UCC Filing Issues with Property Offered as Security for Loan Agreement
Having major problems with our UCC-1 filing getting rejected by the SOS office. We're trying to perfect our security interest in equipment that our borrower put up as collateral for a $485K commercial loan. The rejection notice says our collateral description is "insufficient" but we described it as "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures used in debtor's manufacturing operations located at 1247 Industrial Blvd." This is our third attempt and we're running out of time before the loan closes next week. The debtor name matches exactly what's on their articles of incorporation, so that's not the issue. Our loan agreement clearly identifies this property as security but somehow the UCC office doesn't think our description is adequate? Anyone dealt with similar collateral description problems? We've been doing equipment financing for 8 years and never had this much trouble with a filing. Really need to get this perfected ASAP.
43 comments


Fatima Al-Rashid
Equipment descriptions can be tricky - sounds like they want more specificity. Instead of "all equipment" try listing actual categories like "metal fabrication equipment," "CNC machinery," "welding equipment," etc. Some states are really picky about generic descriptions these days.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That makes sense. Should we also include serial numbers or model info for the major pieces?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•Serial numbers aren't required for UCC filings but they don't hurt. Focus on being descriptive enough that a third party could identify what you're claiming as collateral.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
I've seen this exact rejection before. The phrase "used in debtor's manufacturing operations" might be the problem - it's conditional language. Try "equipment, machinery, and fixtures located at [address]" without the "used in" qualifier.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Interesting point about conditional language. We were trying to be specific but maybe we were actually being too restrictive?
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Exactly. You want to cast a wide net with your description while still being reasonable. The UCC doesn't require you to limit collateral to only equipment "used for" specific purposes.
0 coins
Aaliyah Jackson
•This is why I always keep my descriptions broad. "All equipment" usually works fine if you add the location.
0 coins
KylieRose
Had a similar nightmare with collateral descriptions last month. After two rejections, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool before submitting. You can upload your loan agreement and proposed UCC-1 to check if the collateral descriptions align properly. Caught three inconsistencies that would have caused more rejections.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Never heard of that tool. Does it actually compare the loan docs to the UCC filing?
0 coins
KylieRose
•Yeah, you just upload PDFs of both documents and it flags any mismatches in debtor names, collateral descriptions, and other key details. Saved me probably 2-3 weeks of back and forth with the filing office.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•That sounds too good to be true but honestly anything that prevents rejections is worth trying at this point.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
Why are you including fixtures in an equipment financing deal? Fixtures have special rules and might be causing confusion. If you don't actually have a security interest in fixtures, remove that from your description.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Good catch. Our loan agreement does cover some installed equipment that might be considered fixtures, but you're right that it complicates things.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•If you do have fixture collateral, you might need a fixture filing instead of or in addition to the regular UCC-1. That's a whole different set of requirements.
0 coins
Liam Murphy
•Fixture filings are such a pain. The recording requirements vary by county and half the time you need to file in real estate records too.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
I'm having the EXACT same problem with a UCC-1 for inventory collateral. Third rejection and they won't even tell me specifically what's wrong with the description. This system is completely broken.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
•The SOS offices have gotten so picky lately. Used to be you could file "all assets" and they'd accept it.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Right? Now they want you to be a mind reader. How am I supposed to know what level of detail they want if they won't tell me?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•The revised Article 9 guidance from a few years ago made them stricter about "all assets" descriptions. They want reasonable identification of collateral types now.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
Try breaking down your description into specific categories: "Manufacturing equipment including but not limited to: metalworking machinery, assembly line equipment, testing apparatus, and related tools and accessories, all located at [address]." This format usually works.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•This is really helpful. Should I also mention that it includes after-acquired equipment?
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Only if your loan agreement actually covers after-acquired property. Don't claim broader collateral than you actually have rights to.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
•After-acquired clauses can get complicated depending on the state. Make sure your loan docs support whatever you claim in the UCC.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
Have you double-checked that you're filing in the right state? If the debtor is organized in Delaware but the equipment is in Ohio, you might need to file in both places depending on the collateral type.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Debtor is a local LLC organized in the same state where the equipment is located, so that shouldn't be the issue.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
•Good, just wanted to make sure. I've seen people struggle with filings for weeks only to discover they were in the wrong jurisdiction.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
Whatever you do, don't wait until the last minute to refile. If this is for a closing next week, you need to get a clean filing accepted ASAP to avoid timing issues with your loan documents.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. The loan docs reference the UCC filing and if we can't get it perfected, the whole deal could fall through.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
•Might be worth calling the SOS office directly to see if they can give you more specific guidance on what they want to see in the collateral description.
0 coins
LilMama23
•Some offices will do that but others just refer you back to the rejection notice. Hit or miss depending on who you get on the phone.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
I actually had success with the Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my security agreement and UCC draft and it caught that I was using slightly different terminology between the two documents. Once I made them consistent, the filing went through on the first try.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Ok you're the second person to mention this. How long does the verification take?
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
•Pretty much instant. You upload the PDFs and it shows you a comparison report highlighting any inconsistencies. Way faster than manual review.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Might be worth a shot before filing attempt number four. At least you'd know if there are obvious problems.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
The key thing is making sure your UCC collateral description doesn't conflict with what's actually in your loan agreement. Sometimes lawyers get creative with the UCC language and it doesn't match the security agreement terms exactly.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That's a really good point. I should probably compare our draft UCC to the actual loan language word for word.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
•Exactly. The UCC description should be broad enough to be effective but consistent enough with your loan docs that there's no question about what collateral you're claiming.
0 coins
KylieRose
•This is exactly what the Certana tool helps with - it flags those kinds of inconsistencies automatically so you don't have to do the line-by-line comparison manually.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
Quick update - took everyone's advice and rewrote the collateral description with specific equipment categories and removed the conditional language. Also used the Certana verification tool to make sure everything matched our loan docs. Filing was accepted this morning! Thanks for all the help.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•Great news! Glad the specific categories approach worked out.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Awesome that the document verification caught the issues before you filed again. That tool has been a lifesaver for me.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
•Perfect timing with your closing next week. Nothing worse than UCC filing delays holding up a loan closing.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•This gives me hope for my inventory filing. Going to try the specific categories approach too.
0 coins