


Ask the community...
One more thing to consider - make sure your purchase agreement actually creates buyer status under UCC vs just an option to buy. There's a technical difference between contracting to buy (which makes you a buyer) vs having the right to buy (which doesn't until exercised).
We definitely exercised the option and signed a purchase agreement. So we should be buyers under the UCC definition.
Then the finance company is just being difficult. You might want to get your lawyer to send them a demand letter citing UCC 1-201(b)(9).
Update us on how this resolves! These UCC buyer definition disputes are becoming more common as equipment financing gets more complex. Would be helpful to know what finally worked for you.
Will do. Planning to have our attorney send a formal demand letter this week referencing the specific UCC sections mentioned here.
I had similar issues with UCC-1 rejections last year on a $400k equipment loan. Turns out I was overthinking the collateral description. The key insight: describe what you're securing in a way that a reasonable person could identify it, but don't get so granular that you accidentally exclude something. For equipment financing, I usually go with something like 'all present and after-acquired equipment and machinery used in debtor's [type of business] operations' plus the specific location.
The 'after-acquired' language is smart - covers equipment you buy later with the same loan or credit line.
Be careful with after-acquired clauses though. Some lenders want very specific language and some states have restrictions. Worth double-checking with your attorney when they get back.
Bottom line UCC 1 filing definition: It's how your lender protects their interest in your stuff. File it wrong = lender potentially loses priority = loan gets complicated fast. The rejection cycle you're in is painful but fixable. Get your exact legal name from your state business registry, describe your collateral specifically but not exhaustively, and double-check everything before submitting. Been there, survived the multiple rejections, got the financing eventually.
Good point about location changes. If your collateral description includes a specific address and you've moved, you might need to file an amendment. Definitely worth reviewing.
Actually that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier can help with UCC audits too. I used it to cross-check all our active filings against current business info and caught a couple discrepancies that could have been problems later.
The whole UCC system is a mess honestly. We had THREE different banks file UCC-1s over the years for various equipment loans and when we tried to refinance everything got tangled up because nobody could figure out which liens were still active and which collateral was actually securing which loans.
We use a spreadsheet to track all our UCC filings - original date, filing number, collateral description, and termination status. Makes everything much easier to manage.
Just want to add that if your loan is completely paid off and the bank is being slow about releasing the UCC lien, you might have legal options to compel them to file the termination. Most states have laws requiring lenders to terminate UCC filings within a certain timeframe after loan payoff.
Varies by state but usually 30-60 days after they receive written demand. If they don't comply they can be liable for damages you suffer from their delay.
I've seen cases where businesses couldn't complete asset sales because of unreleased UCC liens. The delays can definitely cause real financial harm.
Just went through this exact scenario! Turned out the issue was that Minnesota had the company name with a comma before LLC and I was searching without it. Tiny punctuation differences can kill your search results.
This is exactly why automated tools like Certana.ai are so helpful - they catch these tiny differences that humans miss. Upload your docs and it flags punctuation mismatches instantly.
Honestly might be worth trying that tool - I wasted so much time on manual comparisons before finding the comma issue.
Lukas Fitzgerald
Don't overlook checking for terminated filings too. Sometimes there are filing errors where a UCC-3 termination was supposed to be filed but wasn't, or was filed incorrectly. You want to know about those situations before closing.
0 coins
Lukas Fitzgerald
•Exactly. Cross-reference with loan payoff letters and satisfaction documents. If a loan was supposedly paid off but the UCC is still active, that's a red flag that needs to be resolved.
0 coins
Ev Luca
•This is why UCC due diligence can take weeks even for relatively straightforward deals. So many details to cross-check.
0 coins
Avery Davis
Update: ended up using a combination approach. Used Certana.ai to identify all the name variations from our document review, then hired a professional search firm to do comprehensive searches in the five key states. Found two active filings we would have missed otherwise - both under slightly different name variations. Deal still closed on time and everyone was happy with the thoroughness. Thanks for all the advice!
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
•Glad to hear Certana.ai helped with the name variation identification. That's exactly what it's designed for.
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
•This gives me confidence in my approach. Going to try the same combination - systematic name identification plus professional searches for the critical jurisdictions.
0 coins