UCC filing confusion with security agreement motor vehicle arkansas requirements
Really struggling here with a UCC-1 filing situation. We have a security agreement motor vehicle arkansas client where the borrower used different variations of their business name across documents. The original security agreement shows "ABC Motors LLC" but their registration paperwork has "ABC Motor Company LLC" and now I'm worried our UCC-1 filing might get rejected or be invalid because of the name mismatch. The collateral is commercial vehicles worth about $180k so getting this wrong could be catastrophic for our lien position. Has anyone dealt with debtor name variations on motor vehicle security agreements? I've heard horror stories about lenders losing their security interest over seemingly minor name discrepancies. The filing is due next week and I'm second-guessing everything at this point.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Miguel Diaz
Name consistency is absolutely critical for UCC filings, especially with motor vehicle collateral. The Secretary of State system will often reject filings automatically if the debtor name doesn't match exactly what's on file. You need to verify the exact legal name from the state business registry before submitting your UCC-1. Even small differences like "LLC" vs "L.L.C." can cause problems.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•This is so true! I had a filing rejected last month because of a period after "Inc" - apparently their system requires "Inc" without punctuation. These automated systems are incredibly picky.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Wait, but what if the security agreement was signed with the wrong name variation to begin with? Does that invalidate the whole security interest?
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•The security agreement and UCC filing need to be consistent, but courts generally look at whether the debtor can be reasonably identified. Still, why risk it when you can get it right from the start?
0 coins
Yara Abboud
I've been through this exact scenario with vehicle collateral. First, pull the business entity search from the state database to get the precise legal name. Then check if any trade names or DBAs are registered that might match your security agreement. For motor vehicle security agreements, you also want to make sure your collateral description is broad enough to cover all the vehicles but specific enough to be enforceable.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•Good point about the collateral description. Our security agreement lists specific VINs but I'm wondering if we should use a broader description on the UCC-1 in case they acquire additional vehicles.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•Exactly - you want something like "all motor vehicles, including but not limited to those listed in Schedule A" to cover future acquisitions. Just make sure Schedule A is properly attached and referenced.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
Had a similar name mismatch issue last year and found this tool called Certana.ai that actually saved me from a major filing mistake. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 documents and it automatically cross-checks all the debtor names, filing details, and document consistency. It caught three name variations I hadn't noticed across different documents. Really simple to use - just upload the PDFs and it highlights any discrepancies instantly.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Never heard of that but it sounds useful. How accurate is it with catching these kinds of technical issues?
0 coins
PixelPioneer
•It's been spot-on for me. The system compares everything automatically - names, addresses, collateral descriptions, filing numbers. Much better than trying to manually compare multiple documents and potentially missing something critical.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•That actually sounds perfect for my situation. I have like 6 different documents I need to make sure align properly before filing.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
OMG this is giving me anxiety just reading it!! I have a UCC continuation coming up and now I'm worried about name consistency issues. What happens if you've been filing with the wrong name variation for years? Do all your previous filings become invalid?? This is keeping me up at night.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Don't panic - courts look at the totality of circumstances. If the debtor was reasonably identifiable and there was no confusion about which entity was intended, you're probably fine. But going forward, definitely use the exact legal name.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•But what about perfection? If the name was wrong, was I ever properly perfected? This could affect our entire security position!
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Take a deep breath. Pull your filing history and compare it to the current state records. If there are discrepancies, you might want to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name going forward.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
The whole UCC system is such a mess when it comes to name matching. I've seen filings rejected for the most ridiculous reasons - extra spaces, different punctuation, abbreviations vs. full words. And don't get me started on the state-to-state variations in how they handle these issues. It's like they want us to make mistakes so they can collect more filing fees!
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
•Totally agree! The inconsistency between different SOS offices is maddening. What gets accepted in one state gets rejected in another.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•That's why I always do a test search before filing to make sure the name format matches what's already in their system. Extra step but worth avoiding the rejection headache.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
For motor vehicle security agreements specifically, you also need to consider whether any vehicles require separate title notation depending on your state's requirements. Some states require both UCC filing AND notation on the vehicle title for proper perfection. Make sure you're not missing that step.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•Oh wow, I hadn't even thought about title notation requirements. These are commercial vehicles, not sure if that changes anything.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
•Commercial vehicles usually follow the same title notation rules. Check your state's specific requirements - some have thresholds based on vehicle value or type.
0 coins
Emma Taylor
•In my experience, it's better to do both UCC filing and title notation when possible. Gives you maximum protection and avoids any arguments about proper perfection method.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Here's what I'd do in your situation: 1) Get the exact legal entity name from state records, 2) Compare it to your security agreement, 3) If there's a mismatch, consider amending the security agreement or getting a confirmation from the debtor about their legal name, 4) File the UCC-1 with the correct legal name, 5) Keep documentation of your due diligence process. Better to take extra time now than deal with a challenged security interest later.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•This is exactly the kind of step-by-step guidance I needed. Thank you! Going to start with the state entity search first thing Monday.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•Also recommend doing a UCC search under both name variations to see if there are any existing filings that might give you guidance on the preferred format.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
Quick thought - have you considered that document verification tool someone mentioned earlier? Certana.ai I think? If you're dealing with multiple name variations across documents, having an automated system catch those discrepancies could save you from exactly this kind of headache. I've started using it for all my complex filings where there are multiple entities or document versions involved.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•I was skeptical about these automated tools at first, but honestly anything that helps catch name mismatches before filing is worth it. The rejection and re-filing process is such a pain.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. At this point I need all the help I can get to make sure everything aligns properly.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and name consistency issues are still the #1 cause of problems I see. The good news is that once you establish a systematic approach to verifying debtor names, it becomes second nature. Always start with the state business entity database, cross-reference with your loan documents, and when in doubt, get written confirmation from the debtor about their exact legal name.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•15 years! You must have seen every possible name variation problem by now. Any other common mistakes you'd warn people about?
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•Oh definitely - watch out for entities that have changed their name since the security agreement was signed. Always check for amendments to the articles of incorporation. And don't assume the name on the loan documents is correct - I've seen plenty of errors there too.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a equipment financing deal and want to see how your approach works out. The name consistency issue seems to be becoming more common as businesses operate under multiple variations of their names.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•Will definitely update once I work through this. Thanks everyone for the advice - feeling much more confident about tackling this systematically now.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
•Yes please update! These real-world examples are so much more helpful than just reading the UCC code provisions.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Agreed - practical experience beats theoretical knowledge every time when it comes to UCC filings.
0 coins