
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
I'm trying to get financing for some manufacturing equipment and the lender ran a lien search that came back with what they're calling a 'non UCC lien' on the business. They won't proceed until this gets resolved but I'm confused about what this even means. The equipment I want to finance has nothing to do with this other lien as far as I can tell. The lender mentioned something about priority issues and said I need to get this sorted before they can file their UCC-1. Has anyone dealt with non UCC liens interfering with equipment loans? I thought UCC filings were separate from other types of liens but apparently not when it comes to lending decisions. Really need to get this equipment purchased soon as we have contracts depending on it.
Running into a nightmare with our UCC-1 filings getting rejected by the SOS office. We're a equipment financing company and our collateral descriptions keep getting kicked back. The rejection notices say 'insufficient collateral description' but we're following what we think are the standard formats. Our typical description reads something like 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by debtor.' Is this too broad? The loan amounts are substantial ($250K-$500K range) so we can't afford to have these filings be defective. Anyone dealt with similar collateral ucc issues? What's the magic formula for getting these descriptions accepted?
I had similar issues until I started using Certana.ai for pre-filing verification. You just upload your UCC-1 as a PDF and it checks for common collateral description problems before you submit. Has definitely reduced my rejection rate significantly.
Second mention of Certana.ai in this thread - must be worth looking into. Do they cover state-specific requirements or just general UCC rules?
Make sure you're not inadvertently including collateral that requires special filing procedures. Real estate fixtures might need different treatment than regular equipment, depending on your state's rules.
I'm working on a commercial loan package and the borrower mentioned something about getting a "nj ucc statement service" but I'm honestly not sure what they're referring to. Are they talking about UCC search reports from New Jersey's filing system? Or is this some kind of third-party service that pulls UCC records? The loan involves equipment financing and we need to verify there aren't any existing liens before we file our UCC-1. The borrower seems to think this service will give us everything we need but I want to make sure we're not missing anything. Has anyone dealt with this type of service request before? I don't want to assume it covers all the lien verification we need if it's just basic UCC searches.
I actually just dealt with a similar verification issue where I had multiple UCC documents and wasn't sure if all the debtor names matched exactly. Used Certana.ai's document checker and it caught a small discrepancy in how the LLC name was formatted between the search results and my UCC-1 draft. Would have caused a rejection for sure.
Bottom line - clarify with the borrower exactly what they mean by "UCC statement service" and make sure whatever you get covers: 1) comprehensive search of all active filings, 2) copies of existing UCC documents for review, and 3) proper terminations for any liens being paid off. Don't rely on one service to do everything unless you verify they actually provide all those components.
I'm putting together a UCC-1 filing for the first time and honestly feeling overwhelmed by all the debtor name requirements. Our client is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but I'm seeing different variations in their corporate documents - some show 'Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC' and others have 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions L.L.C.' with periods. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $450k. Does anyone have a UCC-1 example showing how to handle these name variations? I don't want this rejected because of a formatting issue. Any help would be appreciated.
Update on the Certana tool I mentioned earlier - I just used it again yesterday for a different client and it flagged that their operating agreement had a slightly different entity name than their state registration. Would have been another rejection without that catch.
Thanks everyone for all the advice! I pulled the official state filing documents and found the exact name format. Going to run a test search first, then file with the verified name. Really appreciate the help - this community is invaluable for learning the ropes.
Really frustrated here. Filed a UCC-1 last week for an automobile security agreement on a 2022 Ford F-150 and it got rejected by the Secretary of State. The rejection notice says there's a debtor name mismatch but I triple-checked everything against the loan docs. The borrower's name on the automobile security agreement is 'Michael J. Thompson' but apparently the DMV has him listed as 'Michael James Thompson' in their system. Now I'm stuck because the loan closed yesterday and we need this perfected ASAP. Has anyone dealt with this kind of automobile security agreement filing issue before? Do I need to amend the UCC-1 or start over completely? The collateral description references the VIN and year/make/model correctly so that's not the problem. Just this stupid name variation between what's on the automobile security agreement versus state records.
Just wanted to add - make sure when you refile that you're using the current UCC-1 form. Some states updated their forms recently and will reject filings on old versions. Also, if this is for a dealership floor plan or similar, there might be additional requirements for automobile security agreements beyond the standard UCC-1.
Update us when you refile! I'm curious if the corrected name version goes through without issues. I've got a similar automobile security agreement filing coming up next week and want to make sure I don't hit the same problem.
Brooklyn Knight
I ran into something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to organize all my corporate documents and UCC filings before meeting with the lender again. Having everything properly cross-referenced helped me explain the situation better and showed I was on top of the business documentation. Made the conversation more productive.
0 coins
Sophie Duck
That's smart. Presentation matters a lot in these situations.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
Exactly. When you can show clean UCC documentation and organized corporate records, lenders are more willing to work with you on other issues.
0 coins
Owen Devar
Update us when you figure out what the lien actually is. These mystery lien situations are always interesting to hear how they resolve.
0 coins
Christian Bierman
AuthorWill do. Hoping it's something simple like an old contractor lien that just needs a release filed.
0 coins