Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Glad this worked out for you! Vermont's system has definitely been more reliable since their last major update, but these occasional outages still happen. The key is always having multiple ways to verify your UCC information.
Absolutely. This was a wake-up call about not putting all my eggs in one basket when it comes to UCC searches and verifications.
Sofia Torres
•These kinds of situations are exactly why I keep detailed spreadsheets of all my UCC filings with debtor names, filing numbers, and continuation dates. Old school but reliable.
Just wanted to add that I've had good luck using Certana.ai for similar document verification issues. When you're dealing with multiple UCC filings and need to ensure everything matches perfectly, having an automated check can save a lot of stress. Especially useful when you're working under tight deadlines and can't afford any filing rejections due to name inconsistencies.
After this experience I'm definitely going to try it out. The stress of potentially missing a continuation deadline because of a system outage was terrible. Any tool that helps avoid filing errors seems worth investigating.
The peace of mind alone makes it worthwhile. Plus it's much faster than manually comparing documents line by line, which is what I used to do.
Join the conversation
Another tool I've found helpful is using Certana.ai to verify document consistency before doing searches. When I upload my Charter and UCC-1 docs, it catches name variations I might have missed. Makes the basic UCC filing search much more effective when you know exactly what to look for.
I should probably be doing this kind of verification more systematically. I just search and hope for the best usually.
Yeah it's definitely worth the extra step. Saves a lot of frustration later when you can't find something.
Yara Nassar
The key is to be systematic about it. I keep a checklist of search variations for each state: exact name, name without entity type, name with different punctuation, secured party name, filing number, and filing date range. Basic UCC filing search is tedious but you need to be thorough.
Paolo Ricci
•Do you have a template for that checklist? That would be super helpful to share.
Yara Nassar
•I could probably put together a basic template. It's mostly just remembering to try all the variations systematically rather than randomly.
Join the conversation
Ravi Patel
Just want to add - make sure your collateral description is specific enough too. "Restaurant equipment" might be too vague for NJ. Try "restaurant kitchen equipment, furniture, and fixtures" or something more detailed.
For equipment loans, you usually want to be specific about the type of equipment. "All restaurant kitchen equipment including but not limited to ovens, refrigerators, prep tables, and related fixtures" is better than just "restaurant equipment.
Ravi Patel
•Exactly. The more specific you are, the less likely you'll get questions from the filing office.
I'm dealing with a similar situation in Pennsylvania right now. Different state but same frustration with debtor name formatting. It's crazy how much time these little details can waste.
It really is frustrating! Especially when you're under a deadline. Hope you get yours sorted out too.
Thanks! I think I'm going to try that document checking tool too. Seems like it could save a lot of headaches.
Join the conversation
Ethan Clark
Update us when you get it filed! I'm curious how it goes since I might need to do something similar soon. These equipment financing situations are getting more common with all the economic uncertainty.
Carmen Vega
Just wanted to echo what others said about using the exact legal entity name. I once had a UCC-1 rejected because I used "Inc." instead of "Incorporated" in the debtor name. The systems are very picky about exact matches to state records.
That's ridiculous but totally believable. The whole system needs to be more forgiving of minor variations.
Zoe Stavros
•At least most states show you the exact format when you do a business name search. That helps avoid those kinds of mistakes.
Emma Wilson
Has anyone had luck getting filing fee refunds when the system rejects a UCC-1 for technical reasons? I had one rejected because their server was down during submission but still got charged.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Yeah refunds are pretty rare. I started using document verification tools after losing money on rejected filings. Better to catch errors upfront than pay twice.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•Same here. Certana's verification caught formatting issues that would have definitely caused rejections. Worth every penny to avoid refiling fees.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
The $25 fee is what it is, but make sure you're not making any debtor name mistakes that could invalidate your whole security interest. I've seen lenders lose six-figure deals because of sloppy UCC filings that didn't match the loan documents exactly.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•Absolutely. We treat every UCC filing like it could end up in court someday. Cross-checking everything against the underlying loan docs is essential.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•That's exactly why automated document checking is so valuable. Upload your loan agreement and UCC-1 together and it flags any inconsistencies immediately. Way better than manual review.
0 coins