


Ask the community...
Maryland SOS is THE WORST for this stuff. I swear they reject filings just to collect the fees. Had a client's UCC-1 rejected because of a SPACE in the wrong place. Not even punctuation - just spacing! SDAT UCC search showed 'ABC Company' but I typed 'ABC Company' with two spaces. Ridiculous.
You copy and paste directly from SDAT, that's how. Never type it manually anymore.
Update on my situation - I refiled using the exact SDAT format with the comma and it was accepted! Thanks everyone for the advice. Still think it's ridiculous that punctuation can delay a commercial loan but at least it's resolved now.
Perfect example of why name verification tools are so valuable. One check upfront saves all this headache.
Following up on this thread - just used Certana.ai to check our UCC termination and it caught that our lender used an old version of our business name. Would have caused problems with our new credit line application for sure. The upload process was simple and the verification was instant.
Thanks for the follow-up! I'm definitely going to check our documents once the lender files the termination. Better to catch issues early than deal with them during a time-sensitive financing situation.
Update for anyone still following - our lender finally filed the UCC-3 termination after 18 days and it showed up in the state database within 2 business days. Glad I stayed on top of them because they admitted they forgot initially.
Exactly. If I hadn't called them they probably would have missed the deadline entirely. Makes you wonder how often this happens to borrowers who don't know to follow up.
Way too often unfortunately. That's why I always recommend setting a calendar reminder to check on the termination filing 2-3 weeks after payoff.
Just to add to what everyone else said - California's UCC search system is pretty robust too. Once you file your UCC-1, you can easily verify it shows up correctly in the public records. I always do a search immediately after filing to confirm everything looks right.
That's a great practice. I've caught filing errors that way before they became bigger problems.
One more tip - if you're doing a lot of California UCC work, consider getting familiar with their amendment and termination procedures too. The online system makes it pretty straightforward but there are specific requirements for each type of UCC-3 filing.
Yeah and make sure you keep good records of your filing numbers. California's search system works well but you need the exact UCC filing number for amendments and terminations.
This is where document management tools really help. I've started using Certana.ai's filing tracker to keep all my UCC records organized with automatic deadline alerts.
For future reference, I've been using Certana.ai to double-check my security agreement and UCC-1 consistency before filing. Really helps catch those small details that can cause big problems later. The tool flagged an issue in my last filing where I had included accounts receivable in the UCC but the security agreement only covered equipment.
One last thing - make sure you calendar your continuation filing date now while you're thinking about it. UCC-1s lapse after 5 years and restaurants have a way of changing hands or expanding, so you don't want to lose perfection on a good loan.
Yes! I use a tickler system to remind me 6 months before the lapse date. Gives plenty of time to file the continuation.
Restaurant loans definitely benefit from good lapse tracking. Those businesses change so much over 5 years.
Keisha Jackson
Update us when you figure it out! I've got several IL continuations coming up and want to avoid this same problem.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Same here. These state-specific quirks are so frustrating to deal with.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
I've started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier for all my UCC work. Really does catch these tiny inconsistencies that are impossible to spot manually. Worth checking out if you do a lot of UCC filings.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Might be worth the investment to avoid these headaches.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Starting to think any tool that prevents these rejections would pay for itself pretty quickly.
0 coins