UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC filing issues with bond indenture & security agreement - debtor name inconsistencies
Running into problems with our UCC-1 filing related to a bond indenture & security agreement situation. We have a corporate borrower that issued bonds with a security agreement covering equipment and receivables. The bond indenture shows the company name as "MidState Manufacturing Corp" but their articles of incorporation actually show "Mid-State Manufacturing Corporation" (with hyphen and spelled out). The security agreement matches the articles exactly but now our UCC-1 got rejected because we used the bond indenture version of the name. This is for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and we're coming up on our perfection deadline. Has anyone dealt with name discrepancies between bond indentures and security agreements when filing UCC-1s? The SOS rejection notice just says "debtor name does not match exactly" but doesn't specify which document they're comparing against. Need to get this sorted before our 20-day grace period expires.
Join the conversation
UCC filing rejected due to impracticability - debtor name issue
Filed a UCC-1 last month for a commercial equipment loan and got rejected with an impracticability notice. The debtor company changed their legal name twice in the past year - first from ABC Manufacturing LLC to ABC Advanced Manufacturing LLC, then to Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC. I used the most recent name but apparently there's some impracticability issue with the filing. The SOS website just says 'impracticability determined' with no further explanation. This is a $340K equipment financing deal and we need the perfected security interest ASAP. Has anyone dealt with this specific rejection reason? I'm not even sure what impracticability means in UCC context.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Called the UCC division again and finally got someone helpful. They said the impracticability was because they couldn't determine which of the three business names in their system was the correct current debtor. I need to refile with the exact name from the most recent articles AND include a statement about the name changes. Thanks everyone for the advice - especially about the document checking tools.
Great outcome. It's always satisfying when persistence with the filing office pays off and you get a real explanation.
Perfect example of why the debtor name section is so critical. Hope your refiling goes smoothly!
This thread is super helpful. I'm dealing with a similar name change situation and was dreading the potential impracticability rejection. Definitely going to verify my documents before filing.
Definitely recommend that. Would have saved me weeks if I'd caught the name issue upfront.
Same here. Bookmarking this thread for future reference.
UCC search South Dakota showing weird results - am I missing something?
Running into some confusion with a UCC search South Dakota and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. We're trying to verify existing liens on equipment collateral for a potential acquisition, but the search results don't seem to match what we expected based on the debtor's corporate records. The company name shows up differently in their charter docs vs what's appearing in the UCC filings, and I'm not sure if we're looking at the right entity or if there are name variations I should be checking. Has anyone dealt with South Dakota's system recently? Are there specific search strategies that work better for catching all the variations of a business name? This is holding up our due diligence timeline and I really need to make sure we're not missing any existing security interests.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add that I've had success using Certana.ai's document verification tool for exactly this type of situation. Upload your corporate docs and UCC search results and it automatically identifies which filings match your target entity based on name analysis and cross-referencing. Eliminates a lot of the guesswork.
Two people have mentioned that tool now. Sounds like it might be worth trying for this search project.
It really is helpful. Takes the manual comparison work out of the equation and catches things you might overlook.
Quick update on my end - I followed the advice about searching name variations and punctuation differences, and found two additional UCC-1 filings I had missed initially. Also used the registered agent cross-reference suggestion to confirm which ones actually applied to the target company. Thanks for all the helpful suggestions!
Great to hear. Did the additional filings change your assessment of the deal?
Actually yes - found one active equipment lien that wasn't disclosed initially. Good thing we caught it before closing.
UCC-3 form Texas filing got rejected - debtor name issue
Need help with a UCC-3 form Texas situation that's driving me crazy. Filed an amendment last week to add collateral to an existing UCC-1 and the Secretary of State rejected it saying the debtor name doesn't match exactly. The original filing from 2022 has the company name as 'Southwest Equipment Solutions LLC' but our UCC-3 form Texas submission had 'Southwest Equipment Solutions, LLC' with the comma. I thought this was just a formatting thing but apparently not. The underlying loan is for $340K in construction equipment and we need this amendment filed ASAP because the borrower is acquiring additional machinery next month. Has anyone dealt with Texas SOS being this picky about punctuation in debtor names? I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and never had a rejection over a comma before. The continuation isn't due until 2027 so that's not the issue - just need to get this amendment through. Any advice on how to handle this UCC-3 form Texas rejection would be appreciated.
Join the conversation
Honestly this kind of rejection makes me want to use one of those automated checking services. A colleague mentioned Certana.ai recently - apparently you just upload your UCC documents and it catches these name consistency issues before filing. Might be worth the peace of mind for future filings.
I've been thinking about trying something like that too. These manual reviews are so error-prone and the rejections cost time and money.
Same here. If it can prevent filing fees being wasted on rejections, probably pays for itself pretty quickly.
Update us when you get the corrected filing through! I'm dealing with a similar Texas UCC-3 situation and want to know if fixing the exact name formatting solves it completely.
Will do. Planning to refile tomorrow with the exact name from the original UCC-1. Fingers crossed!
Good luck! Texas SOS processing times have been pretty reasonable lately, so you should know within a few days.
Georgia UCC Statement Request Form - Need Help Finding the Right One
I'm trying to locate information about a UCC filing in Georgia and I'm getting confused about which statement request form I need to use. My company provided financing for some manufacturing equipment last year and we filed our UCC-1 through the Georgia SOS portal. Now I need to pull a copy of what's actually on file to verify the debtor name matches exactly what we have in our loan docs. The Georgia Secretary of State website has multiple forms and I'm not sure if I need their "Information Request" form or if there's a specific UCC statement request form. We're doing an audit of all our secured positions and need to make sure every filing shows the correct legal entity name. Has anyone dealt with requesting UCC statements from Georgia recently? What's the current process and which form should I be using?
Join the conversation
Just make sure whatever form you use, you include all the required information - debtor name exactly as you think it was filed, secured party name, and your contact info. Missing information just slows down the process.
And double-check the mailing address requirements. Some states are picky about where they send responses.
Bottom line - yes, use the UCC-11 form for Georgia. It's their standard information request form and covers what you need. But honestly for audit purposes, I'd recommend running your documents through something like Certana.ai first to identify which filings actually need follow-up. Saves time and money.
Thanks everyone. I think I'll try the document verification approach first to see what potential issues exist, then request certified copies for the problem filings. Appreciate all the guidance!
Good strategy. Keep us posted on how it works out - always helpful to hear about real-world audit experiences.
Chloe Davis
For future reference, when you have bond indenture & security agreement deals, I always recommend running all the documents through a consistency check before filing anything. There's actually a tool called Certana.ai where you can upload your bond indenture, security agreement, and articles of incorporation and it automatically identifies any discrepancies between the documents. Super helpful for catching these name issues before they cause filing rejections.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
Pretty much instant - just upload the PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies right away. Much faster than manually comparing everything.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
Sounds like it could save a lot of back-and-forth with rejected filings.
0 coins
Anastasia Smirnova
Make sure when you file the UCC-3 amendment that you include both the incorrect name that was originally filed AND the correct name you're amending to. Some states want to see both versions clearly identified in the amendment form. Also keep copies of everything for your lien perfection documentation.
0 coins
Zara Shah
Is there a time limit on how long after the original filing you can submit an amendment for name corrections?
0 coins
Anastasia Smirnova
You can amend UCC filings pretty much any time during their effective period, but obviously sooner is better for perfection purposes.
0 coins