UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just want to add - make sure your collateral description is specific enough too. "Restaurant equipment" might be too vague for NJ. Try "restaurant kitchen equipment, furniture, and fixtures" or something more detailed.

0 coins

For equipment loans, you usually want to be specific about the type of equipment. "All restaurant kitchen equipment including but not limited to ovens, refrigerators, prep tables, and related fixtures" is better than just "restaurant equipment.

0 coins

Exactly. The more specific you are, the less likely you'll get questions from the filing office.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar situation in Pennsylvania right now. Different state but same frustration with debtor name formatting. It's crazy how much time these little details can waste.

0 coins

It really is frustrating! Especially when you're under a deadline. Hope you get yours sorted out too.

0 coins

Thanks! I think I'm going to try that document checking tool too. Seems like it could save a lot of headaches.

0 coins

One more thing - keep a copy of that business registry search showing the correct name. Some lawyers like to see proof that you verified the official name before filing.

0 coins

Great point. I'll screenshot the registry page showing the exact name.

0 coins

Smart practice. Documentation helps if anyone questions the filing later.

0 coins

For the collateral description, try something like 'Three (3) Caterpillar excavators, serial numbers [list them], and one (1) crane, make/model/serial number [details]' - very specific but still covers everything properly.

0 coins

Yeah that description will definitely pass muster. Clear and specific.

0 coins

I use similar formats for equipment. Works well and makes everyone happy.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - if this continuation is for a syndicated loan or has multiple lenders, make sure you notify all parties about the filing delay. Some loan agreements have specific notification requirements if there are issues with UCC maintenance.

0 coins

Good catch. I'll send an email to all the lenders tonight explaining the situation and what steps I'm taking.

0 coins

Documentation is key. Keep records of everything - the system errors, your call attempts, email notifications. CYA mode activated.

0 coins

Has anyone had luck with the mobile version of the secretary of state UCC portal? Sometimes mobile sites work when the main portal is down, though filing capabilities might be limited.

0 coins

Tried that yesterday - mobile site just redirects to the main portal which is still broken

0 coins

Worth a shot though. Some state systems have separate mobile infrastructure.

0 coins

Whatever you do, don't keep filing and hoping it works. Each rejection delays your priority date and if there's a competing lien filed while you're figuring this out, you could lose your position. Get the name exactly right before you file again.

0 coins

Absolutely right. Better to take the time to get it perfect than risk losing lien priority because of multiple rejections.

0 coins

Exactly. I've seen deals fall apart because someone kept re-filing instead of fixing the underlying name issue first.

0 coins

Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Mass and curious what ends up working for you.

0 coins

Will do! I'm going to try the Certificate of Good Standing approach and maybe that document verification tool that was mentioned.

0 coins

Definitely try Certana.ai - it really does catch these kinds of name mismatches before you waste time on another rejection.

0 coins

Been doing UCC filings for 8 years and name rejections under § 9.506 still catch me off guard sometimes. The statute says minor errors don't make a filing ineffective, but "minor" is in the eye of the beholder apparently. Sarah J vs Sarah Jane shouldn't matter but here we are.

0 coins

Common sense doesn't always align with UCC search logic unfortunately. The automated systems are pretty literal.

0 coins

This is why I always tell people to think like a computer when preparing UCC names. Exact matches only.

0 coins

Quick update - we refiled with the exact driver's license name and it was accepted same day. Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to implement better name verification procedures going forward to avoid this headache again.

0 coins

Smart move on the verification procedures. Those document checking tools really do help prevent these issues.

0 coins

Good to hear you got it sorted quickly. These name rejections are always frustrating but at least the fix is straightforward.

0 coins

Prev1...451452453454455...684Next