< Back to UCC Document Community

Michael Adams

Virginia SOS UCC search keeps giving me weird results - help with secretary of state UCC search

I'm trying to do a UCC search through the Virginia Secretary of State database and running into some confusing results. My client is asking me to verify whether there are any existing liens on equipment they're purchasing, and when I search the debtor name I'm getting hits that don't seem to match exactly. Some show similar company names but with LLC vs Inc differences, and others have middle initials that might or might not be the same entity. The search interface doesn't make it clear which results are actually relevant to my specific debtor. Has anyone dealt with Virginia's UCC search system recently? I need to make sure I'm not missing any active filings that could affect this transaction. The equipment purchase is for $180K so I can't afford to miss anything important.

Natalie Wang

•

Virginia's search can be tricky with name variations. Are you doing exact match searches or broad searches? The system treats 'Company LLC' and 'Company, LLC' as different entries sometimes.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

I tried both ways but still getting results that seem borderline. Some have extra punctuation or spacing differences.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

That's the worst part about UCC searches - you never know if you're missing something due to name formatting.

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

Had the same issue last month with a Virginia filing. The debtor name matching rules are really strict but the search results don't always reflect that clearly. I ended up having to cross-reference multiple variations manually.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

How did you handle the variations? Did you search every possible combination?

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

Pretty much. I searched with and without commas, periods, different abbreviations. It was tedious but necessary for a large transaction.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the debtor's charter documents and it automatically cross-checks name variations against UCC databases. Saves hours of manual searching and catches inconsistencies you might miss.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Virginia SOS system has been updated recently but the search logic is still problematic. Make sure you're checking both active and lapsed filings since some might be in continuation status.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Good point about lapsed filings. Should I be worried about filings that show as 'lapsed' in the results?

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Depends on when they lapsed and whether continuation statements were filed. Lapsed doesn't always mean terminated.

0 coins

Wait, I thought lapsed meant the UCC-1 expired? Are you saying some could still be active?

0 coins

Madison Allen

•

I hate Virginia's search interface! Last week I spent 3 hours trying to figure out if 'ABC Manufacturing Inc' was the same as 'ABC Mfg Inc' in their system. The results page doesn't give you enough context.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

Tell me about it. I've had clients miss important filings because of these search quirks. The system really needs an overhaul.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

At least it's better than it was 5 years ago when half the searches would time out completely.

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

For equipment financing, you definitely want to be thorough. I always run searches on the exact business name from the articles of incorporation, plus common variations. Also check if they've had any name changes recently.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

That's a good point about name changes. Where would I find records of business name changes?

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

Check the Virginia SCC business entity search, not just the UCC database. Look for amendment filings to the articles of incorporation.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

This is getting complicated. Maybe there's a service that does this automatically?

0 coins

I had a similar situation with a $200K equipment deal. Found out I had missed a UCC filing because of a small punctuation difference in the debtor name. Cost me a lot of headaches with the lender. Now I triple-check everything.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Oh no, what happened with the lender?

0 coins

They almost pulled the financing when they discovered the existing lien during their own due diligence. I looked incompetent.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

This is exactly why I recommend the Certana.ai tool. It would have caught that punctuation issue immediately by comparing your search results against the actual charter documents.

0 coins

Pro tip: when you get your search results, look at the actual UCC-1 documents, not just the summary data. Sometimes the summary truncates important details about the debtor name or collateral description.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Good advice. I was just looking at the summary results. I'll pull the actual documents.

0 coins

Zara Perez

•

Yes! The summary view in Virginia often cuts off longer business names or doesn't show all the 'also known as' variations.

0 coins

Daniel Rogers

•

The document images can be hard to read sometimes though. Wish there was a better way to analyze them quickly.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

Are you checking federal tax liens too? Those won't show up in the UCC search but could affect your client's transaction.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

I hadn't thought about tax liens. Where do I search for those in Virginia?

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

Federal tax liens are usually filed with the local clerk of court or sometimes with the Secretary of State. Check both places.

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

Just went through this exact thing last month. The key is understanding that Virginia follows the 'seriously misleading' standard for debtor names. Small variations might not invalidate a filing, but they make searching really difficult.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

What's the 'seriously misleading' standard? How do I know if a name variation would be considered misleading?

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

Basically, if a reasonable searcher using standard search logic would find the filing, then the name variation is probably okay. But it's subjective.

0 coins

Mohammed Khan

•

That sounds really vague. How are we supposed to make decisions based on 'reasonable searcher' standards?

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Update: I ended up finding two additional UCC filings that didn't show up in my initial searches because of name formatting issues. One had an extra space and the other used '&' instead of 'and'. Both were still active and would have affected the transaction. Thanks everyone for the advice about checking variations!

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

Glad you found them! That could have been a disaster if they surfaced later.

0 coins

This is why UCC searching is so stressful. You never know what you might be missing.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

For future reference, I've had good luck with Certana.ai's UCC verification tool for catching these exact issues. You upload the entity documents and it automatically flags potential name mismatches across different UCC filings. Would have saved you a lot of manual searching.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today