UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Yara Nassar

Solar UCC subordination agreement timing - equipment lender won't budge

We're trying to close on a commercial solar installation but hit a major snag with UCC subordination. The equipment financing company filed their UCC-1 first (covering all solar panels and inverters) but now our construction lender is demanding they subordinate their security interest before we can proceed. The solar equipment lender is refusing to subordinate, saying their lien position is non-negotiable since they're financing $2.8M in specialized equipment. Has anyone dealt with solar UCC subordination disputes? The property owner is caught in the middle and threatening to walk from the whole deal. We've got permits pulled and installation scheduled to start next month but can't move forward without resolving this lien priority issue.

For future reference, it's worth addressing UCC subordination early in the deal structure phase rather than waiting until closing. Solar projects have enough moving parts without adding last-minute lien priority disputes.

0 coins

Good practice is to have all lenders review each other's collateral descriptions before filing UCC-1s. Prevents these conflicts from arising in the first place.

0 coins

That's why I always run the Charter→UCC-1 verification through Certana before finalizing any commercial energy deal. Catches these issues before they become deal-breakers.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing the resolution. Solar UCC subordination cases like this help establish precedents for how to handle collateral splits in renewable energy projects. The industry needs more documented solutions like yours.

0 coins

Happy to help others avoid the same headaches. Solar financing is complex enough without UCC surprises derailing deals at the last minute.

0 coins

This thread should be required reading for anyone structuring solar project financing. Great practical advice from everyone.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

Need help with Nevada UCC search - debtor name variations showing conflicting results

I'm pulling my hair out trying to run a comprehensive Nevada UCC search for a commercial loan we're closing next week. The debtor operates under several business variations and I'm getting completely different results depending on how I search the name. When I search "Mountain View Equipment LLC" I get 3 active filings, but searching "Mountainview Equipment LLC" (no space) shows 2 different filings, and "Mountain View Equipment, LLC" (with comma) pulls up nothing at all. This is for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and I cannot afford to miss any existing liens. The SOS Nevada portal seems really finicky about exact name matching and I'm worried I'm missing critical filings that could torpedo this deal. Has anyone else dealt with Nevada's UCC search being this sensitive to minor name variations? I need to be 100% certain I've found every possible filing before we fund.

Try searching with the federal EIN number if you have it. Sometimes Nevada filings include the tax ID and you can catch filings that way even if the name search misses them.

0 coins

Wait, Nevada allows EIN searches? I thought only a few states supported that.

0 coins

Not directly, but the EIN sometimes shows up in the debtor additional info field and you can search that way. Hit or miss but worth trying.

0 coins

Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it found 2 additional filings I completely missed with manual searches. One was filed under "Mt View Equipment LLC" (abbreviated) and another under the owner's personal name as additional debtor. Both would have been senior to our filing. Tool paid for itself immediately.

0 coins

Much less than I expected and definitely worth it for the comprehensive coverage. The automated cross-checking caught variations I would never have thought to search manually.

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear. Going to try the Certana verification - can't risk missing any liens on a deal this size.

0 coins

Salim Nasir

Wyoming UCC filing rejected - debtor name mismatch issue

Has anyone dealt with Wyoming UCC-1 filings getting rejected for debtor name issues? I submitted a continuation last week and it got bounced back with a rejection notice saying the debtor name doesn't match their records. The original UCC-1 was filed 3 years ago and I'm using the exact same business name from our loan documents. Wyoming's online portal shows the original filing but when I compare the names character by character, I can't spot any difference. This is for a equipment financing deal and the lien is set to lapse in 45 days if I can't get this continuation through. Anyone know what Wyoming's specific requirements are for debtor name matching? Their rejection notice wasn't very helpful - just said 'debtor name does not match filing records' with no details about what's wrong.

Wyoming rejected my UCC-1 termination last month for a similar name issue. Turned out the problem was that the original filing had 'Co.' and I was using 'Company' on the termination. These state systems are so picky about abbreviations too.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of detail that's easy to miss. I'll be extra careful about any abbreviations in the business name.

