UCC-1 Filing After Security Agreement Notarized - Documentation Requirements
Quick question for anyone who's dealt with this before. We had our security agreement notarized last week for a $175,000 equipment loan, and now I'm preparing the UCC-1 filing. The debtor's business name on the notarized security agreement shows "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but their state charter shows "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma). I know debtor name accuracy is critical for UCC-1 filings, but I'm not sure if the notarized security agreement creates any additional requirements or constraints for how the debtor name should appear on the UCC filing. Should I match the security agreement exactly since it's notarized, or should I follow the exact charter name for the UCC-1? Don't want to risk a rejection or worse, an unperfected security interest because of punctuation. Anyone run into this situation with notarized security agreements and UCC filings?
34 comments
Join the conversation
Raj Gupta
Always go with the charter name for UCC-1 filings, regardless of what's on the security agreement. The filing office doesn't care about your security agreement - they only verify against the debtor's official state records. I've seen too many rejections from people trying to match loan documents instead of the actual charter.
0 coins
Lena Müller
•This is correct. The UCC filing system automatically rejects filings that don't match the exact charter name format.
0 coins
TechNinja
•Wait, but what if the notarized agreement creates legal obligations to match it exactly? I'm dealing with something similar and my attorney mentioned potential issues.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
I had this exact problem 6 months ago with a notarized security agreement that had the wrong debtor name format. Filed the UCC-1 with the charter name (ABC Manufacturing, LLC with comma) even though the security agreement showed it without the comma. Filing was accepted and perfected properly. The notarization doesn't override UCC filing requirements.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
•Good to hear a success story. Did you have to amend the security agreement later or just leave it as-is?
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
•Left the security agreement as-is. The UCC filing is what matters for perfection, not the underlying agreement's formatting.
0 coins
Yara Assad
•That makes sense but I'm still nervous about document inconsistencies. How do you verify everything aligns properly?
0 coins
Olivia Clark
Actually had this problem bite me last year. Used a document verification tool called Certana.ai that instantly cross-checks debtor names between your security agreement and UCC-1 by uploading both PDFs. It caught the name mismatch immediately and showed me exactly how to format the debtor name for the filing. Saved me from a potential rejection and the headache of figuring out the discrepancy manually.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How does it handle punctuation differences like commas and periods?
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•It flags any differences between documents and shows you the charter-compliant format for UCC filings. Really straightforward - just upload your PDFs and it does the comparison work.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
The notarized security agreement doesn't change UCC filing rules AT ALL. I see this confusion constantly. Your UCC-1 debtor name must match the charter exactly - period. The security agreement could say "Mickey Mouse Enterprises" and you'd still file the UCC-1 with the actual charter name.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Appreciate the clarity. So the notarization is just for the security agreement validity, not UCC requirements?
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
•Exactly. Notarization affects contract enforceability, not secured transaction perfection rules.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•This explains why my lawyer was less concerned about the name difference than I was. Thanks for breaking it down.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
Been filing UCCs for 15 years and this comes up regularly. Document the name discrepancy in your loan file notes, but file the UCC-1 with the charter name. Most lenders have internal procedures for handling these situations - check if your institution has specific protocols.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•Good advice about documenting the discrepancy. Creates a clean audit trail.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•My bank requires a memo explaining any name differences between the security agreement and UCC filing. Standard practice now.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
Just went through this exact scenario last month. Security agreement was notarized with "XYZ Corp" but charter showed "XYZ Corporation". Filed UCC-1 with "XYZ Corporation" and it was accepted without issues. The key is UCC filing accuracy, not security agreement consistency.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•That's reassuring. Did you have any issues with the borrower questioning the name difference?
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•Borrower didn't even notice. Most don't understand UCC filing requirements anyway.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
OMG this is giving me anxiety. I have the same situation but with a $300K loan and I'm terrified of messing up the UCC filing. What if the notarized agreement legally binds us to use that exact name format? What if there are enforcement issues later??
0 coins
Leila Haddad
•Take a deep breath. The UCC filing protects your security interest, which is separate from contract enforcement. File with the charter name.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•I was just as worried but it worked out fine. The filing system only cares about matching official state records.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•Consider using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier to double-check everything before filing. Might give you peace of mind.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
Another vote for filing with the charter name. I've handled hundreds of these situations and never had an issue when following charter formatting for UCC-1 filings, regardless of security agreement variations.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•Hundreds? That's impressive experience. Any other common naming pitfalls to watch for?
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Watch for "Inc." vs "Incorporated" and "LLC" vs "Limited Liability Company". Always match the exact charter format.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Had to deal with this recently and ended up using Certana.ai's document checker to verify consistency between my security agreement and UCC-1. Uploaded both PDFs and it immediately flagged the name formatting issue, showing me the correct charter format to use. Really saved me time compared to manually cross-referencing everything.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with different document types or just UCC filings?
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Works with various document combinations - security agreements, UCC-1s, UCC-3s, charter documents. Pretty comprehensive for secured transaction verification.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
Bottom line: file your UCC-1 with "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (the charter name with comma). The notarized security agreement doesn't override UCC Article 9 perfection requirements. Document the discrepancy in your loan file and move forward with confidence.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
•Perfect summary. This thread convinced me to stick with the charter name format.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•Agreed. Sometimes we overthink these situations when the rules are actually pretty straightforward.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•Thanks everyone for the clarity. Filing with the charter name format today. Really appreciate all the real-world experience shared here.
0 coins