UCC filing rejected - security agreement for car loan debtor name mismatch
Filed a UCC-1 last week for our dealership's floor plan financing and got rejected by the SOS office. The security agreement shows the borrower as 'Mike's Auto Sales LLC' but I filed under 'Michael's Auto Sales LLC' thinking that was more formal. Now I'm panicking because the loan docs are already signed and the cars are on the lot. Is this going to void our security interest? The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match exactly' but I thought LLC variations were okay. This is a $850,000 credit line so getting this wrong could be catastrophic for us.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Liam Brown
Exact name match is CRITICAL for UCC filings. Even small variations can invalidate your security interest. You need to refile immediately using the exact name from the security agreement - 'Mike's Auto Sales LLC'. The good news is you can usually get this corrected quickly since it's just a name issue.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•This happened to us last year with 'Johnson & Sons Inc.' vs 'Johnson and Sons Inc.' - ampersand vs 'and' killed our filing. Had to scramble to fix it before the debtor filed bankruptcy.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•Wait, I thought as long as the EIN matched it was okay? Our attorney said minor name variations don't matter if the tax ID is right.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•EIN matching helps but doesn't override exact name requirements. The UCC search logic is very literal - 'Mike's' and 'Michael's' are completely different to the system.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
You need to check what name appears on the debtor's formation documents with the state. Sometimes the official name is different from what they use day-to-day. Pull their articles of incorporation or LLC filing to be 100% sure.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Good point - I should have done that first. I just assumed 'Michael's' was more professional but you're right, I need to check their actual registered name.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•Secretary of State business search is your friend here. Don't guess on entity names ever.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
I had a similar nightmare with name mismatches eating up days of filing time. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document checker - you upload your security agreement and UCC-1 PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies before filing. Would have caught your Mike's vs Michael's issue immediately.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•That sounds incredibly useful right now. Does it check other fields too or just names?
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•It cross-checks everything - debtor names, addresses, collateral descriptions, filing numbers. Basically prevents exactly what happened to you.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Never heard of Certana but document verification tools are becoming essential. Too many manual errors in UCC prep.
0 coins
Mason Davis
Floor plan financing rejections are THE WORST because inventory is moving constantly. File the corrected UCC-1 today if possible. Most states process corrections within 24-48 hours if submitted electronically.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Already pulling the security agreement to verify the exact name spelling. Hoping to refile by end of business today.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
•Electronic filing is definitely faster but double-check every character this time. One typo and you're back to square one.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
This is why I HATE UCC filings!!! The system is so picky about every little detail but gives you zero helpful feedback. 'Debtor name does not match exactly' - match what exactly?? So frustrating when you're trying to secure a huge loan.
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
•I feel your pain. Lost a deal once because of a comma placement in a corporate name. The UCC system is unforgiving.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•At least they tell you it's a name issue. Some rejection notices are completely cryptic.
0 coins
Mila Walker
Question - if the cars are already on your lot, are you at risk if something happens before the corrected filing is processed? Like if the debtor goes bankrupt tomorrow?
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Technically yes, there's a gap in protection. But if you file the correction promptly and can show the original was just a clerical error, courts are usually reasonable.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. $850k in exposure makes me very nervous about any gaps.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•Document everything - the original filing attempt, rejection notice, immediate correction. Shows good faith effort to perfect your interest.
0 coins
Logan Scott
Had a client use one of those automated verification services after getting burned on name mismatches. Certana.ai I think? They said it caught inconsistencies they never would have spotted manually. Might be worth checking out for future filings.
0 coins
Chloe Green
•Automation is definitely the way to go. Human eyes miss too many details when you're rushing through paperwork.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•After this mess, I'm definitely looking into better verification tools. Can't afford these kinds of mistakes with our volume.
0 coins
Lucas Adams
UPDATE PLEASE - did you get the corrected filing submitted? Dying to know how this turned out since I'm dealing with similar name issues on a equipment financing deal.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Still waiting on confirmation from SOS but I refiled with 'Mike's Auto Sales LLC' exactly as shown on their formation docs. Fingers crossed!
0 coins
Lucas Adams
•Good luck! Let us know when it gets accepted so we can all breathe easier.
0 coins
Harper Hill
For anyone reading this thread - ALWAYS verify entity names through official state records before filing UCC documents. Don't rely on business cards, letterhead, or what the client tells you. Save yourself the headache.
0 coins
Caden Nguyen
•This should be pinned at the top of every UCC forum. Entity name verification 101.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•Learned this lesson the hard way too. Now I always pull formation docs first thing.
0 coins
Avery Flores
Final thought - consider having a checklist for UCC prep that includes cross-referencing all document names. These million-dollar mistakes are preventable with better processes.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Absolutely implementing a checklist after this experience. Too much money at stake to rely on memory and assumptions.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•That's exactly why tools like Certana exist - to systematically catch what checklists might miss. Worth the investment for high-value deals.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•Checklists plus automation equals much better accuracy. Both are needed for complex commercial filings.
0 coins