< Back to UCC Document Community

Chloe Taylor

UCC deposit account definition causing my filing rejection - help needed

Got my UCC-1 rejected yesterday and I'm honestly lost here. The collateral description section is where they flagged it. I wrote "deposit accounts at First National Bank" thinking that was specific enough but apparently not. The rejection notice said something about insufficient collateral description under Article 9 requirements. I'm securing a $180K equipment loan and the bank wants a blanket lien on all our deposit accounts as additional collateral. Problem is I have no idea how to properly describe deposit accounts in the UCC filing. Do I need account numbers? Just the bank name? The loan officer keeps saying "make it broad enough to cover everything" but that seems to conflict with the specificity requirements. Anyone dealt with deposit account collateral descriptions before? This is holding up the entire loan closing and I'm getting pressure from all sides. The SOS office wasn't helpful when I called - just told me to "review Article 9 requirements" which doesn't tell me much.

ShadowHunter

•

Deposit accounts are tricky in UCC filings because they're a specific type of collateral under Article 9. You can't just say "deposit accounts" - you need to be more descriptive but not necessarily list every account number. Try something like "all deposit accounts maintained by debtor at any financial institution" or if you want to be more specific "all deposit accounts maintained by debtor at First National Bank, including but not limited to checking, savings, and money market accounts.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

This is exactly right. The key is being descriptive enough that a third party could identify what's covered without being so specific that you miss accounts opened later.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

That makes sense but won't "all deposit accounts" be too broad? I thought the trend was toward more specific descriptions after all those court cases about overbroad collateral descriptions.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

No, deposit accounts are different from other collateral types. The courts generally allow broader descriptions for deposit accounts because they're easily identifiable. Just make sure you include the debtor entity name correctly.

0 coins

Had this exact same issue last month! The secret is understanding that deposit accounts are defined in UCC 9-102(a)(29) as "a demand, time, savings, passbook, or similar account maintained with a bank." Your description needs to make clear you're talking about this specific type of collateral, not just any money the debtor might have somewhere. I ended up using "all deposit accounts as defined in UCC Section 9-102(a)(29) maintained by debtor" and it went through fine. The specificity comes from referencing the UCC definition, not from listing account numbers.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

Wait, should I actually cite the UCC section in my collateral description? That seems formal but if it works...

0 coins

You don't have to cite it but it doesn't hurt. The important thing is using language that makes clear you mean deposit accounts as defined under Article 9, not some broader category of assets.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

I always include the UCC reference for deposit accounts. Prevents arguments later about what was intended to be covered.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

ugh this stuff is so confusing! I spent hours trying to figure out the right wording for our deposit account collateral last year. Ended up having to refile twice because the first description was too vague and the second was apparently too specific (??). Finally found this tool called Certana.ai where you can upload your UCC documents and it checks everything against the actual UCC requirements. It caught that my debtor name didn't match exactly between my charter documents and the UCC-1, plus it verified my collateral description would meet the Article 9 standards. Saved me from another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

Interesting, I've never heard of that tool. Does it actually understand the nuances of different collateral types like deposit accounts?

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Yeah it's pretty smart about collateral descriptions. You just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral language. For deposit accounts it specifically looks for the Article 9 requirements.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

Sounds too good to be true but I'm desperate enough to try anything at this point. My attorney charges $400 every time I need to bounce UCC language off him.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

The rejection was probably because "deposit accounts at First National Bank" could be interpreted as just accounts currently at that bank, not future accounts. Plus it doesn't make clear whether you mean all types of deposit accounts (checking, savings, CDs, etc.) For a blanket lien, try: "All deposit accounts maintained by debtor, whether now existing or hereafter acquired, including without limitation all checking accounts, savings accounts, time deposits, certificates of deposit, and money market accounts." This covers current and future accounts at any bank, which is probably what your lender wants for a $180K facility.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

That sounds comprehensive but isn't there a risk of being too broad? I keep hearing conflicting advice about specificity requirements.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

For deposit accounts specifically, courts have been pretty lenient with broad descriptions as long as they clearly identify the type of collateral. The "super-generic" problem usually comes up with inventory or equipment descriptions.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

Exactly. Deposit accounts are easier to describe broadly because they're a defined term under the UCC. Unlike "equipment" which could mean anything.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

Been filing UCCs for 15 years and deposit account descriptions trip up everyone at first. The key thing people miss is that "deposit account" has a specific legal meaning under Article 9 - it's not just any account with money in it. Your rejection probably happened because your description was ambiguous about whether you meant deposit accounts (the Article 9 term) or just accounts in general. Adding "as defined in UCC Article 9" or similar language usually clears this up. Also make sure your debtor name matches EXACTLY between your loan documents and the UCC-1. Even small differences like "Inc." vs "Incorporated" can cause problems.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

Good point about the debtor name. I used "ABC Manufacturing Inc" on the UCC but our articles of incorporation say "ABC Manufacturing, Inc." with a comma. Could that comma really matter?

