< Back to UCC Document Community

Finley Garrett

UCC-1 filing rejected - security agreement form for vehicle debtor name mismatch

Had my UCC-1 filing rejected yesterday and I'm pulling my hair out. Filed a security agreement form for vehicle collateral on a $45,000 truck loan and the SOS system kicked it back saying debtor name doesn't match exactly with the title records. The borrower goes by 'Mike Johnson' on all our loan docs but apparently the vehicle title shows 'Michael D. Johnson' - didn't even know about the middle initial until now. This is for a commercial trucking operation and we need this lien perfected ASAP since the borrower is already using the truck for business. Anyone dealt with this exact name variation issue on vehicle security agreements? Do I need to amend our entire loan package or just refile the UCC-1 with the exact title name? The continuation clock is already ticking and I'm worried about the gap in perfection.

Madison Tipne

•

This happens more than you'd think with vehicle security agreements. The golden rule is ALWAYS match the debtor name exactly as it appears on the certificate of title - not how they sign documents or what they prefer to be called. 'Mike Johnson' vs 'Michael D. Johnson' will definitely cause rejection because the UCC search logic can't connect them. You'll need to refile the UCC-1 with 'Michael D. Johnson' as the exact debtor name.

0 coins

Absolutely right about exact name matching. I learned this the hard way on a $75K equipment deal where 'Robert Smith Jr.' on our docs didn't match 'Robert Smith, Jr.' on the title (just the comma placement). Two week delay while we sorted it out.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

Wait, does this mean I need to redo my entire security agreement paperwork too? Or can I just file the UCC-1 with the correct name and keep my loan docs as-is?

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

You don't necessarily need to redo your entire loan package - the security agreement can still reference 'Mike Johnson' if that's how the borrower signed. The key is getting the UCC-1 filing right with 'Michael D. Johnson' to match the title. But definitely verify this is the EXACT name on the title certificate first. Sometimes there are other variations like suffixes or middle names that aren't obvious.

0 coins

Thanks - I actually called the DMV and confirmed it's 'Michael D. Johnson' on the title. No suffixes or other surprises. So I can refile the UCC-1 with that exact name and my security agreement stays as-is?

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

Correct. The UCC-1 is what creates the public notice and needs to match public records. Your private security agreement between you and Mike/Michael can reference either name as long as it's clear you're dealing with the same person.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

I'd be careful about that advice. Some states are really picky about consistency across all documents. Better safe than sorry to make sure everything aligns perfectly.

0 coins

Had a similar nightmare last month with a vehicle security agreement where the borrower's business name was slightly different on the title vs our loan docs. Spent hours manually cross-checking everything until someone mentioned Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your security agreement and UCC forms as PDFs and it instantly flags any name mismatches or inconsistencies between documents. Saved me from filing incorrectly a second time.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana.ai - does it actually work for UCC filings? I'm terrified of making another mistake on this refiling.

0 coins

Yeah it's specifically designed for UCC document verification. You upload your security agreement PDF and your UCC-1 PDF and it cross-checks debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing numbers - all the stuff that causes rejections. Found three mismatches I would have missed manually.

0 coins

Henry Delgado

•

Interesting. How accurate is it compared to doing the verification yourself? I've always just done line-by-line comparisons but that takes forever on complex deals.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

The bigger question is whether you need to worry about the perfection gap. Technically your security interest attaches when the borrower signs the security agreement and you give value (the loan funds). The UCC-1 filing just perfects it against third parties. If no other creditors are involved and the borrower isn't in bankruptcy proceedings, a few days delay might not be critical.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

•

That's true in theory but I'd never recommend taking that risk on a commercial vehicle. Too many ways for other liens to jump ahead if you're not perfected. File correctly ASAP.

0 coins

Yeah this is a working truck for a small trucking company. Can't risk other creditors getting priority. Need to get this filed correctly immediately.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

Commercial vehicles definitely carry more risk. I've seen mechanics liens and equipment financers swoop in on unperfected interests. Get that UCC-1 refiled today if possible.

0 coins

Quick question - are you filing in the state where the debtor is located or where the vehicle is titled? For vehicles it should be where the certificate of title is issued, not necessarily where the borrower lives or does business. This trips up a lot of lenders.

0 coins

Good catch - the truck is titled in Delaware but the borrower's business is in Pennsylvania. I filed in Delaware since that's where the title is issued. That should be correct, right?

0 coins

Yes, Delaware filing is correct for a Delaware-titled vehicle. The location of the debtor's business doesn't matter for vehicle collateral - it's all about the title jurisdiction.

0 coins

This is exactly why I use filing services for vehicle deals. Too many jurisdictional rules to keep track of and the consequences of getting it wrong are too severe.

0 coins

James Johnson

•

Been doing vehicle security agreements for 15 years and name mismatches are probably 70% of all UCC-1 rejections I see. The state systems have zero tolerance for variations. Even something like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' will get kicked back. Always, ALWAYS verify the exact name format before filing.

0 coins

So frustrating that the systems can't be smarter about obvious name variations. Like, clearly 'Mike Johnson' and 'Michael Johnson' are the same person!

0 coins

James Johnson

•

I get the frustration but the system is designed to be precise for legal certainty. If searches returned results for similar names, you'd have false matches and confusion about who actually has liens.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

The precision is actually a good thing from a due diligence perspective. Better to have false negatives than false positives when you're searching for existing liens.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

One thing to consider - when you refile with the correct name 'Michael D. Johnson', make sure your collateral description is also precise. For vehicle security agreements you want the VIN, year, make, model, and any other identifying details exactly as they appear on the title.

0 coins

Good point. I have '2023 Ford F-250 VIN: 1FT7W2B69NEA12345' in my collateral description. Should I add anything else from the title?

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

That looks good. VIN is the most critical identifier for vehicles. Some people add trim level or color but it's not necessary and can actually cause issues if those details are wrong.

0 coins

I always keep vehicle collateral descriptions simple - just year, make, model, VIN. Anything else is just more opportunity for errors and rejections.

0 coins

UPDATE: Just wanted to close the loop here. Refiled the UCC-1 with 'Michael D. Johnson' as the exact debtor name and it was accepted within 24 hours. Also ended up using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned to double-check everything before submitting - caught a small typo in the VIN that I would have missed. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

Glad the Certana verification worked out! It's amazing how many small errors slip through when you're manually checking everything.

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

Congrats on getting it sorted quickly. Name mismatches are such a pain but at least now you know to always verify the exact title format first.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

Good reminder for all of us to slow down and verify names carefully. Easy mistake to make but expensive to fix if you don't catch it early.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

This thread is gold for anyone doing vehicle financing. Bookmarking for future reference. The debtor name exactness requirement has bitten me more times than I care to admit.

0 coins

Same here. I've started keeping a checklist specifically for vehicle UCC filings to make sure I don't skip the name verification step.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Smart approach. Vehicle security agreements have enough moving parts that a checklist is definitely worth having.

0 coins

For anyone reading this later - another common issue with vehicle security agreements is timing. If you're financing a purchase, make sure you understand whether you need to file the UCC-1 before or after the title is issued. Some states have specific requirements about the sequence.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

Really good point. I've seen deals where the lender filed too early and had to refile after the title was properly issued in the debtor's name.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

Purchase money security interests in vehicles can be tricky timing-wise. Always worth checking state-specific rules before you start the filing process.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

This is why I love having experienced closing agents for vehicle deals. Too many technical requirements to handle yourself unless you do it all the time.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today