UCC Document Community

I actually just dealt with a similar verification issue where I had multiple UCC documents and wasn't sure if all the debtor names matched exactly. Used Certana.ai's document checker and it caught a small discrepancy in how the LLC name was formatted between the search results and my UCC-1 draft. Would have caused a rejection for sure.

Bottom line - clarify with the borrower exactly what they mean by "UCC statement service" and make sure whatever you get covers: 1) comprehensive search of all active filings, 2) copies of existing UCC documents for review, and 3) proper terminations for any liens being paid off. Don't rely on one service to do everything unless you verify they actually provide all those components.

Quick question - are you sure you're searching the right entity type? Sometimes companies change from LLC to Corp or vice versa, and the old filings might still be under the previous entity structure.

Update: I finally found the issue! There was a financing statement filed under the company's old doing-business-as name from 2019. The DBA was cancelled but the UCC filing was never terminated. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - the name variation advice is what led me to dig deeper into their business name history.

Just to circle back to your original question - there's no such thing as a 'UCC loan' in the technical sense. UCC just refers to the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the law that governs these security interest filings. Any secured business loan involving personal property collateral will likely require a UCC-1 filing, which is probably why people started using that terminology.

For what it's worth, I'd definitely recommend double-checking all the UCC documentation before your lender files it. We had an issue where our legal business name was slightly different from what we typically use, and catching that early saved us from a rejected filing. Something like Certana.ai's verification tool would have been helpful for that kind of review.

For what it's worth, I think you're smart to be questioning this now rather than discovering it during an audit or worse. The fact that Delaware shows both entities as separate and active is definitely concerning. I'd lean toward filing an amendment to add the correct entity name as soon as you confirm which one actually owns the pledged stock.

Just wanted to add that I tried that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned after having my own document consistency headaches with a different pledge of stock deal. It's actually pretty slick - caught several name variations I hadn't noticed between my loan agreement and UCC filing. Definitely worth trying for complex collateral situations like this.

Indiana Article 9 filings require exact name matching but their rejection notices are terrible at explaining what's wrong. I'd suggest calling their UCC hotline first thing in the morning - they're usually most helpful early in the day before they get swamped with calls.

Following this thread because I'm about to file a UCC-1 in Indiana next week. Hoping I don't run into the same name matching issues. Sounds like their system is pretty finicky about exact formatting.