explaining exactly what name format they had on file versus what I was submitting. Might be worth a phone call before refiling.
Good idea. I'll try calling them tomorrow morning to get clarification on the exact name format they have indexed.
They're usually busiest mid-morning, so try calling right when they open or later in the afternoon.
Before you refile anything, I'd suggest running all your documents through a verification check. I started using Certana.ai after a similar debtor name disaster and it's saved me multiple times. You just upload your UCC-1, the amendment, and your draft continuation as PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies immediately. Would have caught this indexing issue before you filed.
That sounds really useful. Does it work with documents from different time periods or just current filings?
Works with any UCC documents you upload. Really helpful for catching those subtle name differences that cause rejections.
Join the conversation
Whatever you decide, make sure your collateral description is bulletproof. I've seen too many UCC filings get challenged because the description was too vague about whether the equipment was fixtures or not.
This is so true. The description needs to be specific enough to identify the collateral but broad enough to cover variations.
Based on everything discussed here, I'd probably go with the UCC-1 fixture filing approach but also get a subordination agreement from the existing mortgage holder if possible. That gives you the best protection without the complexity of a new mortgage.
That sounds like a reasonable compromise. I'll talk to our counsel about drafting the subordination request.
Make sure your counsel reviews the existing mortgage documents first. Sometimes the subordination language is already built in for purchase money security interests.
Ella Thompson
Quick update for everyone still reading - just called the Ohio SOS office and they confirmed that coupon fields on electronic UCC forms can be left blank. They said it's leftover language from their old paper system.
0 coins
Ella Thompson
•No problem. Sometimes a quick phone call saves hours of research.
0 coins
JacksonHarris
•Good thinking. The SOS staff usually know which fields actually matter and which are just form artifacts.
0 coins
Jeremiah Brown
This whole thread has been super helpful. I was also confused about coupon references on UCC forms. Sounds like the consensus is to ignore those fields and focus on the substantive filing requirements - debtor names, collateral descriptions, and filing number accuracy.
0 coins
Jeremiah Brown
•Same here. Sometimes the old saying 'when in doubt, ask the community' really pays off.
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
•This forum is great for clearing up these kinds of practical filing questions that don't get covered in the formal training materials.
0 coins