< Back to UCC Document Community

KaiEsmeralda

UCC-1 filing rejected - security interest agreement collateral description issues

Our UCC-1 filing got rejected yesterday and I'm trying to figure out what went wrong with our security interest agreement collateral description. We're securing a $485,000 equipment loan for medical devices and the SOS portal kicked it back saying 'insufficient collateral description.' The security interest agreement lists specific model numbers and serial numbers for 12 pieces of diagnostic equipment, but our UCC-1 just said 'medical equipment and all proceeds thereof.' I thought that was broad enough but apparently not? The loan closes next week and our lender is getting antsy about the perfection timing. Has anyone dealt with this kind of mismatch between the security interest agreement details and the UCC-1 collateral schedule? I'm wondering if we need to mirror the exact equipment list from the security interest agreement or if there's a standard way to handle this without listing every serial number on the UCC-1.

I've seen this exact issue before. The problem is your security interest agreement is super specific with model numbers and serials, but your UCC-1 collateral description is way too broad. Most states want some middle ground - you don't need every serial number on the UCC-1 but 'medical equipment' alone usually isn't enough for high-value loans. Try something like 'diagnostic medical equipment including but not limited to [list main categories] as more fully described in security agreement dated [date].' That usually satisfies the filing office while keeping it manageable.

0 coins

This is exactly right. The key is finding that sweet spot between too vague and too detailed. I always reference the security interest agreement date in the UCC-1 collateral description so there's a clear connection between the documents.

0 coins

Wait, can you actually reference the security agreement date in the UCC collateral description? I thought that wasn't allowed or something. Our attorney never mentioned that option.

0 coins

Ugh, been there! Last month our $320K equipment financing got held up for the same reason. The security interest agreement had every bolt and screw listed but we tried to keep the UCC-1 simple. Big mistake. What worked for us was using equipment categories plus the phrase 'as more particularly described in the security agreement.' Took three tries but it finally went through. The SOS office seems to want proof you're not just being lazy with the collateral description.

0 coins

Three tries?? That's brutal with a closing deadline looming. Did you have to pay new filing fees each time or did they waive them since it was their vague rejection criteria?

0 coins

Most states make you pay each time unfortunately. It's like they profit from unclear guidance. I always budget for at least two filing attempts now on complex collateral.

0 coins

Before you refile, try Certana.ai's document verification tool. I upload both my security interest agreement and draft UCC-1 to check for consistency issues like this. It flags when the collateral descriptions don't align properly and suggests specific language that works with most filing offices. Would have saved me weeks of back-and-forth on my last deal. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

Never heard of this but sounds useful. Does it actually know the specific requirements for different states or is it more general guidance?

0 coins

It's been pretty accurate for me across multiple states. Caught a debtor name mismatch between my loan docs and UCC that I completely missed. The consistency check is the real value - makes sure all your documents actually work together.

0 coins

The medical equipment category is tricky because it's so broad. I've had good luck with 'diagnostic and therapeutic medical equipment' or breaking it down by function like 'imaging equipment, monitoring devices, treatment apparatus.' The filing office wants to know you're securing real assets, not just throwing around generic terms. Your security interest agreement detail is actually good - just need to summarize it better for the UCC-1.

0 coins

That's smart about breaking it down by function. I always struggle with how specific to get without making the UCC-1 ten pages long.

0 coins

The functional approach works great for equipment loans. I use it all the time for manufacturing equipment - 'production machinery, quality control equipment, materials handling systems' etc.

0 coins

This is why I hate UCC filings. The rules are so inconsistent between what they say they want and what they actually accept. Last year I had a filing rejected for being 'too specific' and another one rejected for being 'too vague.' It's like they flip a coin. Your security interest agreement sounds solid though - the UCC-1 just needs to reference it properly.

0 coins

The inconsistency drives me crazy too! I've started keeping a spreadsheet of what language works in each state just to avoid this nonsense.

0 coins

Smart approach. I wish there was a standardized format across all states instead of these guessing games with collateral descriptions.

0 coins

One thing that helps is adding 'together with all additions, accessions, replacements, and substitutions' to your collateral description. Gives you broader coverage and shows the filing office you understand secured transactions. Also make sure your debtor name on the UCC-1 exactly matches the security interest agreement - another common rejection reason.

0 coins

The additions and accessions language is crucial for equipment loans. Covers you if they upgrade or replace any of the original collateral.

0 coins

Good point about debtor name matching. I've seen filings rejected because the security agreement used 'ABC Medical LLC' but the UCC-1 had 'ABC Medical, LLC' with a comma.

0 coins

Try this exact language: 'Medical diagnostic and treatment equipment consisting of [list main categories from your security agreement] and all related accessories, software, attachments, and documentation, as more fully described in Security Agreement dated [date], together with all proceeds, products, and replacements thereof.' I've used variations of this for dozens of medical equipment loans and it almost always works.

0 coins

This is gold! Copying this template for my next medical equipment filing. The 'software and documentation' part is especially important nowadays.

0 coins

Perfect timing - I have a dental equipment loan closing next week and was dreading the collateral description. This template should work perfectly.

0 coins

I had a similar rejection last month but discovered I could use Certana.ai to verify my security interest agreement against the UCC-1 before filing. It caught the collateral description mismatch immediately and suggested better language. Super easy - just upload both documents and it shows you exactly where they don't align. Saved me the rejection and refiling fees.

0 coins

That's exactly what I need! I'm terrible at catching these document consistency issues before they cause problems.

0 coins

The cross-checking feature sounds really useful. I spend way too much time manually comparing security agreements to UCCs to make sure everything matches up.

0 coins

Don't forget to check if your state has any special requirements for medical equipment. Some states want FDA device classifications or require specific language about healthcare equipment. Also double-check that your security interest agreement and UCC-1 have identical debtor information - entity type, address, everything. One small difference and you're back to square one.

0 coins

Good reminder about state-specific requirements. California has some weird rules about medical device collateral that caught me off guard once.

0 coins

The debtor information matching is so important. I always do a side-by-side comparison of every field before submitting.

0 coins

Update us when you get it sorted out! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a veterinary equipment loan and curious what language finally works for you. The security interest agreement has like 30 different pieces of equipment listed but I know the UCC-1 can't be that detailed.

0 coins

Yes please update! These equipment financing UCCs are always tricky and it helps to know what actually works in practice.

0 coins

I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference. The template language from earlier should work for veterinary equipment too with minor tweaks.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today