UCC filing confusion with installment contract - debtor name issues
Running into problems with a UCC-1 filing for an installment contract and hoping someone can clarify the debtor name requirements. We have a customer who signed an installment agreement for manufacturing equipment ($185k total, 60 monthly payments). The contract shows their business name as 'Premier Welding Solutions LLC' but when I checked the Secretary of State database, their registered entity name is 'Premier Welding Solutions, LLC' (with the comma). Our UCC-1 was rejected twice now - once for the name mismatch and then again after we corrected it because apparently there's also an issue with how we described the collateral in the installment contract terms. The financing statement needs to match exactly but I'm getting conflicting guidance on whether we should use the contract name or the SOS registered name for installment contract UCCs. Anyone dealt with this specific debtor name situation on installment contracts? The customer is getting anxious about the delay and we need to perfect our security interest properly.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Isabella Oliveira
This is actually a pretty common issue with installment contracts. For the debtor name, you MUST use the exact registered name from the Secretary of State - so 'Premier Welding Solutions, LLC' with the comma. The installment contract itself doesn't matter for UCC purposes, it's all about what's on file with the state. I've seen so many filings get rejected because people use the contract name instead of the registered entity name.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Absolutely right about using the SOS name. I learned this the hard way on an installment deal last year - filed it three times before getting it right!
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•Question though - what if the installment contract was executed with the wrong entity name? Does that create other legal issues beyond just the UCC filing?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
Had this exact same problem last month with an installment contract for construction equipment. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload both your installment contract and the UCC-1 draft, and it instantly flags name mismatches and collateral description inconsistencies. Would have saved me the multiple rejection headaches if I'd known about it earlier.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•Never heard of Certana.ai but sounds useful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•Yeah exactly - just upload your contract and UCC docs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Catches stuff like debtor name variations and collateral schedule mismatches that are easy to miss manually.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•This could be a game changer for installment contract filings. Manual checking is such a pain and easy to mess up.
0 coins
Diego Flores
Wait, what exactly was wrong with your collateral description? That might be the bigger issue here. Installment contracts can be tricky because you need to be specific about what equipment is covered versus what might be added later.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•The rejection notice said our collateral description was 'insufficient' but didn't specify what was wrong. We described it as 'manufacturing equipment per installment agreement dated [date]' but maybe that's too vague?
0 coins
Diego Flores
•Yeah that's probably too vague. You need to be more specific - 'welding equipment including but not limited to [specific items]' or reference the exact equipment schedule from your installment contract.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
•I always include serial numbers when available for installment contract equipment. Makes the collateral description bulletproof.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
Been filing UCCs for installment contracts for 15 years and the name issue trips up even experienced people. The key is ALWAYS check the Secretary of State database first, not the contract. Your customer probably gave you business cards or letterhead without the comma, but that doesn't matter - only the official registered name counts.
0 coins
StarStrider
•This is why I hate installment contract filings. So many moving parts compared to regular purchase money security interests.
0 coins
Zara Malik
•Actually installment contracts aren't that different from regular security agreements once you get the process down. Same UCC rules apply.
0 coins
Luca Marino
OP - did you check if there are any other registered variations of their name? Sometimes businesses have multiple entities or DBAs that could complicate the installment contract filing.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Good point, I should double-check that. Only searched for the exact name they gave me.
0 coins
Nia Davis
•Yeah definitely search variations. I once found a company had registered both with and without 'Inc.' and we almost filed against the wrong entity.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
For what it's worth, I've started using that Certana tool mentioned earlier for all my installment contract UCCs. It's been a lifesaver for catching these exact issues before filing. The document checker workflow specifically looks for debtor name mismatches between contracts and UCC forms.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•How long does the Certana verification usually take? Need something fast for time-sensitive installment deals.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•It's instant - just upload your PDFs and get results immediately. Perfect for those rush installment contract situations.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
The comma thing is SO annoying but you absolutely have to get it right. I've seen lenders lose perfection on installment contracts worth hundreds of thousands because of punctuation errors. Not worth the risk.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Wait, can you actually lose perfection over a comma? That seems extreme.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•Unfortunately yes - if the debtor name on the UCC doesn't match the registered entity name exactly, the filing can be deemed insufficient. Courts have ruled on this stuff.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•This is exactly why I'm paranoid about every character in debtor names now. Better safe than sorry with installment contracts.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
One more thing to consider - make sure your installment contract actually creates a security interest that requires a UCC filing. Some installment agreements are structured differently and might not need UCC perfection.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Good point. What determines if an installment contract needs a UCC filing versus not?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Depends on whether you're retaining a security interest in the equipment or if it's more like a conditional sale. Your contract language matters a lot here.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Update us when you get it figured out! Always curious to hear how these installment contract name issues get resolved.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Will do! Going to re-file with the exact SOS registered name and revise the collateral description to be more specific. Hopefully third time's the charm.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Good luck! These installment contract UCCs can be frustrating but you'll get it sorted.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
Just wanted to chime in that I had a similar installment contract situation last week and the Certana document verification caught a subtle name issue I would have missed. Saved me from another rejection cycle. Worth trying if you're still having problems.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•These document verification tools are becoming essential for installment contract work. Too easy to miss small details manually.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•Agreed. The old way of manually comparing contracts to UCC forms is too error-prone, especially with complex installment agreements.
0 coins