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

YES! That comma absolutely matters. The debtor name has to match the official corporate records exactly. Punctuation, spacing, everything. I've seen deals delayed for weeks over missing commas.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

This is why I hate UCC filings. One missing punctuation mark and months of work goes down the drain.

0 coins

just went through this nightmare myself. deposit accounts are super picky about the wording. ended up having to refile 3 times before getting it right. the SOS office is useless - they just tell you to read the statute but don't explain how to actually apply it. what worked for me was "all deposit accounts of debtor maintained at any financial institution" but I had to make sure the debtor name was perfect first. turns out my LLC had a different name in the state database than what I was using.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

How did you verify the correct debtor name? I'm worried I might have the same issue.

0 coins

had to pull the actual corporate records from the secretary of state. took forever and cost extra fees but at least I knew I had the right name for the filing.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

This is exactly why I started using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier. It checks the debtor name consistency across all your documents automatically.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

I see a lot of confusion here about deposit account vs. other account types. Under UCC 9-102, a deposit account specifically means an account maintained with a BANK - not credit unions, not investment accounts, not escrow accounts. If your collateral includes accounts at credit unions or other non-bank institutions, you need different language. Most people use "all deposit accounts and similar accounts" to cover the borderline cases. Also, be careful about account control agreements. If the bank wants control over the deposit accounts, that's a separate requirement from just filing the UCC-1.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

We do have accounts at a credit union too. So I should say "deposit accounts and similar accounts" instead of just "deposit accounts"?

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Yes, or you could specify "all deposit accounts maintained with banks and all similar accounts maintained with credit unions, savings associations, or other financial institutions.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

Good catch on the bank vs credit union distinction. A lot of people miss that nuance in the UCC definition.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

The deposit account definition issue bit me too when I first started doing UCC filings. What I learned is that you need to think about both the legal definition AND the practical coverage you want. Legally, deposit accounts are defined in UCC 9-102(a)(29). Practically, your lender probably wants security in all liquid assets the debtor might have. I usually go with something like "all deposit accounts, cash, and cash equivalents of debtor, whether now owned or hereafter acquired" to make sure I don't miss anything the lender cares about.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

That's broader than what some others suggested. Do you ever get pushback on the "cash equivalents" language?

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Sometimes, but it depends on the filing office. Most accept it because cash equivalents are pretty well understood in commercial law. Better to be over-inclusive than miss something important.

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

I prefer to stick closer to the UCC definitions and avoid terms like "cash equivalents" that aren't defined in Article 9. But different approaches work in different jurisdictions.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Look, I've been through this exact situation and here's what actually works: forget trying to be creative with the language. Use the standard forms and descriptions that filing offices see all the time. "All deposit accounts" is fine if that's really all you need. "All deposit accounts of the debtor" is better. "All deposit accounts of the debtor, whether now existing or hereafter acquired" is safest. Don't overthink it. The filing offices know what deposit accounts are. Your problem was probably the debtor name, not the collateral description.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

You might be right about the debtor name being the real issue. I'm going to double-check that first before I worry about rewording the collateral section.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Smart move. Fix the debtor name issue first, then worry about collateral language. Most collateral description rejections are actually debtor name problems in disguise.

0 coins

Had a similar rejection on a UCC-1 last week, turned out to be multiple issues - wrong debtor name format AND insufficient collateral description for deposit accounts. What helped me was using one of those document checking services to compare my UCC against my corporate docs. Ended up finding that I had the debtor name wrong (missing the state of incorporation designation) plus my deposit account description was too narrow. Used Certana.ai to verify everything matched up properly before refiling. Second submission went through without issues.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

That's the second mention of that service. Might be worth checking out since I'm clearly missing something in my document review process.

0 coins

It's pretty straightforward - just upload your docs and it flags inconsistencies. For UCC filings it specifically checks debtor name matching and collateral description adequacy.

0 coins

Honestly anything that prevents another rejection cycle is worth trying. These delays are killing my deal timeline.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

The whole deposit account definition thing in UCC filings is unnecessarily complicated. Why can't they just accept "bank accounts" like normal people say? Instead we have to use this technical "deposit account" language that nobody uses in real life. Anyway, what worked for me was copying the exact language from a successful filing I found online: "All deposit accounts maintained by Debtor with any bank, savings and loan association, credit union or other financial institution." Covers everything without getting too fancy.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

Where did you find examples of successful filings? That would be really helpful to see what language actually works.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Just searched UCC databases for similar filings in my state. Found a bunch with deposit account collateral and used language that appeared frequently.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

That's actually a smart approach - see what language the filing office has been accepting rather than trying to reinvent the wheel.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today