< Back to UCC Document Community

Scarlett Forster

UCC-1038 form rejection - debtor name formatting issues

Got a UCC-1038 rejection notice yesterday and I'm completely lost. Filed what I thought was a straightforward continuation but the SOS kicked it back citing "debtor name inconsistency with original filing." The original UCC-1 from 2020 has the debtor as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but our loan docs show "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma). I used the exact name from our credit agreement when I filed the UCC-1038 continuation. Now I'm 3 months from the 5-year lapse date and panicking. Has anyone dealt with this specific formatting issue? The original filing number is valid and I triple-checked it. Is this really going to void a $2.8M secured position over punctuation?

Arnav Bengali

•

This is actually more common than you'd think. The SOS systems are incredibly picky about exact debtor name matches between the original UCC-1 and any amendments or continuations. Even something as small as a comma can trigger a rejection. You need to file the UCC-1038 using the EXACT debtor name from the original 2020 filing, not from your loan documents. Pull up the original UCC-1 filing and copy that name character for character.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Wait, so the loan documents don't matter for the continuation? That seems backwards - shouldn't we be using the current legal name?

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

For continuation purposes, you're extending the original filing exactly as it was recorded. If the legal name actually changed, that would require a UCC-3 amendment first, then the continuation. But if it's just formatting differences in your loan docs, stick with the original filing name.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

I had this exact same problem last year! Filed a continuation with the debtor name formatted slightly different from the original UCC-1 and got rejected twice. The frustrating part is manually comparing documents to catch these tiny discrepancies. I ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you just upload your original UCC-1 and the new UCC-1038 as PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies. Saved me from filing a third incorrect continuation.

0 coins

That sounds helpful - I've been doing everything manually and obviously missing things. Does it catch other issues too or just name matching?

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

It checks debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, basically all the critical fields that need to match between documents. Really useful for avoiding these rejection headaches.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

Never heard of that tool but anything that prevents UCC rejections sounds worth trying

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Been filing UCCs for 15 years and punctuation issues are the bane of my existence. Here's what you need to do: 1) Access the original UCC-1 filing from 2020 through the SOS database, 2) Copy the debtor name EXACTLY as it appears, including all spacing and punctuation, 3) File a corrected UCC-1038 with that exact name format. The comma difference between "ABC Manufacturing LLC" and "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" will definitely cause rejections in most states' systems.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

This is so stressful!!! What if I mess up the correction too? Is there a limit on how many times you can refile a continuation?

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Most states don't have limits on refiling, but time is your enemy here. Each rejection and refiling cycle eats into your window before the original UCC-1 lapses. Get it right the second time.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

The SOS systems are absolutely ridiculous about this stuff. I've seen million-dollar secured positions get voided because someone added a period after "Inc" when the original didn't have one. It's bureaucratic nonsense but you have to play by their rules.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

totally agree the system is broken but what choice do we have

0 coins

It's frustrating but there's good reason for exact matching - prevents fraudulent filings and ensures the public record is clear about which entity is actually the debtor.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

Check if your state offers a UCC search portal where you can verify the exact formatting before refiling. Some states show the debtor name exactly as it was entered in the original filing, which takes the guesswork out of the formatting.

0 coins

Good idea - I'll check our state's portal. Should have done that before the first filing attempt.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

Most states have this but the search interfaces vary wildly in quality

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

I just went through something similar with a UCC-3 amendment. The original filing had "Jones & Associates" but I filed the amendment as "Jones and Associates" (spelled out 'and' instead of '&'). Rejected immediately. Had to refile with the exact ampersand symbol. These systems are unforgiving.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Perfect example of why character-for-character matching is crucial. The ampersand vs 'and' issue trips up a lot of people.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

How are we supposed to know all these tiny formatting rules? There should be better guidance!

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

3 months is cutting it close but you should be fine if you get the corrected UCC-1038 filed within the next few weeks. The 5-year continuation window typically gives you some buffer, but don't wait until the last month. Also make sure your filing fee is correct - sometimes rejections happen for multiple reasons.

0 coins

Good point about the filing fee - I'll double-check that too. The rejection notice only mentioned the debtor name issue but there could be other problems.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Always check fees - they change periodically and using old fee schedules will get you rejected even if everything else is perfect

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

Had a client lose their security interest because of a similar issue. They kept refiling with the wrong debtor name format and ran out of time before the original UCC-1 lapsed. Don't let that happen to you - get the exact name from the public record and file immediately.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

That's a nightmare scenario. How much was the loan that got voided?

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

Over $5M secured position became unsecured. Devastating for the lender and a malpractice nightmare.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

OMG this is exactly what I'm afraid of happening!!!

0 coins

Another option is to use one of those document verification services before filing. I recently discovered Certana.ai which lets you upload your UCC documents as PDFs and it automatically checks for consistency issues like name mismatches. Would have saved you the rejection and stress.

0 coins

Two people have mentioned that service now - seems like it might be worth trying for the corrected filing.

0 coins

Yeah I've heard good things about automated document checking for UCC work. Beats manually comparing everything.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

Just to confirm what others said - you absolutely must use the debtor name exactly as it appears on the original 2020 UCC-1 filing. No variations, no 'corrections' to match current documents, no formatting improvements. The continuation is tied to that specific original filing and must reference the debtor identically. Pull the original filing, copy the name precisely, and refile ASAP.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - consensus seems clear. I'll pull the original filing today and get the corrected UCC-1038 submitted this week with the exact original debtor name formatting.

0 coins

Smart move. Better to file quickly with confidence than to keep second-guessing and risk running out of time.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Exactly right. Time is critical now. Get it filed correctly and you'll be fine.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today