


Ask the community...
Been doing secured transactions for 15 years and I still see the same mistakes over and over. Wrong debtor names, vague collateral descriptions, missing after-acquired property clauses. Take your time, be precise, and verify everything twice. A rejected UCC-1 can delay your closing and mess up your priority position.
What's the most common mistake you see with equipment financing deals specifically?
Debtor name errors, hands down. People use trade names, DBAs, or abbreviated versions instead of the exact legal entity name. Always kills the filing.
ugh the secretary of state filing systems are so picky about formatting and exact names. one wrong character and boom rejection letter in your email. at least most states do electronic filing now so you find out faster than the old paper days
depends on the state but usually same day or next business day. much better than waiting weeks for paper filings
Some states even give you instant confirmation if there are no errors. Pretty nice when it works.
The process varies so much by state it's ridiculous. Delaware has a great online system, but try searching UCC filings in Louisiana and you'll want to pull your hair out. Budget extra time if you're dealing with multiple states.
At least they have an online system now. Some states still require written requests and take weeks to respond.
True, but when you're trying to close a deal on a timeline, weeks might as well be forever.
Consider using a service like Certana.ai if you're dealing with a lot of documents. You can upload the seller's UCC paperwork and it will verify everything matches up correctly - debtor names, filing numbers, amendment references. Much faster than doing manual document comparison, especially when you're dealing with multiple states and years of filings.
It's quite good at catching obvious inconsistencies and name mismatches. I still review everything myself but it saves a lot of time on the initial screening.
The key is using it as a tool, not a replacement for proper due diligence. But for flagging potential issues to investigate further, it's been really helpful.
Update us when you figure out what was causing the search issues! Always curious to hear how these problems get resolved. Missouri seems to have more quirks than most states.
Yeah, please update! I do searches in Missouri regularly and would love to know what the issue was.
One more thing to check - make sure the company is actually organized in Missouri. If they're a foreign LLC registered to do business in Missouri, the UCC filings might be under a slightly different version of their name than what shows in the Missouri corporate database.
Foreign qualification can create all sorts of name variations. The registration might have abbreviations or formatting that doesn't match the home state charter.
This is exactly why I always check the corporate status first before running UCC searches. Saves a lot of confusion later.
File immediately, run comprehensive searches, document everything, and consider getting title insurance if available for this type of situation. The gap in perfection is a real concern but quick action minimizes the risk.
Didn't know title insurance was available for UCC perfection gaps. That's interesting.
Whatever you do, don't wait. Every day increases the risk that someone else files against your debtor. Alabama processes UCC-1s quickly so get it done today.
Thanks everyone. Filing the new UCC-1 this afternoon and will run searches to check for intervening liens. Appreciate all the guidance.
Samantha Johnson
Florida paralegal here - this is super common with LLC names in our system. The SOS database has character limits that sometimes force abbreviations. As long as the core identifying elements are there (Advanced, Solutions, LLC) you should be fine. I see this weekly and it's never caused perfection issues in my experience.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•Thank you! That's exactly the reassurance I needed. Have you ever seen these name variations cause problems in bankruptcy or foreclosure situations?
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
•Honestly no. The courts seem to understand that the SOS system has these quirks. As long as the filing is reasonably identifiable they don't make a big deal out of minor abbreviations.
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
One more suggestion - have you checked if there are any other UCC filings against this same debtor under either name variation? Sometimes seeing how other lenders filed against the same entity can give you confidence in your approach.
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
•Yeah, if you see other filings with similar name abbreviations that haven't been challenged, that's a good sign your filing is fine too.
0 coins
Hannah White
•This is actually really smart detective work. The SOS system probably handles similar names the same way consistently.
0 coins