


Ask the community...
UPDATE: I filed the correct UCC-1 this morning and it's already been accepted. Ran a UCC search and thankfully no competing liens were filed during my gap period. Still working with legal on the loan covenant issue but feeling much better about the secured position now. Thanks everyone for the quick responses and clarification on the terminology.
I'm leaving the amendment on record for now. My attorney said it's harmless since it references a non-existent financing statement, and filing a termination might just add more confusion to the record.
Smart approach. Sometimes the best solution is just moving forward with the correct filing rather than trying to clean up every administrative artifact.
For anyone else who might make a similar mistake: most electronic filing systems now have confirmation screens that show exactly what type of filing you're submitting before you hit final submit. Always read that confirmation screen carefully. I know it seems obvious but when you're rushing through filings it's easy to miss.
This is so true. I've seen people blow past those confirmation screens and file amendments when they meant to file initial statements, or terminations when they meant to file continuations. Slow down and read the screen.
I remember being confused about UCC liens when I first started my business. Now I have several and they're all just routine secured loan paperwork. You'll get used to seeing them as your business grows.
One more thought - you might want to run a UCC search on your business periodically just to keep tabs on what's out there. Sometimes there are old filings that should have been terminated but weren't.
Indiana Article 9 filings require exact name matching but their rejection notices are terrible at explaining what's wrong. I'd suggest calling their UCC hotline first thing in the morning - they're usually most helpful early in the day before they get swamped with calls.
The main Secretary of State number can transfer you to the UCC division. Sometimes you can get through directly if you ask for Business Services first.
Perfect, I'll try that approach tomorrow morning. Thanks for all the help everyone!
Following this thread because I'm about to file a UCC-1 in Indiana next week. Hoping I don't run into the same name matching issues. Sounds like their system is pretty finicky about exact formatting.
Just be extra careful with punctuation and capitalization. Pull a fresh Certificate of Good Standing right before filing.
Will do. Might also check out that Certana thing people mentioned to double-check everything before submitting.
Another option is to check if your state allows "all assets" or "all personal property" as collateral descriptions. Some states accept that language, others require more specificity. Delaware tends to want more detail though.
I tried "all personal property" initially and that got rejected too. Seems like Delaware wants specific categories listed.
Update on the Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier - I've used it on three different UCC filings now and it's caught issues every time. Really good at comparing your commercial security agreement definition against your UCC collateral schedule to make sure there are no gaps or inconsistencies. Worth trying before you submit the amended filing.
Anything that helps avoid more rejections sounds good to me. This process is stressful enough without multiple rounds of corrections.
Mateo Sanchez
This thread is making me feel so much better! I've been worried about similar issues with my Oklahoma filings. Sounds like it's just the system being 'helpful' with formatting rather than actual filing problems.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Yeah, Oklahoma definitely takes some liberties with how they display information. The underlying filings are solid though - it's just their search interface that makes things look different.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
Bottom line: if Oklahoma accepted your UCC-1 and issued a filing number, your security interest is perfected regardless of how the search results display the debtor name. The variations you're seeing are almost certainly just cosmetic formatting by their system. Keep your original filing confirmations and you'll be fine if anyone ever questions the perfection.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•This is the most reassuring answer in the thread. Sometimes we overthink these things when the basics are actually working fine.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Agreed, this thread has been super helpful. Going to order those certified copies just to have them on file, but feeling much more confident about the perfection status now.
0 coins