UCC 103 108 filing rejection - debtor name variance issue
Got a UCC filing rejected yesterday with codes 103 and 108. The debtor name on our UCC-1 was listed as 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but apparently the state records show 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with that comma. Our loan department is freaking out because we're 3 days from the 20-day grace period expiring and they're saying this could void our security interest. Has anyone dealt with these specific rejection codes before? The SOS portal isn't giving me much detail on what exactly needs to be corrected. This is a $2.8M equipment financing deal and I'm worried we're going to lose our perfected status over punctuation.
43 comments


Miguel Hernández
UCC 103 usually means there's a discrepancy with the debtor name format. 108 could be related to missing or incorrect organizational ID number. Check your state's exact entity name in their business entity database - even commas and periods matter for perfection.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Thanks, I pulled the state entity records and you're right about the comma. Do I need to file a whole new UCC-1 or can I do a UCC-3 amendment to correct this?
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•For name corrections, you'll need a UCC-3 amendment. But honestly, with only days left in your grace period, I'd file both a corrected UCC-1 AND the amendment just to be safe.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
I had the exact same issue last month with a Texas filing. The rejection codes were different but same problem - missing comma in the LLC name. What state are you filing in? Some states are more strict about exact name matches than others.
0 coins
KylieRose
•This is in Ohio. Their system seems pretty rigid about exact matches.
0 coins
Liam Murphy
•Ohio is definitely strict. I learned that the hard way on a continuation filing that got rejected for a similar name issue.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•Yeah Ohio doesn't mess around. Make sure your amendment references the original filing number correctly too.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
Before you refile anything, try using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your original UCC-1 and the state entity documents, and it'll instantly flag name discrepancies and other issues. I wish I'd known about it before my last filing disaster - would have saved me weeks of back and forth with rejections.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Never heard of that tool before. How does it work exactly?
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•You just upload PDFs of your filing documents and it cross-checks everything automatically - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions. Shows you exactly what doesn't match before you submit to the state.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
•That actually sounds really useful. Beats manually comparing documents line by line.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
UGH these rejection codes are so frustrating!!! I spent 6 hours last week trying to figure out why my continuation got bounced. Turned out to be a single character difference in the debtor name that I couldn't even see. The SOS systems are so picky but they never tell you exactly what's wrong.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•I feel your pain. The lack of detailed error messages makes troubleshooting these rejections way harder than it needs to be.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Exactly! Like just TELL ME what's wrong instead of making me guess with cryptic codes.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
Check if your organizational ID number matches too. Code 108 might be related to that. I've seen filings get rejected because the EIN was formatted with dashes when the state system expected it without, or vice versa.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Good point, I'll double check the EIN formatting. The original filing had it as XX-XXXXXXX format.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
•Try it without the dashes. Some states are particular about that formatting.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
•Ohio usually wants EINs without dashes in my experience.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
Wait, you said you're 3 days from the grace period expiring? Are you sure about that timeline? Most states give you more time to correct rejected filings, especially if it's just a clerical error.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Our loan docs specify a 20-day perfection requirement from the loan closing date. We filed on day 17 and got rejected on day 19.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
•Ah I see, that's your loan agreement deadline, not the state's correction period. Yeah you need to move fast then.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•In that case definitely file both the corrected UCC-1 and a UCC-3 amendment today if possible.
0 coins
LilMama23
This is why I always verify entity names against the secretary of state database before filing anything. One character off and you're looking at rejection and potential loss of priority.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Easy to say but when you're dealing with hundreds of filings it's hard to catch every little detail.
0 coins
LilMama23
•True, but on a $2.8M deal like this one, it's worth the extra verification step.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
I use Certana.ai's UCC checker for all my filings now after getting burned by a similar name mismatch issue. Upload your UCC documents and it automatically flags inconsistencies before you submit to the state. Saved me probably 10+ rejections this year.
0 coins
KylieRose
•How accurate is it? Does it catch formatting issues like the comma thing I'm dealing with?
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
•Yeah it caught a missing comma in an LLC name for me last month. Also flagged EIN format issues and collateral description mismatches.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•The tool is pretty thorough. I've had it catch things I would never have noticed manually.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
File the corrected UCC-1 TODAY. Don't wait. You can always file the amendment later but you need that corrected filing in the system ASAP to protect your lien position.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Already working on it. Making sure the debtor name exactly matches the state records this time, comma and all.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
•Good. And double check the collateral description while you're at it. Sometimes they reject for multiple issues but only tell you about one.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
Had this happen on a real estate transaction where the borrower was an LLC. Turns out the entity had been administratively dissolved and reinstated, which changed some filing requirements. Might want to check the entity status too.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Entity shows as active and in good standing, so that shouldn't be the issue here.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Good, that eliminates one potential complication.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
•Dissolved entities can definitely complicate UCC filings. Always worth checking status.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
Update us when you get it resolved! These rejection code issues are so common but there's not enough information shared about specific solutions.
0 coins
KylieRose
•Will do. Filing the corrected UCC-1 this afternoon and crossing my fingers it goes through clean this time.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•Hope it works out. The stress of these deadline filings is real.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•Definitely update the thread - these types of posts help everyone learn from each other's experiences.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
This thread convinced me to try that Certana tool mentioned earlier. Just uploaded some docs to test it out and it immediately flagged a debtor name inconsistency I hadn't noticed. Could have saved me from a rejection.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
•That's exactly why I started using it. The manual document comparison process is just too error-prone when you're under deadline pressure.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
•Yeah the automated cross-checking is way more reliable than trying to spot these tiny differences by eye.
0 coins