UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC-3 continuation filed but showing as lapsed - what did I miss?
Really need some guidance here. Filed a UCC-3 continuation back in October for a financing statement that was set to expire in December, but when I checked the system last week it's showing as lapsed. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2019 for equipment financing on some manufacturing equipment. I'm pretty sure I got the filing number right and used the correct debtor name from the original filing, but something obviously went wrong. Has anyone else run into this? The lender is asking questions and I need to figure out what happened. Did the continuation not go through properly or is there some other issue I'm missing?
Join the conversation
UCC search showing wrong debtor name - need help fast
Running into a major issue with a UCC search and really need some guidance here. We're trying to verify a UCC-1 filing from 2023 for a commercial loan refinance, but when I search the system using what should be the exact debtor name from our loan docs, I'm getting zero results. The borrower insists they filed correctly back then, but something's obviously not matching up. I've tried variations of the business name (with and without LLC, different punctuation) but still nothing. This is holding up a $275K equipment refinance and my client is getting antsy. Has anyone dealt with debtor name search issues like this? I'm wondering if there was some kind of filing error originally or if I'm just not searching correctly. The original filing should have been for manufacturing equipment as collateral. Any tips on search strategies or common name variations that might work? Time is really critical here since we're supposed to close next week.
Join the conversation
One more suggestion - have you tried doing a broader search by secured party name instead? If you know who the original lender was, that might help you locate the filing even with debtor name issues.
Smart idea! I do know the original lender name. That might be a good workaround to at least confirm the filing exists.
Exactly - and once you find it that way, you can see exactly how the debtor name was entered originally.
Update us when you figure this out! I'm always curious about these debtor name mysteries and what the actual issue turns out to be.
Will do! Hopefully I can get this resolved tomorrow. Thanks everyone for all the suggestions.
Good luck! These name matching issues are such a pain but usually there's a solution.
Vermont UCC search showing weird results - am I missing something?
Running into some confusion with Vermont UCC search results and hoping someone can help clarify what I'm seeing. We're doing due diligence on a equipment financing deal and when I search the Vermont Secretary of State UCC database, I'm getting inconsistent results depending on how I format the debtor name. Same company, but searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' versus 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with comma) returns different filings. Is this normal for Vermont's system or am I doing something wrong? The collateral involves heavy machinery so we need to make sure we're not missing any existing liens. Has anyone else run into search variations like this in Vermont?
Join the conversation
I actually had success with Certana's verification tool on a similar Vermont situation. Uploaded the corporate docs and three different UCC filings I found, and it flagged that two of them were actually for different entities with very similar names. Saved me from a potential mistake.
How long does that verification usually take? Is it instant or do you have to wait?
Pretty quick - just upload the PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Much faster than manually checking every name variation yourself.
Update us on what you find! I'm curious whether the 5 filings include the 3 you found in the first search or if they're completely different. That would tell us a lot about how Vermont's system handles name variations.
Will do - still working through all the results but it's looking like there's some overlap and some unique filings in each search. Definitely confirms the need for multiple search approaches.
Thanks for sharing this. Vermont UCC searches are always an adventure.
mo ucc online filing system keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name format issues?
Been trying to file a UCC-3 continuation through the mo ucc online filing portal for the past week and it keeps getting rejected. The original UCC-1 was filed back in 2020 for equipment financing on some construction machinery. Now I'm 45 days out from the 5-year expiration and every time I submit the continuation form, I get an automated rejection saying 'debtor name does not match filing records.' I've triple-checked the spelling and formatting but maybe I'm missing something with how names need to be entered in their system? The original debtor is 'Midwest Construction Solutions LLC' but I'm wondering if there's some specific formatting requirement for the mo ucc online filing system that I'm not catching. Has anyone else run into this with Missouri's online portal? Really don't want this lien to lapse because of a technicality.
Join the conversation
Quick thought - when you're copying the debtor name from the original filing, are you looking at the actual SOS database record or just your copy of the UCC-1 form? Sometimes there are transcription errors when the filing gets entered into their system.
Definitely check the database record. I've seen cases where the original filing had typos that got entered into the system, so you have to match the typo to get the continuation accepted.
This happened to me with a filing where the original had 'Constrcution' instead of 'Construction' - had to use the misspelled version for the continuation to work.
I was dealing with similar headaches with document consistency across multiple UCC filings and started using Certana.ai's verification tool. You just upload your PDFs and it automatically cross-checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, dates, collateral descriptions. Really helpful for catching those tiny discrepancies that cause rejections in picky systems like Missouri's.
It's not state-specific but it catches inconsistencies between documents that would cause problems anywhere. When I upload my original UCC-1 and continuation forms, it highlights any differences in how names, addresses, or other details are formatted.
Tools like that are becoming essential with how finicky these online filing systems are getting. Better to catch errors before you pay filing fees.
Filing a UCC lien in Texas - debtor name verification issues
I'm dealing with a nightmare situation where our equipment financing company needs to file UCC-1s in Texas and I keep running into debtor name problems. We've had three filings rejected by the Texas SOS office in the past month because of what they claim are 'debtor name discrepancies' but I'm following the exact names from the signed loan agreements. The collateral is construction equipment worth about $180K and we can't afford to have an unperfected security interest. Has anyone else dealt with Texas being super picky about exact debtor names on UCC filings? I'm getting different advice from our regular attorney vs the paralegal who usually handles these. One says use the DBA name, the other says use the legal entity name from the Secretary of State records. At this point I'm worried we're going to miss our perfection window entirely.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact same situation 2 weeks ago! Had a UCC-1 rejected because I used 'Corp' instead of 'Corporation' in the debtor name. Texas doesn't accept any abbreviations or variations. Had to completely redo the filing with the full legal name. So frustrating but lesson learned.
Exactly! Now I triple check everything and use document verification tools before submitting. Can't afford more rejections when clients are breathing down my neck about perfection timing.
That's smart. I started using Certana.ai after a similar rejection nightmare. Upload your entity docs and UCC forms and it flags any discrepancies automatically. Catches stuff I would never notice manually.
Update - I found the exact issue! The Texas SOS database showed the LLC name with a comma before 'LLC' but our loan documents didn't have the comma. Filed the UCC-1 with the comma included and it was accepted within 24 hours. Thanks everyone for the help!
Perfect! Always feels good when you finally crack the code on these picky state requirements.
Thanks everyone! This thread probably saved me another week of rejections. Will definitely be more careful about exact name formatting going forward.
Liam Cortez
Just curious - what state are you filing in? Some states are more forgiving about minor name variations than others.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
AuthorI'd rather not say specifically but it's one of the stricter states when it comes to exact name matching.
0 coins
Liam Cortez
Ah, that explains it. The strict states really do require character-perfect matching. No wiggle room at all.
0 coins
Anita George
This exact thing happened to me! Turned out I had copied the debtor name from a different document that had slightly different formatting than the original UCC-1. Now I always pull the debtor name directly from the original filing record.
0 coins
Anita George
Yep, lesson learned the hard way. The UCC-1 record is the only source of truth for continuation filings.
0 coins
Mason Stone
Document verification tools help with this too - they can spot when you're using names from different sources that don't match exactly.
0 coins