


Ask the community...
One last thing - consider whether you need any special provisions for insurance proceeds. If the equipment gets destroyed, you want to make sure your security interest continues in the insurance payout.
I always require the lender to be named as loss payee or additional insured on the equipment policies. Gives you much better control over claims.
Just make sure the insurance requirements are realistic. I've seen deals where the insurance costs were so high they made the project uneconomical.
Thanks everyone, this has been incredibly helpful. I think I have a much better handle on what needs to be in the security agreement. Going to run everything through legal review before closing, but at least now I know what questions to ask. Definitely going to check out that document verification tool someone mentioned too - sounds like it could save me from making costly mistakes.
Smart approach. Better to spend a little extra on review upfront than deal with enforceability problems later.
Let us know how it goes! Always interested to hear about real-world applications of this stuff.
Following this thread because we're having similar issues with our UCC filings. The rejection rate has been brutal lately and we need a better system too.
Same here. Started tracking our rejection rate last quarter and it's embarrassing how many simple errors we're making.
The verification tools mentioned earlier might help. I've been researching Certana.ai after seeing it recommended in a few threads and it looks promising for catching those pre-submission errors.
Update on the MA service I mentioned - it was Corporate Filing Solutions. They told me they handle multiple states including CT. Might be worth a call to see if they can help with your volume.
Before you file, I'd suggest using a document verification service to double-check everything. I tried Certana.ai after someone here recommended it and it caught several inconsistencies between my security agreement and UCC-1 draft that I completely missed. Really simple - just upload your PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Definitely worth it for a $285k financing to avoid any filing issues.
Two people have mentioned Certana now - sounds like it might be worth checking out before I submit the filing.
I deal with PA UCC filings regularly and their search function is inconsistent at best. Sometimes I find filings by searching the secured party name instead of the debtor name. Also try searching with different date ranges - sometimes that helps narrow things down.
Update us when you figure this out! I'm curious to know what the issue was. These database problems are becoming way too common with state UCC systems.
Good plan. Hopefully it's just a simple database glitch and not something more serious.
Keep us posted! This stuff makes me nervous about my own filings now.
Connor Murphy
One thing that helped me was creating a checklist based on Article 9 requirements. Goes through debtor name verification, collateral description adequacy, proper filing office selection, all that stuff. Boring but effective.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Sure, I can put together the basics. Main thing is having a systematic approach instead of just winging it.
0 coins
Zainab Khalil
•Checklists are great but automated verification still catches things humans miss. Best to use both approaches.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
Just want to echo what others said about Certana.ai - tried it after seeing it mentioned here and it really does find discrepancies I would have missed. Uploaded a charter document and UCC-1 that I thought matched perfectly and it flagged three inconsistencies.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•Yeah it's become part of my regular workflow now. Quick upload and verification before submission.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•Definitely worth trying. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections after the fact.
0 coins