


Ask the community...
Original poster - just to add to what others have said, make sure you coordinate with your title company if this property has a mortgage. They'll want to know about any fixture filings that might affect the real estate collateral. Also consider whether you need to notify the existing mortgagee depending on your intercreditor arrangements.
Good point about the mortgage coordination. This property does have an existing mortgage so I'll need to check our intercreditor agreement about fixture filing requirements.
Definitely coordinate early. Some mortgagees want approval rights over fixture filings that could affect their collateral position.
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses. I think I have a much better understanding of how to approach the UCC definition of assets for this filing. The fixture filing requirement was something I definitely would have missed without this discussion. Going to draft the description using the broader categories approach with specific examples, and make sure to coordinate with the existing mortgagee before filing.
Glad this thread was helpful! These asset definition questions come up a lot and it's always good to see the community sharing practical experience.
Just remember to double-check everything before filing. A lot of these issues can be avoided with careful review of the docs beforehand.
Another option is to check if your state allows "all assets" or "all personal property" as collateral descriptions. Some states accept that language, others require more specificity. Delaware tends to want more detail though.
I tried "all personal property" initially and that got rejected too. Seems like Delaware wants specific categories listed.
Update on the Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier - I've used it on three different UCC filings now and it's caught issues every time. Really good at comparing your commercial security agreement definition against your UCC collateral schedule to make sure there are no gaps or inconsistencies. Worth trying before you submit the amended filing.
Anything that helps avoid more rejections sounds good to me. This process is stressful enough without multiple rounds of corrections.
One more thing - if your underwriter is really concerned about the messy search results, you could always have the borrower's attorney provide a legal opinion letter stating that all terminated liens have been properly released and don't affect the current transaction. Might be overkill but some lenders require it for complex filing histories.
That might be worth considering if we run into more pushback. Thanks for the suggestion.
Attorney opinion letters definitely carry weight with nervous underwriters. Good fallback option.
Quick follow-up question - when you say the debtor names are spelled exactly the same, are you including the full legal entity name with suffixes like LLC or Corporation? Sometimes the formatting differences aren't obvious but can still affect search results.
Debtor name consistency is huge. I've seen searches where slight variations created separate entries and made everything confusing.
The debtor's loan payoff claims don't mean much without UCC-3 terminations on file. I've had borrowers show me bank statements 'proving' they paid off loans, but if there's no termination filed, that lien is still perfected against your collateral. Always verify through the public record, not debtor representations.
This! Learned this lesson the hard way when a 'paid off' lien turned out to still be active and we ended up in second position.
Exactly. The UCC filing is public notice of the lien. Until it's properly terminated, it's still valid regardless of what the debtor claims.
Update: Contacted all four secured parties. Two confirmed loans were paid off but never filed terminations (they're filing UCC-3s this week). One lapsed in 2024 with no continuation. Last one is still active with a 2023 continuation. Thanks for all the advice - this thread saved me from making some big mistakes on lien priority.
Good outcome. Always better to do the legwork upfront than deal with priority disputes later.
Wait, so you're saying some of those liens were actually dead but still showing as active in the search? That's terrifying.
Mateusius Townsend
Whatever you do, make sure you're searching under all possible debtor names including any DBAs or trade names. I've seen UCC filings under names that weren't obvious from the main corporate records.
0 coins
Summer Green
•DBA searches are crucial. Sometimes the UCC-1 gets filed under the trade name instead of the legal entity name.
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
•This is why I always request a complete list of all business names from the borrower upfront. Saves time later.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
The bottom line is you can't rely on just one search. Use multiple services, check the state databases directly when possible, and verify the status of any filings you find. It's extra work but it protects your lender's security interest.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•Definitely look into some of the automated tools to help streamline the verification process. Makes the multi-source approach much more manageable.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
•Smart approach. Better to over-search than under-search when it comes to UCC and lien verification.
0 coins