UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Connor Murphy

•

One thing that helped me was creating a checklist based on Article 9 requirements. Goes through debtor name verification, collateral description adequacy, proper filing office selection, all that stuff. Boring but effective.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Sure, I can put together the basics. Main thing is having a systematic approach instead of just winging it.

0 coins

Zainab Khalil

•

Checklists are great but automated verification still catches things humans miss. Best to use both approaches.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Just want to echo what others said about Certana.ai - tried it after seeing it mentioned here and it really does find discrepancies I would have missed. Uploaded a charter document and UCC-1 that I thought matched perfectly and it flagged three inconsistencies.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Yeah it's become part of my regular workflow now. Quick upload and verification before submission.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Definitely worth trying. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections after the fact.

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

One last thing - consider whether you need any special provisions for insurance proceeds. If the equipment gets destroyed, you want to make sure your security interest continues in the insurance payout.

0 coins

I always require the lender to be named as loss payee or additional insured on the equipment policies. Gives you much better control over claims.

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

Just make sure the insurance requirements are realistic. I've seen deals where the insurance costs were so high they made the project uneconomical.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, this has been incredibly helpful. I think I have a much better handle on what needs to be in the security agreement. Going to run everything through legal review before closing, but at least now I know what questions to ask. Definitely going to check out that document verification tool someone mentioned too - sounds like it could save me from making costly mistakes.

0 coins

Smart approach. Better to spend a little extra on review upfront than deal with enforceability problems later.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

Let us know how it goes! Always interested to hear about real-world applications of this stuff.

0 coins

Vanessa Chang

•

Following this thread because we're having similar issues with our UCC filings. The rejection rate has been brutal lately and we need a better system too.

0 coins

Madison King

•

Same here. Started tracking our rejection rate last quarter and it's embarrassing how many simple errors we're making.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

The verification tools mentioned earlier might help. I've been researching Certana.ai after seeing it recommended in a few threads and it looks promising for catching those pre-submission errors.

0 coins

Ella Knight

•

Update on the MA service I mentioned - it was Corporate Filing Solutions. They told me they handle multiple states including CT. Might be worth a call to see if they can help with your volume.

0 coins

Perfect timing! I'll reach out to them tomorrow. Thanks for following up with the name.

0 coins

Corporate Filing Solutions did our Delaware filings last year. Good experience overall, professional staff.

0 coins

James Johnson

•

Before you file, I'd suggest using a document verification service to double-check everything. I tried Certana.ai after someone here recommended it and it caught several inconsistencies between my security agreement and UCC-1 draft that I completely missed. Really simple - just upload your PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Definitely worth it for a $285k financing to avoid any filing issues.

0 coins

Two people have mentioned Certana now - sounds like it might be worth checking out before I submit the filing.

0 coins

James Johnson

•

Yeah, especially for your first time with a security agreement like ree680109-sa where you're unsure about the name formatting. Better safe than sorry with that size loan.

0 coins

Update us when you get the filing submitted! Always curious how these name matching situations work out.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to file early next week once I get everything double-checked.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Looking forward to hearing how it goes. Sounds like you've got a good plan in place.

0 coins

I deal with PA UCC filings regularly and their search function is inconsistent at best. Sometimes I find filings by searching the secured party name instead of the debtor name. Also try searching with different date ranges - sometimes that helps narrow things down.

0 coins

Yeah, sometimes that's the only way to find problem filings. Their database indexing isn't perfect.

0 coins

I've had luck searching by filing date ranges too. Sometimes the exact date search doesn't work but a range will pull up the filing.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

Update us when you figure this out! I'm curious to know what the issue was. These database problems are becoming way too common with state UCC systems.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

Good plan. Hopefully it's just a simple database glitch and not something more serious.

0 coins

Libby Hassan

•

Keep us posted! This stuff makes me nervous about my own filings now.

0 coins

Prev1...680681682683684Next