Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai's verification tool for exactly this type of situation. When state search results look suspicious, I upload all the UCC documents and let it check for inconsistencies. It's caught several cases where search results didn't match the actual filing status. Saves me from having to call the state office for every questionable result.
Does Certana work well with complex collateral descriptions? Some of our equipment liens have really detailed collateral schedules.
Yes, it handles complex collateral descriptions well. The tool checks consistency between the UCC-1 and any amendments to make sure nothing got changed incorrectly.
Delaware UCC searches have been problematic for years. I keep a spreadsheet of all the discrepancies I find between search results and actual filings. It's gotten worse since they upgraded their system last year. The only reliable way is to pull and review every single document manually.
Those error rates are way too high for something as critical as lien searches. No wonder everyone double-checks everything.
Demi Lagos
•This is making me paranoid about all the Delaware searches I've done recently. Time to go back and verify everything manually.
Join the conversation
Maya Patel
I've used the Delaware system many times and it's pretty user-friendly. Make sure you have the debtor's exact legal name and address from their corporate records. The system is picky about formatting.
Ethan Wilson
•I'll pull their certificate of incorporation to make sure I have everything exact. Thanks for the tip.
That's exactly what I was talking about with the document verification. Those little details can kill a filing if you're not careful.
One more thing - keep copies of everything and calendar your continuation deadline. Nothing worse than having a lapse because you forgot to continue the filing.
NeonNova
•Smart. I usually set multiple reminders starting 6 months out just to be safe.
That's a good practice. Clients don't like finding out their security interest lapsed.
Join the conversation
Bottom line advice: with an $850k loan and names that different, file a new UCC-1 with the current legal name. Don't mess around with amendments when the name change is this substantial. File it soon, get your confirmation, then terminate the old filing. Sleep better at night knowing your perfection is solid.
Exactly. The cost of a new filing is nothing compared to the risk of losing perfection on an $850k security interest.
Monique Byrd
•And document everything. Keep records of when you learned about the name change, when you filed the new UCC-1, everything. Bank examiners love documentation.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like the consensus is pretty clear - file a new UCC-1 rather than risk the amendment approach with names this different. I'll get that started this week. Really appreciate all the practical guidance from people who've been through similar situations.
Lia Quinn
•Good choice. Better safe than sorry with UCC perfection issues.
Haley Stokes
•Let us know how it goes! Always good to hear back on how these situations resolve.
Join the conversation
One thing that helped me was creating a checklist based on Article 9 requirements. Goes through debtor name verification, collateral description adequacy, proper filing office selection, all that stuff. Boring but effective.
Sure, I can put together the basics. Main thing is having a systematic approach instead of just winging it.
Checklists are great but automated verification still catches things humans miss. Best to use both approaches.
GalaxyGazer
Just want to echo what others said about Certana.ai - tried it after seeing it mentioned here and it really does find discrepancies I would have missed. Uploaded a charter document and UCC-1 that I thought matched perfectly and it flagged three inconsistencies.
GalaxyGazer
•Yeah it's become part of my regular workflow now. Quick upload and verification before submission.
Paolo Conti
•Definitely worth trying. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections after the fact.
Olivia Garcia
For Martinez Construction LLC specifically, make sure you're searching exactly as it appears on their Articles of Organization. If the search still isn't working properly, you can always call the Illinois SOS UCC division directly. They're usually helpful with search issues.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•I didn't know you could call them directly about search problems. Do they actually help or just tell you to figure it out yourself?
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•They're generally helpful, especially if you have specific filing numbers to reference. Much better than trying to navigate their online help system.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
Just to close the loop - I ended up using one of those document verification services someone mentioned earlier and found that our UCC-1 had the debtor name correct, but I was searching using a slightly different variation. The tool flagged that the Articles of Organization showed "Martinez Construction LLC" exactly as we filed it. Crisis averted, but definitely learned my lesson about double-checking entity names before panicking about search results.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Probably the Certana.ai one that was mentioned earlier. I've heard good things about their UCC document checker.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•Good reminder that sometimes the problem is operator error, not system error. Although the Illinois UCC search could definitely be more user-friendly.
0 coins