Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Glad this worked out for you! Vermont's system has definitely been more reliable since their last major update, but these occasional outages still happen. The key is always having multiple ways to verify your UCC information.
Absolutely. This was a wake-up call about not putting all my eggs in one basket when it comes to UCC searches and verifications.
Sofia Torres
•These kinds of situations are exactly why I keep detailed spreadsheets of all my UCC filings with debtor names, filing numbers, and continuation dates. Old school but reliable.
Just wanted to add that I've had good luck using Certana.ai for similar document verification issues. When you're dealing with multiple UCC filings and need to ensure everything matches perfectly, having an automated check can save a lot of stress. Especially useful when you're working under tight deadlines and can't afford any filing rejections due to name inconsistencies.
After this experience I'm definitely going to try it out. The stress of potentially missing a continuation deadline because of a system outage was terrible. Any tool that helps avoid filing errors seems worth investigating.
The peace of mind alone makes it worthwhile. Plus it's much faster than manually comparing documents line by line, which is what I used to do.
Join the conversation
Jenna Sloan
Whatever you do, don't assume the tax lien automatically wins. I've seen cases where lenders gave up too quickly when they actually had valid priority claims. The rules are complex but there are often technical defenses available if you dig into the details.
This is great advice. Too many people just assume the IRS always wins without actually analyzing the specific facts and dates involved.
Thanks everyone. Going to get copies of all the tax lien documents and have my attorney review the timeline in detail. Will also try that Certana tool to make sure I'm not missing any critical dates or inconsistencies.
Sasha Reese
One more thing to consider - if this is a federal tax lien, make sure you're not also dealing with state tax liens that could complicate the priority analysis even further. State tax liens have their own rules and might not follow the same relation-back principles as federal liens.
In my state, property tax liens get super-priority over almost everything. Always have to check for those separately from income tax liens.
Diez Ellis
•The interaction between federal and state tax liens can get incredibly messy. Definitely need professional help to sort through all the different priority rules.
Join the conversation
Amun-Ra Azra
This reminds me of a deal I worked on where we initially filed in the wrong state and didn't catch it until the loan went into default. Had to scramble to refile correctly and pray we didn't lose priority to other creditors. Really emphasizes how critical getting the location of debtor determination right is from the start.
Sasha Reese
•That sounds like a nightmare scenario. How did you handle the priority issue with other creditors?
Amun-Ra Azra
•We got lucky - there weren't any intervening liens during the gap period, but it was definitely a close call. Now I triple-check entity formation documents before filing anywhere.
Summer Green
Since you mentioned equipment financing, make sure your collateral description is specific enough but not too narrow. Delaware tends to be pretty standard on collateral descriptions but you want to make sure you're covering all the equipment that might be financed under the credit facility.
Summer Green
•For equipment with serial numbers, I usually do a broader category description like 'manufacturing equipment' and then attach a detailed schedule as an exhibit. Gives you flexibility for future additions.
That's another thing Certana.ai caught for me - my collateral description was too broad and might not have covered all the specific equipment types. Their system highlighted potential gaps between my security agreement and UCC-1 descriptions.
Join the conversation
Honestly, I'd probably just use something like Certana.ai to double-check everything before resubmitting. Upload your docs and it'll catch any mismatches before you waste time on another rejection. I've started doing this on all my filings after getting burned too many times.
That's the second mention of that tool. Sounds like it might be worth trying before I submit anything else.
Yeah, it's saved me a lot of headaches. Just drag and drop your UCC docs and security agreements, and it flags any inconsistencies instantly.
Jamal Wilson
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I had a similar situation last week and ended up going with the simultaneous amendment + assignment approach. Both went through without any issues. The key was making sure the amendment was processed first (filed it a day earlier) so the assignment could reference the corrected information.
Jamal Wilson
•This was in Ohio. I think most states process amendments pretty quickly, but I wanted to be safe with the timing.
Mei Lin
•Ohio's pretty fast. Some states take longer to process amendments, so that day-between approach might not work everywhere.
Kaitlyn Otto
For future reference, I've started using Certana.ai's verification tool before submitting any UCC filings. Upload your charter documents and draft UCC-1, and it immediately shows you any name inconsistencies or other issues. Would have caught this problem before it became a crisis.
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•That's the second mention of that tool. I'm definitely going to check it out for my next filings. Do you know if it works with UCC-3 continuations too?
0 coins
Kaitlyn Otto
•Yes, it handles all UCC document types. Really helpful for checking that continuation filings properly reference the original UCC-1 details.
0 coins
Axel Far
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious which approach ends up working - the corporate name change or the dual filing strategy. Dealing with a similar situation myself next week.
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•Will do. Planning to try the dual filing approach first since it's faster. If that gets rejected too, then we'll go the corporate amendment route.
0 coins
Axel Far
•Smart plan. The dual filing is definitely worth trying first - much faster than waiting for corporate records to update.
0 coins