0 coins

Abbreviations are the worst! Every state seems to handle them differently too.

0 coins

Update us when you get it resolved! I'm curious what the actual issue turns out to be. These Wyoming name matching problems seem to be getting more common lately.

0 coins

Good luck! Dealing with UCC rejections is never fun, especially with tight deadlines.

0 coins

Hope you get it sorted out quickly. Keep us posted on what works!

0 coins

Hassan Khoury

PA corporation search UCC - debtor name verification nightmare

Been dealing with a massive headache trying to perfect our security interest on equipment financed through a regional bank. The debtor is incorporated in PA and we need to file UCC-1 but I'm running into issues with the exact corporate name format. Did a PA corporation search and found three slightly different variations of the company name in their records - one has 'Inc.' another shows 'Incorporated' and a third entry drops the comma before Inc. Our loan docs show it one way but the PA SOS database shows it differently. Bank is breathing down my neck because we're approaching our 20-day perfection window and they're worried about priority issues if we get the debtor name wrong. Has anyone dealt with PA corporation search discrepancies when preparing UCC filings? I'm seeing conflicting info about whether to use the exact charter name or if there's flexibility with abbreviations. Really don't want to get a rejection notice and have to start over with amended filings.

The good news is that PA allows electronic UCC filing, so once you confirm the correct debtor name format, you can file immediately. Just make sure your collateral description is also accurate - PA has been rejecting filings for vague collateral schedules too.

0 coins

Thanks for the reminder about collateral descriptions. This is equipment financing so I should be specific about the machinery being financed.

0 coins

Exactly. PA wants specific descriptions for equipment - make, model, serial numbers if you have them. Generic 'equipment' descriptions often get rejected.

0 coins

Update us on how this resolves! PA corporation name issues for UCC filings seem to come up frequently in this forum. Would be helpful to know which approach works best for getting accurate debtor names quickly.

0 coins

Will definitely update once I get this sorted out. Leaning toward getting certified Articles plus using one of those document verification tools mentioned here to double-check everything before filing.

0 coins

Good plan. PA UCC rejections are such a pain to deal with, especially with tight deadlines.

0 coins

Isla Fischer

UCC code requirements causing filing headaches - need clarification

Been dealing with some UCC filing complications and wondering if anyone has solid experience with the specific code requirements. Working on a equipment financing deal where the debtor entity underwent a name change mid-transaction, and now I'm second-guessing whether our UCC-1 filing properly reflects the correct legal entity name according to the UCC code provisions. The collateral schedule covers manufacturing equipment valued around $485,000, and we're about 8 months into the initial filing period. Our compliance officer is concerned that if the debtor name doesn't exactly match the charter documents under UCC code standards, we could have perfection issues that void our security interest entirely. Has anyone dealt with similar name-matching requirements under UCC code when the business entity changes names after the original loan documents but before filing? The secretary of state portal accepted our filing initially, but that doesn't guarantee we're actually perfected if there's a code violation we missed.

Quick question - does UCC code require the debtor name to include things like 'LLC' or can you just use the business name without the entity designation?

0 coins

You need the complete legal name including entity designation. So if it's 'ABC Company LLC' on the charter, that's what goes on the UCC-1. UCC code doesn't allow shortcuts or abbreviations.

0 coins

Got it, thanks. I've been doing it right then, but wasn't 100% sure about the UCC code requirements.

0 coins

Update for everyone following this - I got the certified articles and confirmed our UCC-1 debtor name matches exactly. Also ran the docs through that Certana tool someone mentioned and it verified everything looks good for UCC code compliance. Thanks for all the guidance, definitely learned a lot about proper name verification procedures!

0 coins

Awesome that Certana worked well for you too. It's such a relief to get automated verification of UCC code compliance instead of just hoping you got it right.

0 coins

Perfect outcome. Your compliance officer should be happy that you took the initiative to verify everything properly.

0 coins

Prev1...325326327328329...684Next