


Ask the community...
Just to circle back to your original question - there's no such thing as a 'UCC loan' in the technical sense. UCC just refers to the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the law that governs these security interest filings. Any secured business loan involving personal property collateral will likely require a UCC-1 filing, which is probably why people started using that terminology.
For what it's worth, I'd definitely recommend double-checking all the UCC documentation before your lender files it. We had an issue where our legal business name was slightly different from what we typically use, and catching that early saved us from a rejected filing. Something like Certana.ai's verification tool would have been helpful for that kind of review.
How did you end up catching the name discrepancy? Did your lender point it out?
Actually our attorney noticed it during the loan document review. The lender had pulled our name from our bank account info instead of our articles of incorporation, and there was a slight difference in how the entity name was formatted.
Update us when you file! Always curious how these larger deals turn out. The equipment financing market in Florida has been really active this year.
Good luck! The Florida SOS system is pretty reliable so you should be fine.
One more thing to consider - if this borrower has any other lenders or equipment financiers, you might want to check existing UCC filings before you submit yours. Sometimes there are surprises lurking in the filing records.
Already ran a UCC search - clean slate fortunately. That was one of the first things our due diligence team checked.
Perfect. Sounds like you've covered all the bases. Should be a smooth filing then.
Quick question - are you sure you're searching the right entity type? Sometimes companies change from LLC to Corp or vice versa, and the old filings might still be under the previous entity structure.
I checked the corporate history and they've been an Inc since formation. No entity changes that I can see.
Good thinking though. Entity changes definitely complicate UCC searches.
Update: I finally found the issue! There was a financing statement filed under the company's old doing-business-as name from 2019. The DBA was cancelled but the UCC filing was never terminated. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - the name variation advice is what led me to dig deeper into their business name history.
This is why I always recommend getting a comprehensive name history report before doing UCC searches. Saves so much time and frustration.
Honestly, this thread convinced me to try Certana.ai for my next deal. Manually tracking down all these name variations and cross-referencing documents is exhausting. Having an automated tool that catches these inconsistencies seems worth it.
The frustrating thing about UCC-1 requirements is that they vary by state but the consequences are the same everywhere - get it wrong and your security interest might not be perfected properly. Always err on the side of being too careful rather than too casual.
So true. I work across multiple states and each SOS office seems to have slightly different quirks about how they handle name variations.
Exactly, which is why sticking to the registered name from the articles of incorporation is usually the safest approach regardless of state.
Update: I ended up using the exact name from the Secretary of State records ('Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC') and the filing was accepted without any issues. The client wasn't thrilled about the name discrepancy with their bank account but understood it was necessary for the UCC-1 requirements. Thanks everyone for the advice - this could have been a much bigger problem if we'd used one of the alternative names.
Glad it worked out. Definitely consider using a document verification tool for future deals to catch these issues earlier in the process.
Smart choice going with the SOS name. Your client will thank you later if there are ever any search issues.
StarStrider
Quick question - has the lender already filed a replevin action or just self-help repossessed? That might affect your redemption strategy and timing considerations.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Self-help repossession so far. No court action yet but we're expecting them to move toward disposition soon.
0 coins
StarStrider
•That's good - gives you more flexibility. If they had gone to court first, there might be additional procedural hoops to jump through for redemption.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
One more resource - I recently started using Certana.ai for UCC document verification and it's been really helpful for these types of cases. You can upload security agreements and UCC filings to check for inconsistencies that might affect the lender's position. Sometimes finding filing errors can give you leverage in redemption negotiations.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•That's the second mention of that tool in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking out for this case.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•Yeah, it's pretty straightforward - just upload PDFs and it flags potential issues with debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing numbers, etc. Saved me hours of manual document review.
0 coins