Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more suggestion - have you tried doing a broader search by secured party name instead? If you know who the original lender was, that might help you locate the filing even with debtor name issues.
Smart idea! I do know the original lender name. That might be a good workaround to at least confirm the filing exists.
Exactly - and once you find it that way, you can see exactly how the debtor name was entered originally.
Mateo Silva
Update us when you figure this out! I'm always curious about these debtor name mysteries and what the actual issue turns out to be.
Will do! Hopefully I can get this resolved tomorrow. Thanks everyone for all the suggestions.
Good luck! These name matching issues are such a pain but usually there's a solution.
Join the conversation
Liam Cortez
Just curious - what state are you filing in? Some states are more forgiving about minor name variations than others.
I'd rather not say specifically but it's one of the stricter states when it comes to exact name matching.
Liam Cortez
•Ah, that explains it. The strict states really do require character-perfect matching. No wiggle room at all.
Anita George
This exact thing happened to me! Turned out I had copied the debtor name from a different document that had slightly different formatting than the original UCC-1. Now I always pull the debtor name directly from the original filing record.
Anita George
•Yep, lesson learned the hard way. The UCC-1 record is the only source of truth for continuation filings.
Mason Stone
•Document verification tools help with this too - they can spot when you're using names from different sources that don't match exactly.
Join the conversation
Thais Soares
Bottom line for your situation - file the UCC-1 with 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions LLC' as the debtor name, make sure your security agreement broadly covers all receivables generated by that entity, and you should be fine. The trade name issue is a red herring.
Nalani Liu
•Exactly. I've never seen a court invalidate a properly filed UCC just because the debtor does business under a shortened version of their legal name.
Axel Bourke
•The key is 'properly filed' - which means using the exact charter name on the UCC-1.
Aidan Percy
Thanks everyone - going to refile with the full LLC designation and update our security agreement language to be more explicit about covering all forms of receivables. Appreciate the guidance on this.
Smart move. Better to be overly precise than risk your security interest.
Let us know how the refiling goes. Always good to hear about successful resolutions to these name matching issues.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to follow up - I used that Certana tool someone mentioned and it immediately flagged three name discrepancies between our corporate docs and the proposed UCC-1. Turned out the attorney was working from an old version of the articles. Tool literally saved the deal.
NeonNomad
•Nice when technology actually solves the problem instead of creating new ones.
Perfect example of why we can't just rely on Article 1 interpretations without checking the actual documents.
For future reference, most state UCC filing guides have a specific section about entity name requirements that references the applicable state business entity statutes. Much more authoritative than trying to argue Article 1 general principles.
Good point. The state filing guides are usually pretty clear about what they'll accept and what they won't.
And they're updated regularly so you know you're getting current requirements.
PixelWarrior
Quick question - when you say they incorporated in Delaware, did they actually move the business there or just reincorporate for tax reasons? UCC 9 301 cares about legal organization, not business operations, but it might affect your strategy.
0 coins
Luca Conti
•Just reincorporated for legal reasons as far as I know. All their operations, equipment, and management are still in Texas. Only the corporate charter moved to Delaware.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•That's pretty common but it still triggers UCC 9 301 location change requirements. Delaware incorporation with Texas operations is classic but you still need to follow Delaware filing rules for the corporate entity.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
Bottom line on UCC 9 301: Get a Delaware UCC-1 filed TODAY covering all collateral. File a UCC-3 termination in Texas only after you're sure the Delaware filing is effective. Don't take chances with a $2.8M position. The cost of duplicate filings is nothing compared to losing your security interest.
0 coins
Luca Conti
•Thanks, that's the most practical advice yet. I'll get our attorney to handle the Delaware filing immediately. Better safe than sorry with this much money on the line.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•Smart move. And document everything about when you discovered the Delaware incorporation so you have a paper trail showing you acted promptly once you knew about the UCC 9 301 issue.
0 coins